Summary:
This fixes PR33561 and PR34185.
Don't store pending template instantiations for late-parsed templates in
the normal PendingInstantiations queue. Instead, use a separate list
that will only be parsed and instantiated at end of TU when late
template parsing actually works and doesn't infinite loop.
Reviewers: rsmith, thakis, hans
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44846
llvm-svn: 328567
This relands r326965.
There was a null dereference in typo correction that was triggered in
Sema/diagnose_if.c. We are not always in a function scope when doing
typo correction. The fix is to add a null check.
LLVM's optimizer made it hard to find this bug. I wrote it up in a
not-very-well-editted blog post here:
http://qinsb.blogspot.com/2018/03/ub-will-delete-your-null-checks.html
llvm-svn: 327334
This reverts r326965. It seems to have caused repeating test failures in
clang/test/Sema/diagnose_if.c on some buildbots.
I cannot reproduce the problem, and it's not immediately obvious what
the problem is, so let's revert to green.
llvm-svn: 326974
Summary:
Before this patch, Sema pre-allocated a FunctionScopeInfo and kept it in
the first, always present element of the FunctionScopes stack. This
meant that Sema::getCurFunction would return a pointer to this
pre-allocated object when parsing code outside a function body. This is
pretty much always a bug, so this patch moves the pre-allocated object
into a separate unique_ptr. This should make bugs like PR36536 a lot
more obvious.
As you can see from this patch, there were a number of places that
unconditionally assumed they were always called inside a function.
However, there are also many places that null checked the result of
getCurFunction(), so I think this is a reasonable direction.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44039
llvm-svn: 326965
Summary:
This provides no measurable build speedup, but it reinstates an
optimization from r112038 that was lost in r179618. It requires moving
CapturedScopeInfo::Capture out to clang::sema, which might be too
general since we have plenty of other Capture records in BlockDecl and
other AST nodes.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44221
llvm-svn: 326957
When parsing comments, for example, for -Wdocumentation, slightly different
behaviour occurs when -fparse-all-comments is specified. However, these
differences are subtle:
1. All comments are saved during parsing, regardless of whether they are doc
comments or not.
2. "Maybe-doc" comments, like <, !, etc, are saved as such, instead of marking
them as ordinary comments. The maybe-doc type of comment is never saved
otherwise. (Warning on these is the impetus of -Wdocumentation.)
3. All comments are treated as doc comments in ASTContext, even if they are ordinary.
This change moves the logic for checking CommentOptions.ParseAllComments closer
to where it has an effect. The overall logic is unchanged, but checks of the
ParseAllComments flag are now done where the effect will be clearer.
Subscribers: cfe-commits
llvm-svn: 326512
Original change:
[NFC] Move CommentOpts checks to the call sites that depend on it.
When parsing comments, for example, for -Wdocumentation, slightly different
behaviour occurs when -fparse-all-comments is specified. However, these
differences are subtle:
1. All comments are saved during parsing, regardless of whether they are doc comments or not.
2. "Maybe-doc" comments, like //<, //!, etc, are saved as such, instead of marking them as ordinary comments. The maybe-doc type of comment is never saved otherwise. (Warning on these is the impetus of -Wdocumentation.)
3. All comments are treated as doc comments in ASTContext, even if they are ordinary.
This change moves the logic for checking CommentOptions.ParseAllComments closer
to where it has an effect. The overall logic is unchanged, but checks of the
ParseAllComments flag are now done where the effect will be clearer.
llvm-svn: 326508
When parsing comments, for example, for -Wdocumentation, slightly different
behaviour occurs when -fparse-all-comments is specified. However, these
differences are subtle:
1. All comments are saved during parsing, regardless of whether they are doc
comments or not.
2. "Maybe-doc" comments, like //<, //!, etc, are saved as such, instead of
marking them as ordinary comments. The maybe-doc type of comment is never
saved otherwise. (Warning on these is the impetus of -Wdocumentation.)
3. All comments are treated as doc comments in ASTContext, even if they are
ordinary.
This change moves the logic for checking CommentOptions.ParseAllComments closer
to where it has an effect. The overall logic is unchanged, but checks of the
ParseAllComments flag are now done where the effect will be clearer.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43663
llvm-svn: 326501
This patch adds a base-class called TemplateInstantiationObserver which gets
notified whenever a template instantiation is entered or exited during
semantic analysis. This is a base class used to implement the template
profiling and debugging tool called
Templight (https://github.com/mikael-s-persson/templight).
The patch also makes a few more changes:
* ActiveTemplateInstantiation class is moved out of the Sema class (so it can be used with inclusion of Sema.h).
* CreateFrontendAction function in front-end utilities is given external linkage (not longer a hidden static function).
* TemplateInstObserverChain data member added to Sema class to hold the list of template-inst observers.
* Notifications to the template-inst observer are added at the key places where templates are instantiated.
Patch by: Abel Sinkovics!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D5767
llvm-svn: 324808
We could in principle support such pack expansion, using techniques similar to
what we do for pack expansion of lambdas, but it's not clear it's worthwhile.
For now at least, cleanly reject these cases rather than crashing.
llvm-svn: 324160
GCC's attribute 'target', in addition to being an optimization hint,
also allows function multiversioning. We currently have the former
implemented, this is the latter's implementation.
This works by enabling functions with the same name/signature to coexist,
so that they can all be emitted. Multiversion state is stored in the
FunctionDecl itself, and SemaDecl manages the definitions.
Note that it ends up having to permit redefinition of functions so
that they can all be emitted. Additionally, all versions of the function
must be emitted, so this also manages that.
Note that this includes some additional rules that GCC does not, since
defining something as a MultiVersion function after a usage has been made illegal.
