Moving over to source-regex might be a good idea, but it’s not what we really want to test. Ideally, we would set a regex breakpoint to find the right line, then delete it and set one by file and line with the right line info from before.
llvm-svn: 179246
information about each variable that needs to
be materialized for an expression to work. The
next step is to migrate all materialization code
from ClangExpressionDeclMap to Materializer, and
to use it for variable materialization.
llvm-svn: 179245
Add support for the COFF relocation types IMAGE_REL_I386_DIR32NB and
IMAGE_REL_AMD64_ADDR32NB for 32- and 64-bit respectively. These are
similar to normal 4-byte relocations except that they do not include
the base address of the image.
Image-relative relocations are used for debug information (32-bit) and
SEH unwind tables (64-bit).
A new MCSymbolRef variant called 'VK_COFF_IMGREL32' is introduced to
specify such relocations. For AT&T assembly, this variant can be accessed
using the symbol suffix '@imgrel'.
llvm-svn: 179240
Statements with an empty iteration domain may not have a schedule assigned by
the isl schedule optimizer. As Polly expects each statement to have a schedule,
we keep the old schedule for such statements.
This fixes http://llvm.org/PR15645`
Reported-by: Johannes Doerfert <johannesdoerfert@gmx.de>
llvm-svn: 179233
In the simple and triangle if-conversion cases, when CopyAndPredicateBlock is
used because the to-be-predicated block has other predecessors, we need to
explicitly remove the old copied block from the successors list. Normally if
conversion relies on TII->AnalyzeBranch combined with BB->CorrectExtraCFGEdges
to cleanup the successors list, but if the predicated block contained an
un-analyzable branch (such as a now-predicated return), then this will fail.
These extra successors were causing a problem on PPC because it was causing
later passes (such as PPCEarlyReturm) to leave dead return-only basic blocks in
the code.
llvm-svn: 179227
The heuristic here (proposed by Jordan) is that, usually, if a leak is due to an early exit from init, the allocation site will be
a call to alloc. Note that in other cases init resets self to [super init], which becomes the allocation site of the object.
llvm-svn: 179221
Compact unwind has an encoding for when we're not able to generate compact
unwind and must generate an EH frame instead. Track that, but still emit that CU
encoding.
llvm-svn: 179220
into the operand array of the start of the memory reference descriptor.
Additional code in EncodeInstruction provides an additional adjustment.
This patch places that additional code in a separate function,
called getOperandBias, so that any caller of getMemoryOperandNo
can also call getOperandBias.
llvm-svn: 179211
wasn't always the start of the operand. If there was a symbol reference, then
Start pointed to that token. It's very likely there are other places that need
to be updated.
llvm-svn: 179210
to disable following tests for Hexagon that require direct object
generation support.
DebugInfo/dwarf-public-names.ll
DebugInfo/dwarf-version.ll
DebugInfo/member-pointers.ll
DebugInfo/namespace.ll
DebugInfo/two-cus-from-same-file.ll
Fixes bug 15616 - http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15616
llvm-svn: 179209
I've not seen this happen in practice, and probably can't until we start
allowing decrement-counter-based conditional branches to be double predicated,
but just in case, don't allow predication of a diamond in which both sides have
ctr-defining branches. Even though the branching behavior of these can be
predicated, the counter-decrementing behavior cannot be.
llvm-svn: 179199
Test cases that regressed due to r179115, plus a few more, were added in
r179182. Original commit message below:
[ms-inline asm] Use parsePrimaryExpr in lieu of parseExpression if we need to
parse an identifier. Otherwise, parseExpression may parse multiple tokens,
which makes it impossible to properly compute an immediate displacement.
An example of such a case is the source operand (i.e., [Symbol + ImmDisp]) in
the below example:
__asm mov eax, [Symbol + ImmDisp]
Part of rdar://13611297
llvm-svn: 179187
Mips32 code as Mips16 unless it can't be compiled as Mips 16. For now this
would happen as long as floating point instructions are not needed.
Probably it would also make sense to compile as mips32 if atomic operations
are needed too. There may be other cases too.
A module pass prescans the IR and adds the mips16 or nomips16 attribute
to functions depending on the functions needs.
Mips 16 mode can result in a 40% code compression by utililizing 16 bit
encoding of many instructions.
The hope is for this to replace the traditional gcc way of dealing with
Mips16 code using floating point which involves essentially using soft float
but with a library implemented using mips32 floating point. This gcc
method also requires creating stubs so that Mips32 code can interact with
these Mips 16 functions that have floating point needs. My conjecture is
that in reality this traditional gcc method would never win over this
new method.
I will be implementing the traditional gcc method also. Some of it is already
done but I needed to do the stubs to finish the work and those required
this mips16/32 mixed mode capability.
I have more ideas for to make this new method much better and I think the old
method will just live in llvm for anyone that needs the backward compatibility
but I don't for what reason that would be needed.
llvm-svn: 179185
Daniel Dunbar