This test also illustrates that checking for properties is not working properly with
this attribute, as we are missing a diagnostic for a property not being implemented.
llvm-svn: 202335
Erroring out until we fix the bug means we don't have to keep chasing down
this same miscompile in a bunch of different places.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2890
llvm-svn: 202331
When true, sets the name of the file to be the name from
'external-contents'. Otherwise, you get the virtual path that the file
was looked up by. This will not affect any non-virtual paths, or fully
virtual paths (for which there is no reasonable 'external' name anyway).
The setting is available globally, but can be overriden on a per-file
basis.
The goal is that this setting will control which path you see in debug
info, diagnostics, etc. which are sensitive to which path is used. That
will come in future patches that pass the name through to FileManager.
llvm-svn: 202329
For example:
unreachable();
break;
This code is idiomatic and defensive. The fact that 'break' is
unreachable here is not interesting. This occurs frequently
in LLVM/Clang itself.
llvm-svn: 202328
This is to support some analyses, like -Wunreachable-code, that
will need to recover the original unprunned CFG edges in order
to suppress issues that aren't really bugs in practice.
There are two important changes here:
- AdjacentBlock replaces CFGBlock* for CFG successors/predecessors.
This has the size of 2 pointers, instead of 1. This is unlikely
to have a significant memory impact on Sema since a single
CFG usually exists at one time, but could impact the memory
usage of the static analyzer. This could possibly be optimized
down to a single pointer with some cleverness.
- Predecessors can now contain null predecessors, which means
some analyses doing a reverse traversal will need to take into
account. This already exists for successors, which contain
successor slots for specific branch kinds (e.g., 'if') that
expect a fixed number of successors, even if a branch is
not reachable.
llvm-svn: 202325
Clang is using llvm::StructType::isOpaque() as a way of signaling if
we've finished record type conversion in
CodeGenTypes::isRecordLayoutComplete(). However, Clang was setting the
body of the type before it finished laying out the type as a base type.
Laying out the %class.C.base LLVM type attempts to convert more types,
eventually recursively attempting to layout 'C' again, at which point we
would say that layout was complete, even though we were still in the
middle of it.
By not setting the body, we correctly signal that layout is not
complete, and things work as expected.
At some point, it might be worth refactoring this to avoid looking at
the LLVM IR types under construction.
llvm-svn: 202320
Before this patch the globals were created with the wrong linkage and patched
afterwards. From the comments it looks like something would complain about
having an internal GV with no initializer. At least in clang the verifier will
only run way after we set the initializer, so that is not a problem.
This patch should be a nop. It just figures out the linkage earlier and
converts the old calls to setLinkage to asserts. The only case where that is
not possible is when we first see a weak import that is then implemented. In
that case we have to change the linkage, but that is the only setLinkage left.
llvm-svn: 202305
target_link_libraries(INTERFACE) doesn't bring inter-target dependencies in add_library,
although final targets have dependencies to whole dependent libraries.
It makes most libraries can be built in parallel.
target_link_libraries(PRIVATE) is used to shaared library.
Each dependent library is linked to the target.so, and its user will not see its grandchildren.
For example,
- libclang.so has sufficient libclang*.a(s).
- c-index-test requires just only libclang.so.
FIXME: lld is tweaked minimally. Adding INTERFACE in each library would be better thing.
llvm-svn: 202241
For now, use both keywords, INTERFACE and PRIVATE via the variable,
- ${cmake_2_8_12_INTERFACE}
- ${cmake_2_8_12_PRIVATE}
They could be cleaned up when we introduce 2.8.12.
llvm-svn: 202239
null comparison when the pointer is known to be non-null.
This catches the array to pointer decay, function to pointer decay and
address of variables. This does not catch address of function since this
has been previously used to silence a warning.
Pointer to bool conversion is under -Wbool-conversion.
Pointer to null comparison is under -Wtautological-pointer-compare, a sub-group
of -Wtautological-compare.
void foo() {
int arr[5];
int x;
// warn on these conditionals
if (foo);
if (arr);
if (&x);
if (foo == null);
if (arr == null);
if (&x == null);
if (&foo); // no warning
}
llvm-svn: 202216
For now, just ignore them. Later, we could try looking through LazyCompoundVals,
but we at least shouldn't crash.
<rdar://problem/16153464>
llvm-svn: 202212
The warnings fall into three groups.
1) Using an absolute value function of the wrong type, for instance, using the
int absolute value function when the argument is a floating point type.
2) Using the improper sized absolute value function, for instance, using abs
when the argument is a long long. llabs should be used instead.
From these two cases, an implicit conversion will occur which may cause
unexpected behavior. Where possible, suggest the proper absolute value
function to use, and which header to include if the function is not available.
3) Taking the absolute value of an unsigned value. In addition to this warning,
suggest to remove the function call. This usually indicates a logic error
since the programmer assumed negative values would have been possible.
llvm-svn: 202211
Generating RTTI in the MS ABI is currently not supported, and the failures
are confusing to users, so let's disable it by default for now.
llvm-svn: 202178
This was changed to use manual desugaring and multiplication in r201832
and fixed for multi-dimensional arrays in r201917. However, it breaks
down in the presence of typedefs. Rather than attempting to handle all
the desugaring, just go back to calling the generic type info code.
This was discovered while compiling SIInstrWaits.cpp in the R600
backend.
llvm-svn: 202175
- Don't emit anything when we encounter a call to a conversion operator.
"bar(a & b)" instead of "bar(a & b.operator int())"
This preserves the semantics and is still idempotent if we print the AST multiple times.
- Properly print declarations of conversion operators.
"explicit operator bool();" instead of "bool operator _Bool();"
PR18776.
llvm-svn: 202167
The 'f' modifier is designed for integer type arguments really (according to
its documentation). It's better to use the "half width, same number" modifier.
Should be no user-visible change.
llvm-svn: 202152
Nick Lewycky