This function attribute indicates that the function is not optimized
by any optimization or code generator passes with the
exception of interprocedural optimization passes.
llvm-svn: 189101
The bitcode representation attribute kinds are encoded into / decoded from
should be independent of the current set of LLVM attributes and their position
in the AttrKind enum. This patch explicitly encodes attributes to fixed bitcode
values.
With this patch applied, LLVM does not silently misread attributes written by
LLVM 3.3. We also enhance the decoding slightly such that an error message is
printed if an unknown AttrKind encoding was dected.
Bonus: Dropping bitcode attributes from AttrKind is now easy, as old AttrKinds
do not need to be kept to support the Bitcode reader.
llvm-svn: 187186
There was exactly one caller using this API right, the others were relying on
specific behavior of the default implementation. Since it's too hard to use it
right just remove it and standardize on the default behavior.
Defines away PR16132.
llvm-svn: 182636
Previously, BitstreamCursor read an abbreviated record by splatting the
whole thing into a data vector, then extracting and removing the /first/
element. Now, it reads the first element--the record code--separately from
the actual field values.
No (intended) functionality change.
llvm-svn: 181639
the things, and renames it to CBindingWrapping.h. I also moved
CBindingWrapping.h into Support/.
This new file just contains the macros for defining different wrap/unwrap
methods.
The calls to those macros, as well as any custom wrap/unwrap definitions
(like for array of Values for example), are put into corresponding C++
headers.
Doing this required some #include surgery, since some .cpp files relied
on the fact that including Wrap.h implicitly caused the inclusion of a
bunch of other things.
This also now means that the C++ headers will include their corresponding
C API headers; for example Value.h must include llvm-c/Core.h. I think
this is harmless, since the C API headers contain just external function
declarations and some C types, so I don't believe there should be any
nasty dependency issues here.
llvm-svn: 180881
The bitcode writer emits a reference to the attribute group that the object at
the given index refers to. The bitcode reader is modified to read this in and
map it back to the attribute group.
llvm-svn: 174952
I have some uncommitted changes to the cast code that catch this sort of thing
at compile-time but I still need to do some other cleanup before I can enable
it.
llvm-svn: 174853
This reads the attribute groups. It currently doesn't do anything with them.
NOTE: In the commit to the bitcode writer, the format *may* change in the near
future. Which means that this code would also change.
llvm-svn: 174849
This is some initial code for emitting the attribute groups into the bitcode.
NOTE: This format *may* change! Do not rely upon the attribute groups' bitcode
not changing.
llvm-svn: 174845
bitcode writer would generate abbrev records saying that the abbrev should be
filled with fixed zero-bit bitfields (this happens in the .bc writer when
the number of types used in a module is exactly one, since log2(1) == 0).
In this case, just handle it as a literal zero. We can't "just fix" the writer
without breaking compatibility with existing bc files, so have the abbrev reader
do the substitution.
Strengthen the assert in read to reject reads of zero bits so we catch such
crimes in the future, and remove the special case designed to handle this.
llvm-svn: 174801
Rename the PARAMATTR_CODE_ENTRY to PARAMATTR_CODE_ENTRY_OLD. It will be replaced
by another encoding. Keep around the current LLVM attribute encoder/decoder
code, but move it to the bitcode directories so that no one's tempted to use
them.
llvm-svn: 174335
We no longer accept an encoded integer as representing all of the
attributes. Convert this via the AttrBuilder class into an AttributeSet with the
correct representation (an AttributeSetImpl that holds a list of Attribute
objects).
llvm-svn: 173750
The 'getSlot' function and its ilk allow introspection into the AttributeSet
class. However, that class should be opaque. Allow access through accessor
methods instead.
llvm-svn: 173522
Previously we tried to infer it from the bit width size, with an added
IsIEEE argument for the PPC/IEEE 128-bit case, which had a default
value. This default value allowed bugs to creep in, where it was
inappropriate.
llvm-svn: 173138
BLOB (i.e., large, performance intensive data) in a bitcode file was switched to
invoking one virtual method call per byte read. Now we do one virtual call per
BLOB.
llvm-svn: 173065
through a BitstreamCursor that produce it: advance() and
advanceSkippingSubblocks(), representing the two most common ways clients
want to walk through bitcode.
llvm-svn: 172919
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
llvm-svn: 171366
missed in the first pass because the script didn't yet handle include
guards.
Note that the script is now able to handle all of these headers without
manual edits. =]
llvm-svn: 169224
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
Andrea Di Biagio