We currently do not touch a symbol's linkage in the case where a definition
has a single copy. However, this code is effectively unnecessary: either
the definition is not exported, in which case the internalize phase sets
its linkage to internal, or it is exported, in which case we need to promote
linkage to weak. Those two cases are already handled by existing code.
I believe that the only real functional change here is in the case where we
have a single definition which does not prevail (e.g. because the definition
in a native object file prevails). In that case we now lower linkage to
available_externally following the existing code path for that case.
As a result we can remove the isExported function parameter from the
thinLTOResolveWeakForLinkerInIndex function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21883
llvm-svn: 274784
This check is not only unnecessary, it can produce the wrong result. If we
are linking a single module and it has an exported linkonce symbol, we need
to promote to weak in order to avoid PR19901-style problems.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21917
llvm-svn: 274722
* UpdateCompilerUsed() -> updateCompilerUsed()
* ThinLTO doesn't use the API so we can remove the include
* Clean up unused #include <functional> from the header
* Rename #ifdef guard comment to be correct.
llvm-svn: 273461
This is indeed a much cleaner approach (thanks to Daniel Berlin
for pointing out), and also David/Sean for review.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21454
llvm-svn: 273032
Daniel Berlin expressed some real concerns about the port and proposed
and alternative approach. I'll revert this for now while working on a
new patch, which I hope to put up for review shortly. Sorry for the churn.
llvm-svn: 272925
Nearly all the changes to this pass have been done while maintaining and
updating other parts of LLVM. LLVM has had another pass, SROA, which
has superseded ScalarReplAggregates for quite some time.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21316
llvm-svn: 272737
The need for all these Lookup* functions is just because of calls to
getAnalysis inside methods (i.e. not at the top level) of the
runOnFunction method. They should be straightforward to clean up when
the old PM is gone.
llvm-svn: 272615
Below are my super rough notes when porting. They can probably serve as
a basic guide for porting other passes to the new PM. As I port more
passes I'll expand and generalize this and make a proper
docs/HowToPortToNewPassManager.rst document. There is also missing
documentation for general concepts and API's in the new PM which will
require some documentation.
Once there is proper documentation in place we can put up a list of
passes that have to be ported and game-ify/crowdsource the rest of the
porting (at least of the middle end; the backend is still unclear).
I will however be taking personal responsibility for ensuring that the
LLD/ELF LTO pipeline is ported in a timely fashion. The remaining passes
to be ported are (do something like
`git grep "<the string in the bullet point below>"` to find the pass):
General Scalar:
[ ] Simplify the CFG
[ ] Jump Threading
[ ] MemCpy Optimization
[ ] Promote Memory to Register
[ ] MergedLoadStoreMotion
[ ] Lazy Value Information Analysis
General IPO:
[ ] Dead Argument Elimination
[ ] Deduce function attributes in RPO
Loop stuff / vectorization stuff:
[ ] Alignment from assumptions
[ ] Canonicalize natural loops
[ ] Delete dead loops
[ ] Loop Access Analysis
[ ] Loop Invariant Code Motion
[ ] Loop Vectorization
[ ] SLP Vectorizer
[ ] Unroll loops
Devirtualization / CFI:
[ ] Cross-DSO CFI
[ ] Whole program devirtualization
[ ] Lower bitset metadata
CGSCC passes:
[ ] Function Integration/Inlining
[ ] Remove unused exception handling info
[ ] Promote 'by reference' arguments to scalars
Please let me know if you are interested in working on any of the passes
in the above list (e.g. reply to the post-commit thread for this patch).
I'll probably be tackling "General Scalar" and "General IPO" first FWIW.
Steps as I port "Deduce function attributes in RPO"
---------------------------------------------------
(note: if you are doing any work based on these notes, please leave a
note in the post-commit review thread for this commit with any
improvements / suggestions / incompleteness you ran into!)
Note: "Deduce function attributes in RPO" is a module pass.
1. Do preparatory refactoring.
Do preparatory factoring. In this case all I had to do was to pull out a static helper (r272503).
(TODO: give more advice here e.g. if pass holds state or something)
2. Rename the old pass class.
llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/FunctionAttrs.cpp
Rename class ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrs -> ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsLegacyPass
in preparation for adding a class ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrs as the pass in the new PM.
(edit: actually wait what? The new class name will be
ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsPass, so it doesn't conflict. So this step is
sort of useless churn).
llvm/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h
llvm/lib/LTO/LTOCodeGenerator.cpp
llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/IPO.cpp
llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/FunctionAttrs.cpp
Rename initializeReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsPass -> initializeReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsLegacyPassPass
(note that the "PassPass" thing falls out of `s/ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrs/ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsLegacyPass/`)
Note that the INITIALIZE_PASS macro is what creates this identifier name, so renaming the class requires this renaming too.
Note that createReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsPass does not need to be
renamed since its name is not generated from the class name.
3. Add the new PM pass class.
In the new PM all passes need to have their
declaration in a header somewhere, so you will often need to add a header.
