Remove remaining implicit conversions from MachineInstrBundleIterator to
MachineInstr* from the ARM backend. In most cases, I made them less attractive
by preferring MachineInstr& or using a ranged-based for loop.
Once all the backends are fixed I'll make the operator explicit so that this
doesn't bitrot back.
llvm-svn: 274920
This is mostly a mechanical change to make TargetInstrInfo API take
MachineInstr& (instead of MachineInstr* or MachineBasicBlock::iterator)
when the argument is expected to be a valid MachineInstr. This is a
general API improvement.
Although it would be possible to do this one function at a time, that
would demand a quadratic amount of churn since many of these functions
call each other. Instead I've done everything as a block and just
updated what was necessary.
This is mostly mechanical fixes: adding and removing `*` and `&`
operators. The only non-mechanical change is to split
ARMBaseInstrInfo::getOperandLatencyImpl out from
ARMBaseInstrInfo::getOperandLatency. Previously, the latter took a
`MachineInstr*` which it updated to the instruction bundle leader; now,
the latter calls the former either with the same `MachineInstr&` or the
bundle leader.
As a side effect, this removes a bunch of MachineInstr* to
MachineBasicBlock::iterator implicit conversions, a necessary step
toward fixing PR26753.
Note: I updated WebAssembly, Lanai, and AVR (despite being
off-by-default) since it turned out to be easy. I couldn't run tests
for AVR since llc doesn't link with it turned on.
llvm-svn: 274189
Summary:
This adds the same checks that were added in r264593 to all
target-specific passes that run after register allocation.
Reviewers: qcolombet
Subscribers: jyknight, dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18525
llvm-svn: 265313
Summary:
Currently, the ARM Constant Island may not converge (or not converge quickly).
This patch let it move to the closest water after the user if it doesn't converge after 15 iterations.
This address https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25339
Reviewers: t.p.northover, srhines, kristof.beyls, aadg, rengolin
Subscribers: weimingz, aemerson, rengolin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16890
llvm-svn: 261665
Change TargetInstrInfo API to take `MachineInstr&` instead of
`MachineInstr*` in the functions related to predicated instructions
(I'll try to come back later and get some of the rest). All of these
functions require non-null parameters already, so references are more
clear. As a bonus, this happens to factor away a host of implicit
iterator => pointer conversions.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 261605
I missed == and != when I removed implicit conversions between iterators
and pointers in r252380 since they were defined outside ilist_iterator.
Since they depend on getNodePtrUnchecked(), they indirectly rely on UB.
This commit removes all uses of these operators. (I'll delete the
operators themselves in a separate commit so that it can be easily
reverted if necessary.)
There should be NFC here.
llvm-svn: 261498
(This is the second attempt to submit this patch. The first caused two assertion
failures and was reverted. See https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25687)
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254377
and the follow-up r254356: "Fix a bug in MachineBlockPlacement that may cause assertion failure during BranchProbability construction."
Asserts were firing in Chromium builds. See PR25687.
llvm-svn: 254366
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254348
Function ARMConstantIslands::doInitialJumpTablePlacement() iterates over all
basic blocks in a machine function. It calls `MI = MBB.getLastNonDebugInstr()`
to get the last instruction in each block and then uses MI->getOpcode() to
decide what to do. If getLastNonDebugInstr() returns MBB.end() (for example,
when the block does not contain any instructions) then calling getOpcode() on
this value is incorrect. Avoid this problem by checking the result of
getLastNonDebugInstr().
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14694
llvm-svn: 253222
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
This patch is quite boring overall, except for some uglyness in
ASMPrinter which has a getDataLayout function but has some clients
that use it without a Module (llmv-dsymutil, llvm-dwarfdump), so
some methods are taking a DataLayout as parameter.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: yaron.keren, rafael, llvm-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11090
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 242386
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
The original version didn't properly account for the base register
being modified before the final jump, so caused miscompilations in
Chromium and LLVM. I've fixed this and tested with an LLVM self-host
(I don't have the means to build & test Chromium).
The general idea remains the same: in pathological cases jump tables
can be too far away from the instructions referencing them (like other
constants) so they need to be movable.
Should fix PR23627.
llvm-svn: 238680
This was previously returning int. However there are no negative opcode
numbers and more importantly this was needlessly different from
MCInstrDesc::getOpcode() (which even is the value returned here) and
SDValue::getOpcode()/SDNode::getOpcode().
llvm-svn: 237611
Previously, they were forced to immediately follow the actual branch
instruction. This was usually OK (the LEAs actually accessing them got emitted
nearby, and weren't usually separated much afterwards). Unfortunately, a
sufficiently nasty phi elimination dumps many instructions right before the
basic block terminator, and this can increase the range too much.
This patch frees them up to be placed as usual by the constant islands pass,
and consequently has to slightly modify the form of TBB/TBH tables to refer to
a PC-relative label at the final jump. The other jump table formats were
already position-independent.
rdar://20813304
llvm-svn: 237590
We were creating and propagating two separate indices for each jump table (from
back in the mists of time). However, the generic index used by other backends
is sufficient to emit a unique symbol so this was unneeded.
llvm-svn: 237294
The previous logic mixed 2 separate questions:
+ Can we form a TBB/TBH instruction?
+ Can we remove the jump-table calculation before it?
