This patch adds synchronization between the creation of the GCD data object and destructor’s execution. It’s far from perfect, because ideally we’d want to synchronize the destruction of the last reference (via dispatch_release) and the destructor’s execution, but intercepting objc_release is problematic.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21990
llvm-svn: 274749
OpenMP relies on some helper expressions generated during semantic
analysis. But they are required only for codegen and not required in
dependent contexts. Patch removes generation of some of helper
expressions.
llvm-svn: 274745
These registers are only available on a limited set of ARM targets (those
based on XScale). Other targets should not have to pay the cost of these.
This patch shaves off about ~300 bytes of stack usage and ~1KB of code-size.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21991
Reviewers: bcraig, compnerd
Change-Id: I2d7a1911a193bd70b123e78747e1a7d1482463c7
llvm-svn: 274744
This is a follow-up for r273544.
The end goal is to get rid of the isSwift / isCortexXY / isWhatever methods.
This commit also removes a command line flag that isn't used in any of the tests:
check-vmlx-hazards. It can be replaced easily with the mattr mechanism, since
this is now a subtarget feature.
There is still some work left regarding FeatureExpandMLx. In the past MLx
expansion was enabled for subtargets with hasVFP2(), until r129775 [1] switched
from that to isCortexA9, without too much justification.
In spite of that, the code performing MLx expansion still contains calls to
isSwift/isLikeA9, although the results of those are pretty clear given that
we're only enabling it for the A9.
We should try to enable it for all targets that have FeatureHasVMLxHazards, as
it seems to be closely related to that behaviour, and if that is possible try to
clean up the MLx expansion pass from all calls to isWhatever. This will require
some performance testing, so it will be done in another patch.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20110418/119725.html
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21798
llvm-svn: 274742
Summary:
This patch fills in the implementation of GetMemoryRegions() on the Linux and Mac OS core file implementations of lldb_private::Process (ProcessElfCore::GetMemoryRegions and ProcessMachCore::GetMemoryRegions.) The GetMemoryRegions API was added under: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20565
The patch re-uses the m_core_range_infos list that was recently added to implement GetMemoryRegionInfo in both ProcessElfCore and ProcessMachCore to ensure the returned regions match the regions returned by Process::GetMemoryRegionInfo(addr_t load_addr, MemoryRegionInfo ®ion_info).
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: labath, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21751
llvm-svn: 274741
friend definitions.
Based on the experiments Sean Silva and Reid did, this seems the safest
course of action and also will work around a questionable warning
provided by GCC6 on the old form of the code. Thanks for Davide pointing
out the issue and other suggesting ways to fix.
llvm-svn: 274740
Previously we had incorrect logic here. Imagine we would have the next script:
LIBSAMPLE_1.0
{
global:
a_2;
local:
*;
};
LIBSAMPLE_2.0
{
global:
a*;
};
According to previous logic it would assign version 1 to a_2 and then
would try to reassign it to version 2 because of applying wildcard a*.
And show a warning about that.
Generally Ian Lance Tailor wrote about next rules that should be applied:
(http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/300)
Here are the current rules for gold:
"If there is an exact match for the mangled name, we use it. If there is more than one exact match, we give a warning, and we use the first tag in the script which matches. If a symbol has an exact match as both global and local for the same version tag, we give an error.
Otherwise, we look for an extern C++ or an extern Java exact match. If we find an exact match, we use it. If there is more than one exact match, we give a warning, and we use the first tag in the script which matches. If a symbol has an exact match as both global and local for the same version tag, we give an error.
Otherwise, we look through the wildcard patterns, ignoring “*” patterns. We look through the version tags in reverse order. For each version tag, we look through the global patterns and then the local patterns. We use the first match we find (i.e., the last matching version tag in the file).
Otherwise, we use the “*” pattern if there is one. We give a warning if there are multiple “*” patterns."
Patch makes wildcard matching to be in revered order and to follow after the regular naming matching.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21894
llvm-svn: 274739
Summary: This patch is adding support to recognize more complex redundant expressions.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits, chrisha
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21392
llvm-svn: 274731
Previously, ch_size was read in host byte order, so if a host and
a target are different in byte order, we would produce a corrupted
output.
llvm-svn: 274729
Summary:
Adds option -esan-aux-field-info to control generating binary with
auxiliary struct field information.