In this case
llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/IPO/FunctionAttrs.h is already there because
PostOrderFunctionAttrsPass was already ported.
The file-level comment from the .cpp file can be used as the file-level
comment for the new header. You may want to tweak the wording slightly
from "this file implements" to "this file provides" or similar.
Add declaration for the new PM pass in this header:
class ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsPass
: public PassInfoMixin<ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsPass> {
public:
PreservedAnalyses run(Module &M, AnalysisManager<Module> &AM);
};
Its name should end with `Pass` for consistency (note that this doesn't
collide with the names of most old PM passes). E.g. call it
`<name of the old PM pass>Pass`.
Also, move the doxygen comment from the old PM pass to the declaration of
this class in the header.
Also, include the declaration for the new PM class
`llvm/Transforms/IPO/FunctionAttrs.h` at the top of the file (in this case,
it was already done when the other pass in this file was ported).
Now define the `run` method for the new class.
The main things here are:
a) Use AM.getResult<...>(M) to get results instead of `getAnalysis<...>()`
b) If the old PM pass would have returned "false" (i.e. `Changed ==
false`), then you should return PreservedAnalyses::all();
c) In the old PM getAnalysisUsage method, observe the calls
`AU.addPreserved<...>();`.
In the case `Changed == true`, for each preserved analysis you should do
call `PA.preserve<...>()` on a PreservedAnalyses object and return it.
E.g.:
PreservedAnalyses PA;
PA.preserve<CallGraphAnalysis>();
return PA;
Note that calls to skipModule/skipFunction are not supported in the new PM
currently, so optnone and optimization bisect support do not work. You can
just drop those calls for now.
4. Add the pass to the new PM pass registry to make it available in opt.
In llvm/lib/Passes/PassBuilder.cpp add a #include for your header.
`#include "llvm/Transforms/IPO/FunctionAttrs.h"`
In this case there is already an include (from when
PostOrderFunctionAttrsPass was ported).
Add your pass to llvm/lib/Passes/PassRegistry.def
In this case, I added
`MODULE_PASS("rpo-functionattrs", ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsPass())`
The string is from the `INITIALIZE_PASS*` macros used in the old pass
manager.
Then choose a test that uses the pass and use the new PM `-passes=...` to
run it.
E.g. in this case there is a test that does:
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -functionattrs -rpo-functionattrs -S | FileCheck %s
I have added the line:
; RUN: opt < %s -aa-pipeline=basic-aa -passes='require<targetlibinfo>,cgscc(function-attrs),rpo-functionattrs' -S | FileCheck %s
The `-aa-pipeline=basic-aa` and
`require<targetlibinfo>,cgscc(function-attrs)` are what is needed to run
functionattrs in the new PM (note that in the new PM "functionattrs"
becomes "function-attrs" for some reason). This is just pulled from
`readattrs.ll` which contains the change from when functionattrs was ported
to the new PM.
Adding rpo-functionattrs causes the pass that was just ported to run.
llvm-svn: 272505
Summary:
Ensure we keep prevailing copy of LinkOnceAny by converting it to
WeakAny.
Rename odr_resolution test to the now more appropriate weak_resolution
(weak in the linker sense includes linkonce).
Reviewers: joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits, joker.eph
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20634
llvm-svn: 270850
Move the now index-based ODR resolution and internalization routines out
of ThinLTOCodeGenerator.cpp and into either LTO.cpp (index-based
analysis) or FunctionImport.cpp (index-driven optimizations).
This is to enable usage by other linkers.
llvm-svn: 270698
Summary:
This patch changes the ODR resolution and internalization to be based on
updates to the Index, which are consumed by the backend portion of the
transformations.
It will be followed by an NFC change to move these out of libLTO's
ThinLTOCodeGenerator so that it can be used by other linkers
(gold and lld) and by ThinLTO distributed backends.
The global summary-based portions use callbacks so that the client can
determine the prevailing copy and other information in a client-specific
way. Eventually, with the API being developed in D20268, these may be
modified to use information such as symbol resolutions, supplied by the
clients to the API.
Reviewers: joker-eph
Subscribers: joker.eph, pcc, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20290
llvm-svn: 270584
Moved the ModuleLoader and supporting helper loadModuleFromBuffer out of
ThinLTOCodeGenerator and into new LTO.h/LTO.cpp files. This is in
preparation for a patch that will utilize these in the gold-plugin.
Note that there are some other pending patches (D20268 and D20290) that
also plan to refactor common interfaces and functionality into this same
pair of new files.
llvm-svn: 270509
Having an enum member named Default is quite confusing: Is it distinct
from the others?
This patch removes that member and instead uses Optional<Reloc> in
places where we have a user input that still hasn't been maped to the
default value, which is now clear has no be one of the remaining 3
options.
llvm-svn: 269988
This is a compile time optimization: keeping a large file to process
at the end hurts parallelism.
