ViewLikeOpInterfaces introduce new aliases that need to be added to the alias
list. This is necessary to place deallocs in the right positions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83044
This pass removes redundant dialect-independent Copy operations in different
situations like the following:
%from = ...
%to = ...
... (no user/alias for %to)
copy(%from, %to)
... (no user/alias for %from)
dealloc %from
use(%to)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82757
Summary: The current BufferPlacement implementation does not support
nested region control flow. This CL adds support for nested regions via
the RegionBranchOpInterface and the detection of branch-like
(ReturnLike) terminators inside nested regions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81926
Summary: The patch fixes an off by one error in the method collapseParallelLoops. It ensures the same normalized bound is used for the computation of the division and the remainder.
Reviewers: herhut
Reviewed By: herhut
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, aartbik, liufengdb, stephenneuendorffer, Joonsoo, grosul1, Kayjukh, jurahul, msifontes
Tags: #mlir
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82634
When there is a mix of affine load/store and non-affine operations (e.g. std.load, std.store),
affine-loop-fusion ignores the present of non-affine ops, thus changing the program semantics.
E.g. we have a program of three affine loops operating on the same memref in which one of them uses std.load and std.store, as follows.
```
affine.for
affine.store %1
affine.for
std.load %1
std.store %1
affine.for
affine.load %1
affine.store %1
```
affine-loop-fusion will produce the following result which changed the program semantics:
```
affine.for
std.load %1
std.store %1
affine.for
affine.store %1
affine.load %1
affine.store %1
```
This patch is to fix the above problem by checking non-affine users of the memref that are between the source and destination nodes of interest.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82158
This revision removes the TypeConverter parameter passed to the apply* methods, and instead moves the responsibility of region type conversion to patterns. The types of a region can be converted using the 'convertRegionTypes' method, which acts similarly to the existing 'applySignatureConversion'. This method ensures that all blocks within, and including those moved into, a region will have the block argument types converted using the provided converter.
This has the benefit of making more of the legalization logic controlled by patterns, instead of being handled explicitly by the driver. It also opens up the possibility to support multiple type conversions at some point in the future.
This revision also adds a new utility class `FailureOr<T>` that provides a LogicalResult friendly facility for returning a failure or a valid result value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81681
Traditionally patterns have always had the root operation kind hardcoded to a specific operation name. This has worked well for quite some time, but it has certain limitations that make it undesirable. For example, some lowering have the same implementation for many different operations types with a few lowering entire dialects using the same pattern implementation. This problem has led to several "solutions":
a) Provide a template implementation to the user so that they can instantiate it for each operation combination, generally requiring the inclusion of the auto-generated operation definition file.
b) Use a non-templated pattern that allows for providing the name of the operation to match
- No one ever does this, because enumerating operation names can be cumbersome and so this quickly devolves into solution a.
This revision removes the restriction that patterns have a hardcoded root type, and allows for a class patterns that could match "any" operation type. The major downside of root-agnostic patterns is that they make certain pattern analyses more difficult, so it is still very highly encouraged that an operation specific pattern be used whenever possible.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82066
This class enables for abstracting more of the details for the rewrite process, and will allow for clients to apply specific cost models to the pattern list. This allows for DialectConversion and the GreedyPatternRewriter to share the same underlying matcher implementation. This also simplifies the plumbing necessary to support dynamic patterns.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81985
We previously weren't properly updating the SCC iterator when nodes were removed, leading to asan failures in certain situations. This commit adds a CallGraphSCC class and defers operation deletion until inlining has finished.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81984
Similarly to `scf::ForOp`, introduce additional `function_ref` arguments to
`::build` functions of SCF `ParallelOp` and `ReduceOp`. The provided functions
will be called to construct the body of the respective operations while
constructing the operation itself. Exercise them in LoopUtils.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81872
It is quite common for the same type to be converted many types throughout the conversion process, and there isn't any good reason why we aren't caching that result. Especially given that we currently use identity conversion to signify legality. This revision also adds a few additional helpers to TypeConverter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81679
allocations cannot be moved freely and can remain in divergent control flow.
The current BufferPlacement pass does not support allocation nodes that carry
additional dependencies (like in the case of dynamic shaped types). These
allocations can often not be moved freely and in turn might remain in divergent
control-flow branches. This requires a different strategy with respect to block
arguments and aliases. This CL adds additinal functionality to support
allocation nodes in divergent control flow while avoiding memory leaks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79850
This patch changes the fusion algorithm so that after fusing two loop nests
we revisit previously visited nodes so that they are considered again for
fusion in the context of the new fused loop nest.