Extracts code for creating auxiliary information from
createCacheFragInfoGV into createCacheFragAuxGV.
Adds test struct_field_small.ll for -esan-aux-field-info test.
Reviewers: aizatsky
Subscribers: llvm-commits, bruening, eugenis, kcc, zhaoqin, vitalybuka
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22019
llvm-svn: 274726
os name and version # from the mach-o binary as it scans the
header/load commands from memory and sends the details back
in the jGetLoadedDynamicLibrariesInfos response. lldb isn't
using these fields yet but I have a suspicion I'm going to
need them soon.
<rdar://problem/25251243>
llvm-svn: 274725
This check is not only unnecessary, it can produce the wrong result. If we
are linking a single module and it has an exported linkonce symbol, we need
to promote to weak in order to avoid PR19901-style problems.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21917
llvm-svn: 274722
to find the solibs loaded in a process. Support two new ways of
sending the jGetLoadedDynamicLibrariesInfos packet to debugserver
and add a new jGetSharedCacheInfo packet. Update the documentation
for these packets as well. The changes to lldb to use these will
be a separate commit.
<rdar://problem/25251243>
llvm-svn: 274718
Some compilers are too dumb to realize that the switch statement covers
all cases.
(Don't use a "default" label, because we explicitly want to get a warning
if our switch doesn't cover all the cases.)
llvm-svn: 274713
Reverting because it causes a test failure on build bots (Modules/ModuleDebugInfo.cpp). Failure does not reproduce locally.
svn revision: rL274698
This reverts commit 3c5ed6599b086720aab5b8bd6941149d066806a6.
llvm-svn: 274706
"frame variable" and "target variable" are trying to emulate the expression parser when doing things like:
(lldb) frame variable &my_struct.my_bitfield
And since the expression parser doesn't allow this, we shouldn't allow "frame variable" or "target variable" to succeed.
<rdar://problem/27208607>
llvm-svn: 274703
Bitfields were not correctly describing their offsets within the integer that they are contained within. If we had a bitfield like:
struct MyStruct {
uint32_t a:8;
uint32_t b:8;
};
ClangASTContext::GetChildCompilerTypeAtIndex would say that child a and b had the following values in their respective ValueObjectChild objects:
name byte-size bit-size bit-offset byte-offset-from-parent
==== ========= ======== ========== =======================
"a" 4 8 0 0
"b" 4 8 0 1
So if we had a "MyStruct" at address 0x1000, we would end up reading 4 bytes from 0x1000 for "a", and 4 bytes from 0x1001 for "b". The fix for this is to fix the "child_byte_offset" and "child_bitfield_bit_offset" values returned by ClangASTContext::GetChildCompilerTypeAtIndex() so that now the table looks like:
name byte-size bit-size bit-offset byte-offset-from-parent
==== ========= ======== ========== =======================
"a" 4 8 0 0
"b" 4 8 8 0
Then we don't run into a problem when reading data from a file's section info using "target variable" before running. It will also stop us from not being able to display a bitfield values if the bitfield is in the last bit of memory before an unmapped region. (Like if address 0x1004 was unmapped and unreadable in the example above, if we tried to read 4 bytes from 0x1001, the memory read would fail and we wouldn't be able to display "b").
<rdar://problem/27208225>
llvm-svn: 274701
may be in a function that is non-ABI conformant, and the eh_frame
instructions correctly describe how to unwind out of this function,
but the assembly parsing / arch default unwind plans would be
incorrect.
This is to address a problem that Ravitheja Addepally reported in
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21221 - I wanted to try handling the problem
with this approach which I think may be more generally helpful,
Ravitheja tested it and said it solves the problem on Linux/FreeBSD.
Ravi has a test case in http://reviews.llvm.org/D21221 that will
be committed separately.
Thanks for all the help on this one, Ravi.
llvm-svn: 274700
This tests the effect of both promotion and internalization on a module,
and helps show that D21883 is NFC wrt promotion+internalization.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21915
llvm-svn: 274699
This should work now that the LLVM-side of the change has landed successfully.
Original Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21705
This reverts commit a30322e861c387e1088f47065d0438c6bb019879.
llvm-svn: 274698
Kuba Brecka