As far as I can tell this should be handled by foldCastedBitwiseLogic which is called later in visitXor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36214
llvm-svn: 309882
This adds support for sext in foldLogicCastConstant. This is a prerequisite for D36214.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36234
llvm-svn: 309880
Followup to r309570, fixing it slightly differently (ranges_base and
addr_base should never be read from a DWO file - so there shouldn't be
any issue with 'overriding' the values - conditionalize the code and
assert that the values aren't being overriden).
llvm-svn: 309879
Power 9 has instructions to do absolute difference (VABSDUB, VABSDUH, VABSDUW)
for byte, halfword and word. We should take advantage of these.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34684
llvm-svn: 309876
Summary:
This patch makes LoopDeletion use the incremental DominatorTree API.
We modify LoopDeletion to perform the deletion in 5 steps:
1. Create a new dummy edge from the preheader to the exit, by adding a conditional branch.
2. Inform the DomTree about the new edge.
3. Remove the conditional branch and replace it with an unconditional edge to the exit. This removes the edge to the loop header, making it unreachable.
4. Inform the DomTree about the deleted edge.
5. Remove the unreachable block from the function.
Creating the dummy conditional branch is necessary to perform incremental DomTree update.
We should consider using the batch updater when it's ready.
Reviewers: dberlin, davide, grosser, sanjoy
Reviewed By: dberlin, grosser
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35391
llvm-svn: 309850
This patch is update after the first patch (https://reviews.llvm.org/rL309651) based on the post-commit comments.
Stack coloring pass need to maintain AliasAnalysis information when merging stack slots of different types.
Actually, there is a FIXME comment in StackColoring.cpp
// FIXME: In order to enable the use of TBAA when using AA in CodeGen,
// we'll also need to update the TBAA nodes in MMOs with values
// derived from the merged allocas.
But, TBAA has been already enabled in CodeGen without fixing this pass.
The incorrect TBAA metadata results in recent failures in bootstrap test on ppc64le (PR33928) by allowing unsafe instruction scheduling.
Although we observed the problem on ppc64le, this is a platform neutral issue.
This patch makes the stack coloring pass maintains AliasAnalysis information when merging multiple stack slots.
This patch fixes PR33928.
llvm-svn: 309849
GAS ignores the aforementioned issue
this patch aligns LLVM + throws in an appropriate warning
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36060
llvm-svn: 309841
Summary:
Adding a new restructuredText file to document the trace format produced with
an FDR mode handler and read by llvm-xray toolset.
Reviewers: dberris, pelikan
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36041
llvm-svn: 309836
If there are no calls, this is a faster path than
searching the entire program for calls.
This was supposed to be left in r309781.
Fixes unused variable warning.
llvm-svn: 309832
During store merge we construct a sorted list of consecutive store
candidates and consider subsequences for merging into a single
store. For each subsequence we check if the stored value type is legal
the merged store would have valid and fast and if the constructed
value to be stored is valid. The only properties that affect this
check between subsequences is the size of the subsequence, the
alignment of the first store, the alignment of the stored load value
(when merging stores-of-loads), and whether the merged value is a
constant zero.
If we do not find a viable mergeable subsequence starting from the
first store of length N, we know that a subsequence starting at a
later store of length N will also fail unless the new store's
alignment, the new load's alignment (if we're merging store-of-loads),
or we've dropped stores of nonzero value and could construct a merged
stores of zero (for merging constants).
As a result if we fail to find a valid subsequence starting from the
first store we can safely skip considering subsequences that start
with subsequent stores unless one of the above properties is
true. This significantly (2x) improves compile time in some
pathological cases.
Reviewers: RKSimon, efriedma, zvi, spatel, waltl
Subscribers: grandinj, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35901
llvm-svn: 309830
Summary:
Currently most of the time vectors of extractelement instructions are
treated as scalars that must be gathered into vectors. But in some
cases, like when we have extractelement instructions from single vector
with different constant indeces or from 2 vectors of the same size, we
can treat this operations as shuffle of a single vector or blending of 2
vectors.