Reviewed By: bondhugula
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81609
This parameter gives the developers the freedom to choose their desired function
signature conversion for preparing their functions for buffer placement. It is
introduced for BufferAssignmentFuncOpConverter, and also for
BufferAssignmentReturnOpConverter, and BufferAssignmentCallOpConverter to adapt
the return and call operations with the selected function signature conversion.
If the parameter is set, buffer placement won't also deallocate the returned
buffers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81137
This revision adds a helper function to hoist vector.transfer_read /
vector.transfer_write pairs out of immediately enclosing scf::ForOp
iteratively, if the following conditions are true:
1. The 2 ops access the same memref with the same indices.
2. All operands are invariant under the enclosing scf::ForOp.
3. No uses of the memref either dominate the transfer_read or are
dominated by the transfer_write (i.e. no aliasing between the write and
the read across the loop)
To improve hoisting opportunities, call the `moveLoopInvariantCode` helper
function on the candidate loop above which to hoist. Hoisting the transfers
results in scf::ForOp yielding the value that originally transited through
memory.
This revision additionally exposes `moveLoopInvariantCode` as a helper in
LoopUtils.h and updates SliceAnalysis to support return scf::For values and
allow hoisting across multiple scf::ForOps.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81199
This patch enables affine loop fusion for loops with affine vector loads
and stores. For that, we only had to use affine memory op interfaces in
LoopFusionUtils.cpp and Utils.cpp so that vector loads and stores are
also taken into account.
Reviewed By: andydavis1, ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80971
Dialect conversion infrastructure supports 1->N type conversions by requiring
individual conversions to provide facilities to generate operations
retrofitting N values into 1 of the original type when N > 1. This
functionality can also be used to materialize explicit "cast"-like operations,
but it did not support 1->1 type conversions until now. Modify TypeConverter to
support materialization of cast operations for 1-1 conversions.
This also makes materialization specification more extensible following the
same pattern as type conversions. Instead of overloading a virtual function,
users or subclasses of TypeConversion can now register type-specific
materialization callbacks that will be called in order for the given type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79729
Add BufferAssignmentCallOpConverter as a pattern rewriter for Buffer
Placement. It matches the signature of the caller operation with the callee
after rewriting the callee with FunctionAndBlockSignatureConverter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80785
Buffer placement can now operates on functions that return buffers. These
buffers escape from the deallocation phase of buffer placement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80696
PatternRewriter has support for erasing a Block from its parent region, but
this feature has not been implemented for ConversionPatternRewriter that needs
to keep track of and be able to undo block actions. Introduce support for
undoing block erasure in the ConversionPatternRewriter by marking all the ops
it contains for erasure and by detaching the block from its parent region. The
detached block is stored in the action description and is not actually deleted
until the rewrites are applied.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80135
Dialect conversion infrastructure may roll back op creation by erasing the
operations in the reverse order of their creation. While this guarantees uses
of values will be deleted before their definitions, this does not guarantee
that a parent operation will not be deleted before its child. (This may happen
in case of block inlining or if child operations, such as terminators, are
created in the parent's `build` function before the parent itself.) Handle the
parent/child relationship between ops by removing all child ops from the blocks
before erasing the parent. The child ops remain live, detached from a block,
and will be safely destroyed in their turn, which may come later than that of
the parent.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80134
This patch introduces interfaces for read and write ops with affine
restrictions. I used `read`/`write` intead of `load`/`store` for the
interfaces so that they can also be implemented by dma ops.
For now, they are only implemented by affine.load, affine.store,
affine.vector_load and affine.vector_store.
For testing purposes, this patch also migrates affine loop fusion and
required analysis to use the new interfaces. No other changes are made
beyond that.
Co-authored-by: Alex Zinenko <zinenko@google.com>
Reviewed By: bondhugula, ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79829
Making these two converters more generic. FunctionAndBlockSignatureConverter now
moves only memref results (after type conversion) to the function argument and
keeps other legal function results unchanged. NonVoidToVoidReturnOpConverter is
renamed to NoBufferOperandsReturnOpConverter. It removes only the buffer
operands from the operands of the converted ReturnOp and inserts CopyOps to copy
each buffer to the target function argument.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79329
Summary:
This makes a common pattern of
`dyn_cast_or_null<OpTy>(v.getDefiningOp())` more concise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79681
This dialect contains various structured control flow operaitons, not only
loops, reflect this in the name. Drop the Ops suffix for consistency with other
dialects.