It then performed a bunch of random tests on the instructions earlier in the
basic block, which were probably sufficient to answer 2 but only because of the
very limited ways in which a t2BR_JT can actually be created.
For example there's no reason to expect the LeaInst to define the same base
register as the following indexing calulation. In practice this means we might
have missed opportunities to form TBB/TBH, in theory you could end up
misidentifying a sequence and removing the wrong LEA:
%R1 = t2LEApcrelJT ...
%R2 = t2LEApcrelJT ...
<... using and killing %R2 ...>
%R2 = t2ADDr %R1, $Ridx
Before we would have looked for an LEA defining %R2 and found the wrong one. We
just got lucky that jump table setup was (almost?) always confined to a single
basic block and there was only one jump table per block.
llvm-svn: 237293
Functions with jump tables need an alignment of 4 because they use the ADR
instruction, which aligns the PC to 4 bytes before adding an offset.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9424
llvm-svn: 236327
The order in which branches appear in ImmBranches is approximately their
order within the function body. By visiting later branches first, we reduce
the distance between earlier forward branches and their targets, making it
more likely that the cbn?z optimization, which can only apply to forward
branches, will succeed for those earlier branches.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9185
llvm-svn: 235640
This appears to have been introduced back in r76698 as part of an unrelated
change. I can find no official ARM documentation stating that Thumb-2 functions
require 4-byte alignment; in fact, ARM documentation appears to contradict
this (see, e.g., ARM Architecture Reference Manual Thumb-2 Supplement,
section 2.6.1: "Thumb-2 enforces 16-bit alignment on all instructions.").
Also remove code that sets alignment for ARM functions, which is redundant
with code in the MachineFunction constructor, and remove the hidden
-arm-align-constant-islands flag, which has been enabled by default since
r146739 (Dec 2011) and has probably received sufficient testing by now.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9138
llvm-svn: 235636
derived classes.
Since global data alignment, layout, and mangling is often based on the
DataLayout, move it to the TargetMachine. This ensures that global
data is going to be layed out and mangled consistently if the subtarget
changes on a per function basis. Prior to this all targets(*) have
had subtarget dependent code moved out and onto the TargetMachine.
*One target hasn't been migrated as part of this change: R600. The
R600 port has, as a subtarget feature, the size of pointers and
this affects global data layout. I've currently hacked in a FIXME
to enable progress, but the port needs to be updated to either pass
the 64-bitness to the TargetMachine, or fix the DataLayout to
avoid subtarget dependent features.
llvm-svn: 227113
The assert was being triggered when the distance between a constant pool entry
and its user exceeded the maximally allowed distance after thumb2 branch
shortening. A padding was inserted after a thumb2 branch instruction was shrunk,
which caused the user to be out of range. This is wrong as the padding should
have been inserted by the layout algorithm so that the distance between two
instructions doesn't grow later during thumb2 instruction optimization.
This commit fixes the code in ARMConstantIslands::createNewWater to call
computeBlockSize and set BasicBlock::Unalign when a branch instruction is
inserted to create new water after a basic block. A non-zero Unalign causes
the worst-case padding to be inserted when adjustBBOffsetsAfter is called to
recompute the basic block offsets.
rdar://problem/19130476
llvm-svn: 225467
Normally entries can only move to a lower address, but when that wasn't viable,
the user's block was considered anyway. Unfortunately, it went via
createNewWater which wasn't designed to handle the case where there's already
an island after the block.
Unfortunately, the test we have is slow and fragile, and I couldn't reduce it
to anything sane even with the @llvm.arm.space intrinsic. The test change here
is recreating the previous one after the change.
rdar://problem/18545506
llvm-svn: 221905
We were using a naive heuristic to determine whether a basic block already had
an unconditional branch at the end. This mostly corresponded to reality
(assuming branches got optimised) because there's not much point in a branch to
the next block, but could go wrong.
llvm-svn: 221904
The bug is in ARMConstantIslands::createNewWater where the upper bound of the
new water split point is computed:
// This could point off the end of the block if we've already got constant
// pool entries following this block; only the last one is in the water list.
// Back past any possible branches (allow for a conditional and a maximally
// long unconditional).
if (BaseInsertOffset + 8 >= UserBBI.postOffset()) {
BaseInsertOffset = UserBBI.postOffset() - UPad - 8;
DEBUG(dbgs() << format("Move inside block: %#x\n", BaseInsertOffset));
}
The split point is supposed to be somewhere between the machine instruction that
loads from the constant pool entry and the end of the basic block, before branch
instructions. The code above is fine if the basic block is large enough and
there are a sufficient number of instructions following the machine instruction.
However, if the machine instruction is near the end of the basic block,
BaseInsertOffset can point to the machine instruction or another instruction
that precedes it, and this can lead to convergence failure.
This commit fixes this bug by ensuring BaseInsertOffset is larger than the
offset of the instruction following the constant-loading instruction.
rdar://problem/18581150
llvm-svn: 220015
shorter/easier and have the DAG use that to do the same lookup. This
can be used in the future for TargetMachine based caching lookups from
the MachineFunction easily.
Update the MIPS subtarget switching machinery to update this pointer
at the same time it runs.
llvm-svn: 214838
The ARM backend did not expect LDRBi12 to hold a constant pool operand.
Allow for LLVM to deal with the instruction similar to how it deals with
LDRi12.
This fixes PR16215.
llvm-svn: 183238
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
llvm-svn: 171366
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith