when safe.
The testcase is basically this nested loop:
void foo(char *X) {
for (int i = 0; i != 100; ++i)
for (int j = 0; j != 100; ++j)
X[j+i*100] = 0;
}
which gets turned into a single memset now. clang -O3 doesn't optimize
this yet though due to a phase ordering issue I haven't analyzed yet.
llvm-svn: 122806
instruction *after* the store. The store will always be deleted
if the transformation kicks in, so we'd do an N^2 scan of every
loop block. Whoops.
llvm-svn: 122805
int x = 42;
x = x; // Warns here.
The warning avoids macro expansions, templates, user-defined assignment
operators, and volatile types, so false positives are expected to be low.
The common (mis-)use of this code pattern is to silence unused variable
warnings, but a more idiomatic way of doing that is '(void)x;'.
A follow-up to this will add a note and fix-it hint suggesting this
replacement in cases where the StmtExpr consists precisely of the self
assignment.
llvm-svn: 122804
declaration name of the array when present. This ensures that
a poor-man's C++03 static_assert will include the user error message
often embedded in the name.
Update all the tests to reflect the new wording, and add a test for the
name behavior.
llvm-svn: 122802
FunctionPass. It probably doesn't have a reason to be a LoopPass, as it will
probably drop the simple fixed point and either use RPO iteration or Duncan's
approach in instsimplify of only revisiting instructions that have changed.
The next step is to preserve LoopSimplify. This looks like it won't be too hard,
although the pass manager doesn't actually seem to respect when non-loop passes
claim to preserve LCSSA or LoopSimplify. This will have to be fixed.
llvm-svn: 122791
prologue and epilogue if the adjustment is 8. Similarly, use pushl / popl if
the adjustment is 4 in 32-bit mode.
In the epilogue, takes care to pop to a caller-saved register that's not live
at the exit (either return or tailcall instruction).
rdar://8771137
llvm-svn: 122783
a pointer value has potentially become escaping. Implementations can choose to either fall back to
conservative responses for that value, or may recompute their analysis to accomodate the change.
llvm-svn: 122777
(clang/include/clang/Basic/StmtNodes.td, for instance, is tablegenned
from clang/include/clang/AST/CMakeLists.txt) so it is not contained on
the list of all .td files on the current source directory which is
used as the DEPENDS of the custom command. We must add the .td file to
the DEPENDS list of the custom command. Otherwise some .inc files are
not regenerated when the corresponding .td file changes.
llvm-svn: 122768
When we are in code-completion mode, skip parsing of all function bodies except the one where the
code-completion point resides.
For big .cpp files like 'SemaExpr.cpp' the improvement makes a huge difference, in some cases cutting down
code-completion time -62% !
We don't get diagnostics for the bodies though, so modify the code-completion tests that check for errors.
See rdar://8814203.
llvm-svn: 122765
(transforming each in turn) into calls into one central routine
(TransformExprs) that transforms a list of expressions. This
refactoring is preparatory work for pack expansions whose in an
expression-list.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 122761
that are allowed to have metadata operands are intrinsic calls,
and the only ones that take metadata currently return void.
Just reject all void instructions, which should not be value
numbered anyway. To future proof things, add an assert to the
getHashValue impl for calls to check that metadata operands
aren't present.
llvm-svn: 122759
nested values, so they can change and drop to null, which can
change the hash and cause havok.
It turns out that it isn't a good idea to value number stuff
with metadata operands anyway, so... don't.
llvm-svn: 122758
Duncan Sands