This option behaves in a similar spirit as -save-temps and writes
internal llvm statistics in json format to a file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24820
llvm-svn: 282426
The fix in r282148 was not enough to fix the following error:
/home/llvmbb/llvm-build-dir/clang-sphinx-docs/llvm/src/tools/clang/docs/CommandGuide/clang.rst:338:
WARNING: unknown option: -flto=full
on the sphinx bot:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-sphinx-docs/builds/16313
(not reproducible locally).
This time, simply remove the option reference.
llvm-svn: 282151
Summary: Add some user facing documentation on ThinLTO and how to use it.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24806
llvm-svn: 282089
Flesh out the section on interpreting coverage reports, mention the
coverage export feature, and add notes on how to build llvm with
coverage turned on.
llvm-svn: 281988
This patch adds an entry for "-rtlib" in the output of `man clang` and `clang -help`.
Patch by Lei Zhang!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24069
llvm-svn: 281440
Original commit message:
Add -fdiagnostics-show-hotness
Summary:
I've recently added the ability for optimization remarks to include the
hotness of the corresponding code region. This uses PGO and allows
filtering of the optimization remarks by relevance. The idea was first
discussed here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/98334
The general goal is to produce a YAML file with the remarks. Then, an
external tool could dynamically filter these by hotness and perhaps by
other things.
That said it makes sense to also expose this at the more basic level
where we just include the hotness info with each optimization remark.
For example, in D22694, the clang flag was pretty useful to measure the
overhead of the additional analyses required to include hotness.
(Without the flag we don't even run the analyses.)
For the record, Hal has already expressed support for the idea of this
patch on IRC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23284
llvm-svn: 281293
Summary:
I've recently added the ability for optimization remarks to include the
hotness of the corresponding code region. This uses PGO and allows
filtering of the optimization remarks by relevance. The idea was first
discussed here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/98334
The general goal is to produce a YAML file with the remarks. Then, an
external tool could dynamically filter these by hotness and perhaps by
other things.
That said it makes sense to also expose this at the more basic level
where we just include the hotness info with each optimization remark.
For example, in D22694, the clang flag was pretty useful to measure the
overhead of the additional analyses required to include hotness.
(Without the flag we don't even run the analyses.)
For the record, Hal has already expressed support for the idea of this
patch on IRC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23284
llvm-svn: 281276
Fixed incorrect docs that referred to:
objc_arc_weak_unavailable
when it should be:
objc_arc_weak_reference_unavailable
Patch by: Sean McBride!
llvm-svn: 281227
remark flags. For now I'm checking in a copy of the built documentation, but we
can replace this with a placeholder (as we do for the attributes reference
documentation) once we enable building this server-side.
llvm-svn: 281192
This adds support for modules that require (non-)freestanding
environment, such as the compiler builtin mm_malloc submodule.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23871
llvm-svn: 280613
This adds support for modules that require (no-)gnu-inline-asm
environment, such as the compiler builtin cpuid submodule.
This is the gnu-inline-asm variant of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23871
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23905
rdar://problem/26931199
llvm-svn: 280159
to CC1, which are translated to function attributes and can e.g. be mapped on
build attributes FP_exceptions and FP_denormal. Setting these build attributes
allows better selection of floating point libraries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23840
llvm-svn: 280064
In this mode, there is no need to load any module map and the programmer can
simply use "@import" syntax to load the module directly from a prebuilt
module path. When loading from prebuilt module path, we don't support
rebuilding of the module files and we ignore compatible configuration
mismatches.
rdar://27290316
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23125
llvm-svn: 279096
Summary:
This is required for compliance with the Mozilla style guide.
This is a rebase+minor change of Birunthan Mohanathas's patch
Reviewers: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits, opilarium
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23317
llvm-svn: 278121
This reverts commit r275895 in order to address some post-commit review
feedback from Eric Christopher (see: the list thread for r275895).
llvm-svn: 276936
Compute an effective target triple exactly once in ConstructJob(), and
then simply pass around references to it. This eliminates wasteful
re-computation of effective triples (e.g in getARMFloatABI()).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22290
llvm-svn: 275895
A number of warnings still remain, but these were the last of the
"unlexable code"-related ones (AFAICT).
I changed a few examples in docs/UsersManual.rst to showcase
-Wextra-tokens because it's already documented (-Wmultichar isn't), and
the sphinx C lexer apparently can't handle char literals like 'ab'. It
seemed like a better overall approach than just marking the code blocks
as none or console.
llvm-svn: 273232
The reason is that this (a) seems to work just fine and (b) useful when building stuff with
sanitizer+coverage, but need to exclude the sanitizer for a particular source file.
llvm-svn: 272717
Summary:
This is similar to other loop pragmas like 'vectorize'. Currently it
only has state values: distribute(enable) and distribute(disable). When
one of these is specified the corresponding loop metadata is generated:
!{!"llvm.loop.distribute.enable", i1 true/false}
As a result, loop distribution will be attempted on the loop even if
Loop Distribution in not enabled globally. Analogously, with 'disable'
distribution can be turned off for an individual loop even when the pass
is otherwise enabled.
There are some slight differences compared to the existing loop pragmas.
1. There is no 'assume_safety' variant which makes its handling slightly
different from 'vectorize'/'interleave'.
2. Unlike the existing loop pragmas, it does not have a corresponding
numeric pragma like 'vectorize' -> 'vectorize_width'. So for the
consistency checks in CheckForIncompatibleAttributes we don't need to
check it against other pragmas. We just need to check for duplicates of
the same pragma.
Reviewers: rsmith, dexonsmith, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: bob.wilson, cfe-commits, hfinkel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19403
llvm-svn: 272656
Mention that the code coverage tool becomes less precise whenever
unpredictable changes in control flow occur.
Thanks to Sean Silva for pointing this out!
llvm-svn: 271902
Mike Aizatsky