```
define <2 x i8> @g(<2 x i8> %x, <2 x i8> %y) {
%x0 = extractelement <2 x i8> %x, i32 0
%y1 = extractelement <2 x i8> %y, i32 1
%x0x0 = mul i8 %x0, %x0
%y1y1 = mul i8 %y1, %y1
%ins1 = insertelement <2 x i8> undef, i8 %x0x0, i32 0
%ins2 = insertelement <2 x i8> %ins1, i8 %y1y1, i32 1
ret <2 x i8> %ins2
}
```
can be converted to something like
```
define <2 x i8> @g(<2 x i8> %x, <2 x i8> %y) {
%1 = shufflevector <2 x i8> %x, <2 x i8> %y, <2 x i32> <i32 0, i32 3>
%2 = mul <2 x i8> %1, %1
ret <2 x i8> %2
}
```
Currently this type of conversion is considered as high cost
transformation.
Reviewers: mzolotukhin, delena, mkuper, hfinkel, RKSimon
Subscribers: ashahid, RKSimon, spatel, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30200
llvm-svn: 309812
This should enable us to test the generation of target-specific constant
pools, e.g. for ARM:
constants:
- id: 0
value: 'g(GOT_PREL)-(LPC0+8-.)'
alignment: 4
isTargetSpecific: true
I intend to use this to test PIC support in GlobalISel for ARM.
This is difficult to test outside of that context, since the existing
MIR tests usually rely on parser support as well, and that seems a bit
trickier to add. We could try to add a unit test, but the setup for that
seems rather convoluted and overkill.
We do test however that the parser reports a nice error when
encountering a target-specific constant pool.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36092
llvm-svn: 309806
infinite-inlining across multiple runs of the inliner by keeping a tiny
history of internal-to-SCC inlining decisions.
This is still a bit gross, but I don't yet have any fundamentally better
ideas and numerous people are blocked on this to use new PM and ThinLTO
together.
The core of the idea is to detect when we are about to do an inline that
has a chance of re-splitting an SCC which we have split before with
a similar inlining step. That is a critical component in the inlining
forming a cycle and so far detects all of the various cyclic patterns
I can come up with as well as the original real-world test case (which
comes from a ThinLTO build of libunwind).
I've added some tests that I think really demonstrate what is going on
here. They are essentially state machines that march the inliner through
various steps of a cycle and check that we stop when the cycle is closed
and that we actually did do inlining to form that cycle.
A lot of thanks go to Eric Christopher and Sanjoy Das for the help
understanding this issue and improving the test cases.
The biggest "yuck" here is the layering issue -- the CGSCC pass manager
is providing somewhat magical state to the inliner for it to use to make
itself converge. This isn't great, but I don't honestly have a lot of
better ideas yet and at least seems nicely isolated.
I have tested this patch, and it doesn't block *any* inlining on the
entire LLVM test suite and SPEC, so it seems sufficiently narrowly
targeted to the issue at hand.
We have come up with hypothetical issues that this patch doesn't cover,
but so far none of them are practical and we don't have a viable
solution yet that covers the hypothetical stuff, so proceeding here in
the interim. Definitely an area that we will be back and revisiting in
the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36188
llvm-svn: 309784
This was failing on out of bounds access to the extra operands
on the s_swappc_b64 beyond those in the instruction definition.
This was working, but somehow regressed within the past few weeks,
although I don't see any obvious commit.
llvm-svn: 309782
Summary: In ThinLTO backend compile, OPTOptions are not set so that the ICP in ThinLTO backend does not know if it is a SamplePGO build, in which profile count needs to be annotated directly on call instructions. This patch cleaned up the PGOOptions handling logic and passes down PGOOptions to ThinLTO backend.
Reviewers: chandlerc, tejohnson, davidxl
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36052
llvm-svn: 309780
Previous change "Turn s_and_saveexec_b64 into s_and_b64 if
result is unused" introduced asan use-after-poison error.
Instruction was analyzed after eraseFromParent() calls.
Move analysys higher than erase.
llvm-svn: 309779
This pattern shows up when lowering byval copies on AMDGPU.
The byval object access is split into 4-byte chunks, adding a
constant offset to the FixedStack base. When some of the offsets
turn into ors, this prevents combining the constant offsets.
This makes it not apparent that the object is there when matching
addressing modes, so it ends up using a scratch wave offset
relative access and the lengthy frame index expansion for that.
llvm-svn: 309775
instead of using the deprecated offset field of DBG_VALUE.