The heurisitic used right now is the input buffer size, however we
may want to consider the number of functions to import or the
different number of files to load for importing as well.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 269684
This is reducing pressure on the OS memory system, and is NFC
when not using a cache.
I measure a 10x memory consumption reduction when linking opt
with full debug info.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 269682
Summary:
Add support for emission of plaintext lists of the imported files for
each distributed backend compilation. Used for distributed build file
staging.
Invoked with new gold-plugin thinlto-emit-imports-files option, which is
only valid with thinlto-index-only (i.e. for distributed builds), or
from llvm-lto with new -thinlto-action=emitimports value.
Depends on D19556.
Reviewers: joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits, joker.eph
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19636
llvm-svn: 269067
This restores commit r268627:
Summary:
When launching ThinLTO backends in a distributed build (currently
supported in gold via the thinlto-index-only plugin option), emit
an individual index file for each backend process as described here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-April/098272.html
...
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19556
Address msan failures by avoiding std::prev on map.end(), the
theory is that this is causing issues due to some known UB problems
in __tree.
llvm-svn: 269059
This patch introduces a new option -lto-strip-invalid-debug-info, which
drops malformed debug info from the input.
The problem I'm trying to solve with this sequence of patches is that
historically we've done a really bad job at verifying debug info. We want
to be able to make the verifier stricter without having to worry about
breaking bitcode compatibility with existing producers. For example, we
don't necessarily want IR produced by an older version of clang to be
rejected by an LTO link just because of malformed debug info, and rather
provide an option to strip it. Note that merely outdated (but well-formed)
debug info would continue to be auto-upgraded in this scenario.
rdar://problem/25818489
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19987
This reapplies 268936 with a test case fix for Linux (-exported-symbol foo)
llvm-svn: 268965
This patch introduces a new option -lto-strip-invalid-debug-info, which
drops malformed debug info from the input.
The problem I'm trying to solve with this sequence of patches is that
historically we've done a really bad job at verifying debug info. We want
to be able to make the verifier stricter without having to worry about
breaking bitcode compatibility with existing producers. For example, we
don't necessarily want IR produced by an older version of clang to be
rejected by an LTO link just because of malformed debug info, and rather
provide an option to strip it. Note that merely outdated (but well-formed)
debug info would continue to be auto-upgraded in this scenario.
rdar://problem/25818489
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19987
llvm-svn: 268936
This reverts commit r268658.
I incorrectly diagnose this as the source of an assertion during an
LTO bootstrap of clang.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 268680
The assertions were assuming that the linker will not ask to preserve
a global that is internal or available_externally, as it does not
really make sense. In practice this break the bootstrap of clang,
I degrade to a warning for now.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 268671
Summary:
When launching ThinLTO backends in a distributed build (currently
supported in gold via the thinlto-index-only plugin option), emit
an individual index file for each backend process as described here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-April/098272.html
The individual index file encodes the summary and module information
required for implementing the importing/exporting decisions made
for a given module in the thin link step.
This is in place of the current mechanism that uses the combined index
to make importing decisions in each back end independently. It is an
enabler for doing global summary based optimizations in the thin link
step (which will be recorded in the individual index files), and reduces
the size of the index that must be sent to each backend process, and
the amount of work to scan it in the backends.
Rather than create entirely new ModuleSummaryIndex structures (and all
the included unique_ptrs) for each backend index file, a map is created
to record all of the GUID and summary pointers needed for a particular
index file. The IndexBitcodeWriter walks this map instead of the full
index (hiding the details of managing the appropriate summary iteration
in a new iterator subclass). This is more efficient than walking the
entire combined index and filtering out just the needed summaries during
each backend bitcode index write.
Depends on D19481.
Reviewers: joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits, joker.eph
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19556
llvm-svn: 268627
If the linker requested to preserve a linkonce function, we should
honor this even if we drop all uses.
We explicitely avoid turning them into weak_odr (unlike the first
version of this patch in r267644), because the codegen can be
different on Darwin: because of `llvm::canBeOmittedFromSymbolTable()`
we may emit the symbol as weak_def_can_be_hidden instead of
weak_definition.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 268607
This reverts commit r267644. Turning linkonce_odr into weak_odr is
a sementic change on Darwin: because of
`llvm::canBeOmittedFromSymbolTable()` we may emit the symbol as
weak_def_can_be_hidden instead of weak_definition.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 268606
This was a remaining of a previous scheme where some IPOs were taking
place before we enter this code. This is not relevant anymore.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 268605
This reverts commit r267657, r267656, and r267655.
The test does not pass on multiple bots, I'm unsure why yet but let's unbreak them.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 267664
Summary:
If the linker requested to preserve a linkonce function, we should
honor this even if we drop all uses.
Reviewers: dexonsmith
Subscribers: llvm-commits, joker.eph
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19527
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 267644
If the linker specifically requested for a linkonce to be preserved,
we need to make sure we won't drop it even if all the uses in the
current module disappear.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 267543
Peter Collingbourne