Summary:
This patch introduces the skeleton of the constexpr interpreter,
capable of evaluating a simple constexpr functions consisting of
if statements. The interpreter is described in more detail in the
RFC. Further patches will add more features.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jfb, rsmith
Subscribers: bruno, uenoku, ldionne, Tyker, thegameg, tschuett, dexonsmith, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64146
llvm-svn: 371834
Breaks BUILD_SHARED_LIBS build, introduces cycles in library dependency
graphs. (clangInterp depends on clangAST which depends on clangInterp)
This reverts r370839, which is an yet another recommit of D64146.
llvm-svn: 370874
Summary:
This patch introduces the skeleton of the constexpr interpreter,
capable of evaluating a simple constexpr functions consisting of
if statements. The interpreter is described in more detail in the
RFC. Further patches will add more features.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jfb, rsmith
Subscribers: bruno, uenoku, ldionne, Tyker, thegameg, tschuett, dexonsmith, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64146
llvm-svn: 370839
Summary:
This patch introduces the skeleton of the constexpr interpreter,
capable of evaluating a simple constexpr functions consisting of
if statements. The interpreter is described in more detail in the
RFC. Further patches will add more features.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jfb, rsmith
Subscribers: bruno, uenoku, ldionne, Tyker, thegameg, tschuett, dexonsmith, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64146
llvm-svn: 370636
Summary:
This patch introduces the skeleton of the constexpr interpreter,
capable of evaluating a simple constexpr functions consisting of
if statements. The interpreter is described in more detail in the
RFC. Further patches will add more features.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jfb, rsmith
Subscribers: bruno, uenoku, ldionne, Tyker, thegameg, tschuett, dexonsmith, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64146
llvm-svn: 370584
Summary:
This patch introduces the skeleton of the constexpr interpreter,
capable of evaluating a simple constexpr functions consisting of
if statements. The interpreter is described in more detail in the
RFC. Further patches will add more features.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jfb, rsmith
Subscribers: bruno, uenoku, ldionne, Tyker, thegameg, tschuett, dexonsmith, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64146
llvm-svn: 370531
Summary:
This patch introduces the skeleton of the constexpr interpreter,
capable of evaluating a simple constexpr functions consisting of
if statements. The interpreter is described in more detail in the
RFC. Further patches will add more features.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jfb, rsmith
Subscribers: bruno, uenoku, ldionne, Tyker, thegameg, tschuett, dexonsmith, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64146
llvm-svn: 370476
This patch adds a `-fdeclare-opencl-builtins` command line option to
the clang frontend. This enables clang to verify OpenCL C builtin
function declarations using a fast StringMatcher lookup, instead of
including the opencl-c.h file with the `-finclude-default-header`
option. This avoids the large parse time penalty of the header file.
This commit only adds the basic infrastructure and some of the OpenCL
builtins. It does not cover all builtins defined by the various OpenCL
specifications. As such, it is not a replacement for
`-finclude-default-header` yet.
RFC: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-November/060041.html
Co-authored-by: Pierre Gondois
Co-authored-by: Joey Gouly
Co-authored-by: Sven van Haastregt
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60763
llvm-svn: 362371
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Remove now-vestigial dumpType and dumpBareDeclRef methods. The old
tablegen generated code used to expect them to be present, but the new
generated code has no such requirement.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55492
llvm-svn: 350958
Currently, if clang-tblgen is run without a mode option, it defaults
to the first mode in its 'enum Action', which happens to be
-gen-clang-attr-classes. I think it makes more sense for it to behave
the same way as llvm-tblgen, i.e. print a diagnostic dump if it's not
given any more specific instructions.
I've also added the same -dump-json that llvm-tblgen supports. This
means any tblgen command line (whether llvm- or clang-) can be
mechanically turned into one that processes the same input into JSON.
Reviewers: nhaehnle
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50771
llvm-svn: 340390
Summary:
This adds an option "-gen-clang-data-collectors" to the Clang TableGen
that is used to generate StmtDataCollectors.inc.
Reviewers: arphaman, teemperor!
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37383
llvm-svn: 312634
This is a recommit of r300539 that was reverted in r300543 due to test failures.
The original commit message is displayed below:
The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to
multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to
be supported by the pragma:
- It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file.
- It must be documented.
- It must not be late parsed.
- It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009
llvm-svn: 300556
The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to
multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to
be supported by the pragma:
- It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file.
- It must be documented.
