This isn't a sure thing (are 2 extra bitcasts less expensive than a logic op?),
but we'll try to err on the conservative side by going with the case that has
less IR instructions.
Note: This question came up in http://reviews.llvm.org/D22114 , but this part is
independent of that patch proposal, so I'm making this small change ahead of that
one.
See also:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL274926
llvm-svn: 274932
We can fold truncs whose operand feeds from a load, if the trunc value
is available through a prior load/store.
This change is from: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21246, which folded the
trunc but missed the bitcast or ptrtoint/inttoptr required in the RAUW
call, when the load type didnt match the prior load/store type.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21791
llvm-svn: 274853
By replacing dyn_cast of ConstantInt with m_Zero/m_One/m_AllOnes, we
allow these transforms for splat vectors.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21899
llvm-svn: 274696
Summary: This adds tests for covering all cases that FoldAndOfFCmps and FoldOrOfFCmps handle.
Reviewers: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21844
llvm-svn: 274144
This is breaking an optimizaton remark test in clang. I've identified a couple fixes for that, but want to understand it better before I commit to anything.
llvm-svn: 274102
If a operation for a recurrence is an addition with no signed wrap and both input sign bits are 0, then the result sign bit must also be 0. Similar for the negative case.
I found this deficiency while playing around with a loop in the x86 backend that contained a signed division that could be optimized into an unsigned division if we could prove both inputs were positive. One of them being the loop induction variable. With this patch we can perform the conversion for this case. One of the test cases here is a contrived variation of the loop I was looking at.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21493
llvm-svn: 274098
Revert "[InstCombine] Combine A->B->A BitCast"
as this appears to cause PR27996 and as discussed in http://reviews.llvm.org/D20847
This reverts commits r270135 and r263734.
llvm-svn: 274094
This is a resubmittion of 263158 change after fixing the existing problem with intrinsics mangling (see LTO and intrinsics mangling llvm-dev thread for details).
This patch fixes the problem which occurs when loop-vectorize tries to use @llvm.masked.load/store intrinsic for a non-default addrspace pointer. It fails with "Calling a function with a bad signature!" assertion in CallInst constructor because it tries to pass a non-default addrspace pointer to the pointer argument which has default addrspace.
The fix is to add pointer type as another overloaded type to @llvm.masked.load/store intrinsics.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17270
llvm-svn: 274043
This is a resubmittion of 263158 change after fixing the existing problem with intrinsics mangling (see LTO and intrinsics mangling llvm-dev thread for details).
This patch fixes the problem which occurs when loop-vectorize tries to use @llvm.masked.load/store intrinsic for a non-default addrspace pointer. It fails with "Calling a function with a bad signature!" assertion in CallInst constructor because it tries to pass a non-default addrspace pointer to the pointer argument which has default addrspace.
The fix is to add pointer type as another overloaded type to @llvm.masked.load/store intrinsics.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17270
llvm-svn: 273892
By putting all the possible commutations together, we simplify the code.
Note that this is NFCI, but I'm adding tests that actually exercise each
commutation pattern because we don't have this anywhere else.
llvm-svn: 273702
Summary:
This instcombine rule folds away trunc operations that have value available from a prior load or store.
This kind of code can be generated as a result of GVN widening the load or from source code as well.
Reviewers: reames, majnemer, sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21246
llvm-svn: 273608
By moving this transform to InstSimplify from InstCombine, we sidestep the problem/question
raised by PR27869:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27869
...where InstCombine turns an icmp+zext into a shift causing us to miss the fold.
Credit to David Majnemer for a draft patch of the changes to InstructionSimplify.cpp.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21512
llvm-svn: 273200
Anna Thomas