Note that this only moves the files and changes the C++ namespace from 'loop'
to 'scf'. The visible IR prefix remains the same and will be updated
separately. The conversions will also be updated separately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79578
The list of destination load ops while evaluating producer-consumer
fusion wasn't being maintained as a set, and as such, duplicate load ops
were being added to it. Although this is harmless correctness-wise, it's
a killer efficiency-wise and it prevents interesting/useful fusions
(including for eg. reshapes into a matmul). The reason the latter
fusions would be missed is that a slice union would be unnecessarily
needed due to the duplicate load ops on a memref added to the 'dst
loads' list. Since slice union is unimplemented for the local var case,
a single destination load op that leads to local vars (like a floordiv /
mod producing fusion), a common case, would not get fused due to an
unnecessary union being tried with itself. (The union would actually be
the same thing but we would bail out.)
Besides the above, this would also significantly speed up fusion as all
the unnecessary slice computations / unions, checks, etc. due to the
duplicates go away.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79547
Essentially takes the lld/Common/Threads.h wrappers and moves them to
the llvm/Support/Paralle.h algorithm header.
The changes are:
- Remove policy parameter, since all clients use `par`.
- Rename the methods to `parallelSort` etc to match LLVM style, since
they are no longer C++17 pstl compatible.
- Move algorithms from llvm::parallel:: to llvm::, since they have
"parallel" in the name and are no longer overloads of the regular
algorithms.
- Add range overloads
- Use the sequential algorithm directly when 1 thread is requested
(skips task grouping)
- Fix the index type of parallelForEachN to size_t. Nobody in LLVM was
using any other parameter, and it made overload resolution hard for
for_each_n(par, 0, foo.size(), ...) because 0 is int, not size_t.
Remove Threads.h and update LLD for that.
This is a prerequisite for parallel public symbol processing in the PDB
library, which is in LLVM.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, aganea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79390
Summary:
Adds the loop unroll transformation for loop::ForOp.
Adds support for promoting the body of single-iteration loop::ForOps into its containing block.
Adds check tests for loop::ForOps with dynamic and static lower/upper bounds and step.
Care was taken to share code (where possible) with the AffineForOp unroll transformation to ease maintenance and potential future transition to a LoopLike construct on which loop transformations for different loop types can implemented.
Reviewers: ftynse, nicolasvasilache
Reviewed By: ftynse
Subscribers: bondhugula, mgorny, zzheng, mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, aartbik, liufengdb, Joonsoo, grosul1, frgossen, Kayjukh, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79184
This revision adds support for merging identical blocks, or those with the same operations that branch to the same successors. Operands that mismatch between the different blocks are replaced with new block arguments added to the merged block.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79134
This allows for walking the operations nested directly within a region, without traversing nested regions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79056
- Exports MLIR targets to be used out-of-tree.
- mimicks `add_clang_library` and `add_flang_library`.
- Fixes libMLIR.so
After https://reviews.llvm.org/D77515 libMLIR.so was no longer containing
any object files. We originally had a cludge there that made it work with
the static initalizers and when switchting away from that to the way the
clang shlib does it, I noticed that MLIR doesn't create a `obj.{name}` target,
and doesn't export it's targets to `lib/cmake/mlir`.
This is due to MLIR using `add_llvm_library` under the hood, which adds
the target to `llvmexports`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78773
[MLIR] Fix libMLIR.so and LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB
Primarily, this patch moves all mlir references to LLVM libraries into
either LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS or LINK_COMPONENTS. This enables magic in
the llvm cmake files to automatically replace reference to LLVM components
with references to libLLVM.so when necessary. Among other things, this
completes fixing libMLIR.so, which has been broken for some configurations
since D77515.
Unlike previously, the pattern is now that mlir libraries should almost
always use add_mlir_library. Previously, some libraries still used
add_llvm_library. However, this confuses the export of targets for use
out of tree because libraries specified with add_llvm_library are exported
by LLVM. Instead users which don't need/can't be linked into libMLIR.so
can specify EXCLUDE_FROM_LIBMLIR
A common error mode is linking with LLVM libraries outside of LINK_COMPONENTS.
This almost always results in symbol confusion or multiply defined options
in LLVM when the same object file is included as a static library and
as part of libLLVM.so. To catch these errors more directly, there's now
mlir_check_all_link_libraries.
To simplify usage of add_mlir_library, we assume that all mlir
libraries depend on LLVMSupport, so it's not necessary to separately specify
it.
tested with:
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=on,
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=off + LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB,
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=off + LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB + LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB.
By: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79067
[MLIR] Move from using target_link_libraries to LINK_LIBS
This allows us to correctly generate dependencies for derived targets,
such as targets which are created for object libraries.
By: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79243
Three commits have been squashed to avoid intermediate build breakage.
The current BufferPlacement implementation tries to find Alloc and Dealloc
operations in order to move them. However, this is a tight coupling to
standard-dialect ops which has been removed in this CL.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78993
Julian Gross