The only 'history rewriting' that happens is if a function is emitted before
it has been converted to a multiversion'ed function, at which point its name
needs to be changed.
Function templates and virtual functions are NOT yet supported (not supported
in GCC either).
Additionally, constructors/destructors are disallowed, but the former is
planned.
llvm-svn: 322028
Summary:
The warning was initially introduced in D32914 by @thakis,
and the concerns were raised there, and later in rL302247
and PR33771.
I do believe that it makes sense to relax the diagnostic
e.g. in this case, when the expression originates from the
system header, which can not be modified. This prevents
adoption for the diagnostic for codebases which use pthreads
(`PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER`), gtest, etc.
As @malcolm.parsons suggests, it *may* make sense to also
not warn for the template types, but it is not obvious to
me how to do that in here.
Though, it still makes sense to complain about `NULL` macro.
While there, add more tests.
Reviewers: dblaikie, thakis, rsmith, rjmccall, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: thakis
Subscribers: Rakete1111, hans, cfe-commits, thakis, malcolm.parsons
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38954
llvm-svn: 316662
If a function or variable has a type with no linkage (and is not extern "C"),
any use of it requires a definition within the same translation unit; the idea
is that it is not possible to define the entity elsewhere, so any such use is
necessarily an error.
There is an exception, though: some types formally have no linkage but
nonetheless can be referenced from other translation units (for example, this
happens to anonymous structures defined within inline functions). For entities
with those types, we suppress the diagnostic except under -pedantic.
llvm-svn: 313729
This follows the scheme agreed with Nathan Sidwell, which can be found here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cxx-modules?action=AttachFile
This will be proposed to the itanium-cxx-abi list once we have some experience
with how well it works; the ABI for this TS should be considered unstable until
it is part of the Itanium C++ ABI.
llvm-svn: 312467
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The second recommit (r309106) was reverted because the "non-default #pragma
pack value chages the alignment of struct or union members in the included file"
warning proved to be too aggressive for external projects like Chromium
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=749197). This recommit
makes the problematic warning a non-default one, and gives it the
-Wpragma-pack-suspicious-include warning option.
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309386
The warning fires on non-suspicious code in Chromium. Reverting until a
solution is figured out.
> Recommit r308327 2nd time: Add a warning for missing
> '#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
>
> The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
> change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
> in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
> #includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
> alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
>
> Original message:
>
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309186
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309106
This seems to have broken the sanitizer-x86_64-linux buildbot. Reverting until
it's fixed, especially since this landed just before the 5.0 branch.
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308455
and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308441
Summary: When in incremental processing mode, we should never set `TUScope` to a nullptr otherwise any future lookups fail. We already have similar checks in the rest of the code, but we never hit this one because so far we didn't try to generate a module from the AST that Cling generates.
Reviewers: rsmith, v.g.vassilev
Reviewed By: v.g.vassilev
Subscribers: cfe-commits, v.g.vassilev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35536
llvm-svn: 308333
of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308327
rather than waiting until it's queried.
Currently this is only applied to local submodule visibility mode, as we don't
yet allocate storage for the owning module in non-local-visibility modules
compilations.
This reinstates r302965, reverted in r303037, with a fix for the reported
crash, which occurred when reparenting a local declaration to be a child of
a hidden imported declaration (specifically during template instantiation).
llvm-svn: 303224
module immediately
Also revert dependent r302969. This is leading to crashes.
Will provide more details reproduction instructions to Richard.
llvm-svn: 303037
rather than waiting until it's queried.
Currently this is only applied to local submodule visibility mode, as we don't
yet allocate storage for the owning module in non-local-visibility modules
compilations.
llvm-svn: 302965
Add an opt-in warning that fires when 0 is used as a null pointer.
gcc has this warning, and there's some demand for it.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D32914
llvm-svn: 302247
If some function template is instantiated during handling of OpenMP
code, currently it may cause crash of compiler because of trying of
capturing variables in non-capturing function scopes. Patch fixes this
bug.
llvm-svn: 301416
This is a recommit of r300539 that was reverted in r300543 due to test failures.
The original commit message is displayed below:
The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to
multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to
be supported by the pragma:
- It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file.
- It must be documented.
- It must not be late parsed.
- It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009
llvm-svn: 300556
The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to
multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to
be supported by the pragma:
- It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file.
- It must be documented.
- It must not be late parsed.
- It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009
llvm-svn: 300539
We need to address cases (breaking libc++) such as
template <class _Up> static int __test(...);
template<typename _Tp>
auto v = __test<_Tp>(0);
llvm-svn: 299956
- also replace direct equality checks against the ConstantEvaluated enumerator with isConstantEvaluted(), in anticipation of adding finer granularity to the various ConstantEvaluated contexts and reinstating certain restrictions on where lambda expressions can occur in C++17.
- update the clang tablegen backend that uses these Enumerators, and add the relevant scope where needed.
llvm-svn: 299316
potential capture list.
Fix Sema::getCurLambda() to return the innermost lambda scope when there
is a block enclosed in the lambda. Previously, the method would return a
nullptr in such cases, which would prevent a variable captured by the
enclosed block to be added to the lambda scope's potential capture list.
rdar://problem/28412462
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25556
llvm-svn: 296584
instantiation.
In preparation for converting the template stack to a more general context
stack (so we can include context notes for other kinds of context).
llvm-svn: 295686
Removed ndrange_t as Clang builtin type and added
as a struct type in the OpenCL header.
Use type name to do the Sema checking in enqueue_kernel
and modify IR generation accordingly.
Review: D28058
Patch by Dmitry Borisenkov!
llvm-svn: 295311
Reid Kleckner