This adds all remaining instructions that were still missing, mostly
privileged and semi-privileged system-level instructions. These are
provided for use with the assembler and disassembler only.
This brings the LLVM assembler / disassembler to parity with the
GNU binutils tools.
llvm-svn: 306876
Add the 16 access registers as LLVM registers. This allows removing
a lot of special cases in the assembler and disassembler where we
were handling access registers; this can all just use the generic
register code now.
Also add a bunch of instructions to operate on access registers,
for assembler/disassembler use only. No change in code generation
intended.
llvm-svn: 286283
Previously, an invalid instruction like:
foo %r1, %r0
would generate the rather odd error message:
....: error: unknown token in expression
foo %r1, %r0
^
We now get the more informative:
....: error: invalid instruction
foo %r1, %r0
^
The same would happen if an address were used where a register was expected.
We now get "invalid operand for instruction" instead.
llvm-svn: 182644
The idea is to make sure that:
(1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister()
is called and the token obviously isn't a register.
(2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..."
sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense.
(3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where
the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.).
(4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type,
but is not a valid register pair.
Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative
instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from
that class are accepted.
(4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs)
and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that
requires a pair).
While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the
operand class.
llvm-svn: 182643
Ulrich Weigand