(while computing user conversion sequences), make sure that a result
of class type is a complete class type. Had we gone through
ActOnCallExpr, this would have happened when we built the CallExpr.
Fixes PR8425.
llvm-svn: 119005
that the class type into which the pointer points be complete, even
though the standard requires it. GCC/EDG do not require a complete
type here, so we're calling this a problem with the standard. Fixes
PR8328.
llvm-svn: 116429
ensure that we complete the type when we need to look at constructors
during reference binding.
When determining whether the two types involved in reference binding
are reference-compatible, reference-related, etc., do not complete the
type of the reference itself because it is not necessary to determine
well-formedness of the program. Complete the type that we are binding
to, since that can affect whether we know about a derived-to-base
conversion.
Re-fixes PR7080.
llvm-svn: 103283
are reference-compatible, reference-related, etc., do not complete the
type of the reference itself because it is not necessary to determine
well-formedness of the program. Complete the type that we are binding
to, since that can affect whether we know about a derived-to-base
conversion.
Fixes PR7080.
llvm-svn: 103220
that the type we're copying is complete.
Boost.Regex now builds, although it's failing its regression tests
with our favorite "Sema doesn't consider destructor as used."
assertion.
llvm-svn: 102271
therefore not creating ElaboratedTypes, which are still pretty-printed
with the written tag).
Most of these testcase changes were done by script, so don't feel too
sorry for my fingers.
llvm-svn: 98149
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
(without complaining if it fails) to get proper semantics: reference
binding with a derived-to-base conversion and the enumeration of
constructors for user-defined conversions. There are probably more
cases to fix, but my prior attempt at statically ensuring that
complete-type checking always happens failed. Perhaps I'll try again.
With this change, Clang can parse include/llvm/*.h!
llvm-svn: 86129
template<typename T>
struct X {
struct Inner;
};
template struct X<int>::Inner;
This change is larger than it looks because it also fixes some
a problem with nested-name-specifiers and tags. We weren't requiring
the DeclContext associated with the scope specifier of a tag to be
complete. Therefore, when looking for something like "struct
X<int>::Inner", we weren't instantiating X<int>.
This, naturally, uncovered a problem with member pointers, where we
were requiring the left-hand side of a member pointer access
expression (e.g., x->*) to be a complete type. However, this is wrong:
the semantics of this expression does not require a complete type (EDG
agrees).
Stuart vouched for me. Blame him.
llvm-svn: 71756
Douglas Gregor