This has no observable effect on the generated DWARF, but the
assembler comments will look different.
rdar://problem/33580047
llvm-svn: 309773
With SI_END_CF elimination for some nested control flow we can now
eliminate saved exec register completely by turning a saveexec version
of instruction into just a logical instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36007
llvm-svn: 309766
Add a pass to remove redundant S_OR_B64 instructions enabling lanes in
the exec. If two SI_END_CF (lowered as S_OR_B64) come together without any
vector instructions between them we can only keep outer SI_END_CF, given
that CFG is structured and exec bits of the outer end statement are always
not less than exec bit of the inner one.
This needs to be done before the RA to eliminate saved exec bits registers
but after register coalescer to have no vector registers copies in between
of different end cf statements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35967
llvm-svn: 309762
If SCEV can prove that the backedge taken count for a loop is zero, it does not
need to "understand" a recursive PHI to compute its exiting value.
This should fix PR33885.
llvm-svn: 309758
In the last half-dozen commits to LLVM I removed code that became dead
after removing the offset parameter from llvm.dbg.value gradually
proceeding from IR towards the backend. Before I can move on to
DwarfDebug and friends there is one last side-called offset I need to
remove: This patch modifies PrologEpilogInserter's use of the
DBG_VALUE's offset argument to use a DIExpression instead. Because the
PrologEpilogInserter runs at the Machine level I had to play a little
trick with a named llvm.dbg.mir node to get the DIExpressions to print
in MIR dumps (which print the llvm::Module followed by the
MachineFunction dump).
I also had to add rudimentary DwarfExpression support to CodeView and
as a side-effect also fixed a bug (CodeViewDebug::collectVariableInfo
was supposed to give up on variables with complex DIExpressions, but
would fail to do so for fragments, which are also modeled as
DIExpressions).
With this last holdover removed we will have only one canonical way of
representing offsets to debug locations which will simplify the code
in DwarfDebug (and future versions of CodeViewDebug once it starts
handling more complex expressions) and make it easier to reason about.
This patch is NFC-ish: All test case changes are for assembler
comments and the binary output does not change.
rdar://problem/33580047
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36125
llvm-svn: 309751
The coverage tool needs to know which slice to look at when it's handed
a universal binary. Some projects need to look at aggregate coverage
reports for a variety of slices in different binaries: this patch adds
support for these kinds of projects to llvm-cov.
rdar://problem/33579007
llvm-svn: 309747
The previous attempt, which made do with a single offset in
computeCalleeSaveRegisterPairs, wasn't quite enough. The previous
attempt only worked as long as CombineSPBump == true (since the
offset would be adjusted later in fixupCalleeSaveRestoreStackOffset).
Instead include the size for the fixed stack area used for win64
varargs in calculations in emitPrologue/emitEpilogue. The stack
consists of mainly three parts;
- AFI->getLocalStackSize()
- AFI->getCalleeSavedStackSize()
- FixedObject
Most of the places in the code which previously used the CSStackSize
now use PrologueSaveSize instead, which is the sum of the latter
two, while some cases which need exactly the middle one use
AFI->getCalleeSavedStackSize() explicitly instead of a local variable.
In addition to moving the offsetting into emitPrologue/emitEpilogue
(which fixes functions with CombineSPBump == false), also set the
frame pointer to point to the right location, where the frame pointer
and link register actually are stored. In addition to the prologue/epilogue,
this also requires changes to resolveFrameIndexReference.
Add tests for a function that keeps a frame pointer and another one
that uses a VLA.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35919
llvm-svn: 309744
The src0 register must match src1 or src2, but if these
were undefined they could end up using different implicit_defed
virtual registers. Force these to use one undef vreg or pick the
defined other register.
Also fixes producing invalid nodes without the right number of
inputs when src2 is undef.
llvm-svn: 309743
Includes a hack to fix the type selected for
the GlobalAddress of the function, which will be
fixed by changing the default datalayout to use
generic pointers for 0.
llvm-svn: 309732
Summary:
We already have information about static alloca stack locations in our
side table. Emitting instructions for them is inefficient, and it only
happens when the address of the alloca has been materialized within the
current block, which isn't often.
Reviewers: aprantl, probinson, dblaikie
Subscribers: jfb, dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, llvm-commits, aheejin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36117
llvm-svn: 309729
Craig Topper