- It must not be late parsed.
- It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009
llvm-svn: 300539
The core of the change is supposed to be NFC, however it also fixes
what I believe was an undefined behavior when calling:
va_start(ValueArgs, Desc);
with Desc being a StringRef.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25342
llvm-svn: 283671
remark flags. For now I'm checking in a copy of the built documentation, but we
can replace this with a placeholder (as we do for the attributes reference
documentation) once we enable building this server-side.
llvm-svn: 281192
The patch is generated using this command:
$ tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
work/llvm/tools/clang
To reduce churn, not touching namespaces spanning less than 10 lines.
llvm-svn: 240270
Clean up the __has_attribute implementation without modifying its behavior.
Replaces the tablegen-driven AttrSpellings.inc, which lived in the lexing layer with AttrHasAttributeImpl.inc, which lives in the basic layer. Updates the preprocessor to call through to this new functionality which can take additional information into account (such as scopes and syntaxes).
Expose the ability for parts of the compiler to ask whether an attribute is supported for a given spelling (including scope), syntax, triple and language options.
llvm-svn: 205181
Replaces the tablegen-driven AttrSpellings.inc, which lived in the lexing layer with AttrHasAttributeImpl.inc, which lives in the basic layer. Updates the preprocessor to call through to this new functionality which can take additional information into account (such as scopes and syntaxes).
Expose the ability for parts of the compiler to ask whether an attribute is supported for a given spelling (including scope), syntax, triple and language options.
llvm-svn: 204952
This patch adds some very, very sparse initial documentation for some attributes. Additional effort from attribute authors is greatly appreciated.
llvm-svn: 201515
To declare or define reserved identifers is undefined behaviour in standard
C++. This needs to be addressed in compiler-rt before it can be used in LLVM.
See the list discussion for details.
This reverts commit r198858.
llvm-svn: 198885
important for thread safety attributes, which contain expressions that were
not being visited, and were thus invisible to various tools. There are now
Visit*Attr methods that can be overridden for every attribute.
llvm-svn: 198224
which we don't think can't have one, only allow it in the tiny number of
attributes which opts into this weird parse rule.
I've manually checked that the handlers for all these attributes can in fact
cope with an identifier as the argument. This is still somewhat terrible; we
should move more fully towards picking the parsing rules based on the
attribute, and make the Parse -> Sema interface more type-safe.
llvm-svn: 193295
The CMake build was still using it because I forgot to s/CLANG/LLVM/ in
the tablegen() call. The Makefile build is already using llvm-tblgen.
llvm-svn: 184192
This change partly addresses a heinous problem we have with the
parsing of attribute arguments that are a lone identifier. Previously,
we would end up parsing the 'align' attribute of this as an expression
"(Align)":
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align((Align)))) char storage[Size];
};
while this would parse as a "parameter name" 'Align':
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align(Align))) char storage[Size];
};
The code that handles the alignment attribute would completely ignore
the parameter name, so the while the first of these would do what's
expected, the second would silently be equivalent to
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align)) char storage[Size];
};
i.e., use the maximal alignment rather than the specified alignment.
Address this by sniffing the "Args" provided in the TableGen
description of attributes. If the first argument is "obviously"
something that should be treated as an expression (rather than an
identifier to be matched later), parse it as an expression.
Fixes <rdar://problem/13700933>.
llvm-svn: 180973
This change partly addresses a heinous problem we have with the
parsing of attribute arguments that are a lone identifier. Previously,
we would end up parsing the 'align' attribute of this as an expression
"(Align)":
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align((Align)))) char storage[Size];
};
while this would parse as a "parameter name" 'Align':
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align(Align))) char storage[Size];
};
The code that handles the alignment attribute would completely ignore
the parameter name, so the while the first of these would do what's
expected, the second would silently be equivalent to
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align)) char storage[Size];
};
i.e., use the maximal alignment rather than the specified alignment.
Address this by sniffing the "Args" provided in the TableGen
description of attributes. If the first argument is "obviously"
something that should be treated as an expression (rather than an
identifier to be matched later), parse it as an expression.
Fixes <rdar://problem/13700933>.
llvm-svn: 180970
This change introduces a 'kind' attribute for the <Para> tag, that captures the
kind of the parent block command.
For example:
\todo Meow.
used to be just <Para>Meow.</Para>, but now it is
<Para kind="todo">Meow.</Para>
llvm-svn: 174216
Nandor Licker