Many LLVM-based tools already support response files (i.e. files
containing a list of options, specified with '@'). This change simply
updates the documentation and help text for some of these tools to
include it. I haven't attempted to fix all tools, just a selection that
I am interested in.
I've taken the opportunity to add some tests for --help behaviour, where
they were missing. We could expand these tests, but I don't think that's
within scope of this patch.
This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42233 and
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42236.
Reviewed by: grimar, MaskRay, jkorous
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63597
llvm-svn: 364036
The --print-size help text and documentation claimed that the size was
printed instead of the address, but this is incorrect. It is printed as
well as the address. This patch fixes this issue.
Reviewed by: MaskRay, mtrent, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63142
llvm-svn: 363136
llvm-nm reads a.out NOT stdin when no input file is specified. This
patch fixes the doc accordingly, and rephrases the surrounding sentence
slightly.
Reviewed by: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63135
llvm-svn: 363065
Summary:
This adds a new -no-weak flag to nm to hide weak symbols in its output.
This also adds a -W alias for this which is analogous to -U.
Patch by Keith Smiley
Reviewers: kastiglione, enderby, compnerd
Reviewed By: kastiglione
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48751
llvm-svn: 336126
Lots of blocks had "llvm" or "nasm" syntax types but either weren't following
the syntax, or the syntax has changed (and sphinx hasn't keep up) or the type
doesn't even exist (nasm?).
Other documents had :options: what were invalid. I only removed those that had
warnings, and left the ones that didn't, in order to follow the principle of
least surprise.
This is like this for ages, but the buildbot is now failing on errors. It may
take a while to upgrade the buildbot's sphinx, if that's even possible, but
that shouldn't stop us from getting docs updates (which seem down for quite
a while).
Also, we're not losing any syntax highlight, since when it doesn't parse, it
doesn't colour. Ie. those blocks are not being highlighted anyway.
I'm trying to get all docs in one go, so that it's easy to revert later if we
do fix, or at least easy to know what's to fix.
llvm-svn: 276109
James Henderson