We had various variants of defining dump() functions in LLVM. Normalize
them (this should just consistently implement the things discussed in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2014-January/034323.html
For reference:
- Public headers should just declare the dump() method but not use
LLVM_DUMP_METHOD or #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
- The definition of a dump method should look like this:
#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
LLVM_DUMP_METHOD void MyClass::dump() {
// print stuff to dbgs()...
}
#endif
llvm-svn: 293359
This forces the code to call StringInit::get on the string early and
avoids storing duplicates in std::string and sometimes allows pointer
comparisons instead of string comparisons.
llvm-svn: 288642
This avoid an extra construction of a std::string (and a heap
allocation) when the caller only has a StringRef but no std::string at
hand.
llvm-svn: 288610
This is a mechanical change of comments in switches like fallthrough,
fall-through, or fall-thru to use the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro instead.
llvm-svn: 278902
Removed some unused headers, replaced some headers with forward class declarations.
Found using simple scripts like this one:
clear && ack --cpp -l '#include "llvm/ADT/IndexedMap.h"' | xargs grep -L 'IndexedMap[<]' | xargs grep -n --color=auto 'IndexedMap'
Patch by Eugene Kosov <claprix@yandex.ru>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19219
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266595
It would end up doing the concatenations from the second multiclass twice. This occured because SetValue detected a self assignment when trying to set the value of NAME to a VarInit called NAME. NAME is special here and it will get cleaned up later. So add a flag to suppress the self assignment check for this case.
Strangely the self-assignment error was returning false indicating it wasn't an error, but it wasn't doing the right thing. So this also changes it to report an error.
This fixes the names of some AVX512 FMA instructions that showed this double expansion.
llvm-svn: 256725
If the type isn't trivially moveable emplace can skip a potentially
expensive move. It also saves a couple of characters.
Call sites were found with the ASTMatcher + some semi-automated cleanup.
memberCallExpr(
argumentCountIs(1), callee(methodDecl(hasName("push_back"))),
on(hasType(recordDecl(has(namedDecl(hasName("emplace_back")))))),
hasArgument(0, bindTemporaryExpr(
hasType(recordDecl(hasNonTrivialDestructor())),
has(constructExpr()))),
unless(isInTemplateInstantiation()))
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 238602
We had not been trying hard enough to resolve def names inside multiclasses
that had complex concatenations, etc. Now we'll try harder.
Patch by Amaury Sechet!
llvm-svn: 237877
This patch was generated by a clang tidy checker that is being open sourced.
The documentation of that checker is the following:
/// The emptiness of a container should be checked using the empty method
/// instead of the size method. It is not guaranteed that size is a
/// constant-time function, and it is generally more efficient and also shows
/// clearer intent to use empty. Furthermore some containers may implement the
/// empty method but not implement the size method. Using empty whenever
/// possible makes it easier to switch to another container in the future.
Patch by Gábor Horváth!
llvm-svn: 226161
Ideally we would store the MultiClasses by value directly in the maps, but I had some trouble with that before and this at least fixes the leak.
llvm-svn: 223997
Upon further review I think the MultiClass is being copied into the map instead of being moved due to the copy constructor on the nested Record type. This ultimately got exposed when the vector in DefPrototype vector was changed to hold unique_ptrs in another commit. This caused gcc 4.7 to fail due to the use of the copy constructor on unique_ptr with the error pointing back to one of the insert calls from this commit. Not sure why clang was able to build.
This reverts commit 710cdf729f84b428bf41aa8d32dbdb35fff79fde.
llvm-svn: 222971
The previous patch had effect, but missed this one. It seems MSVC
gets ADL-confused by the calls where the first argument is a function call?
llvm-svn: 222968
It was failing with this kind of error:
C:\b\build\slave\CrWinClang\build\src\third_party\llvm\lib\TableGen\TGParser.cpp(1243) : error C2668: 'llvm::make_unique' : ambiguous call to overloaded function
C:\b\build\slave\CrWinClang\build\src\third_party\llvm\include\llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h(408): could be 'std::unique_ptr<llvm::Record,std::default_delete<_Ty>> llvm::make_unique<llvm::Record,std::string,llvm::SMLoc&,llvm::RecordKeeper&,bool>(std::string &&,llvm::SMLoc &,llvm::RecordKeeper &,bool &&)'
with
[
_Ty=llvm::Record
]
C:\b\depot_tools\win_toolchain\vs2013_files\win8sdk\bin\..\..\VC\include\memory(1637): or 'std::unique_ptr<llvm::Record,std::default_delete<_Ty>> std::make_unique<llvm::Record,std::string,llvm::SMLoc&,llvm::RecordKeeper&,bool>(std::string &&,llvm::SMLoc &,llvm::RecordKeeper &,bool &&)' [found using argument-dependent lookup]
with
[
_Ty=llvm::Record
]
while trying to match the argument list '(std::string, llvm::SMLoc, llvm::RecordKeeper, bool)'
llvm-svn: 222967
By class-instance values I mean 'Class<Arg>' in 'Class<Arg>.Field' or in
'Other<Class<Arg>>' (syntactically s SimpleValue). This is to differentiate
from unnamed/anonymous record definitions (syntactically an ObjectBody) which
are not affected by this change.
Consider the testcase:
class Struct<int i> {
int I = !shl(i, 1);
int J = !shl(I, 1);
}
class Class<Struct s> {
int Class_J = s.J;
}
multiclass MultiClass<int i> {
def Def : Class<Struct<i>>;
}
defm Defm : MultiClass<2>;
Before this fix, DefmDef.Class_J yields !shl(I, 1) instead of 8.
This is the sequence of events. We start with this:
multiclass MultiClass<int i> {
def Def : Class<Struct<i>>;
}
During ParseDef the anonymous object for the class-instance value is created:
multiclass Multiclass<int i> {
def anonymous_0 : Struct<i>;
def Def : Class<NAME#anonymous_0>;
}
Then class Struct<i> is added to anonymous_0. Also Class<NAME#anonymous_0> is
added to Def:
multiclass Multiclass<int i> {
def anonymous_0 {
int I = !shl(i, 1);
int J = !shl(I, 1);
}
def Def {
int Class_J = NAME#anonymous_0.J;
}
}
So far so good but then we move on to instantiating this in the defm
by substituting the template arg 'i'.
This is how the anonymous prototype looks after fully instantiating.
defm Defm = {
def Defmanonymous_0 {
int I = 4;
int J = !shl(I, 1);
}
Note that we only resolved the reference to the template arg. The
non-template-arg reference in 'J' has not been resolved yet.
Then we go on to instantiating the Def prototype:
def DefmDef {
int Class_J = NAME#anonymous_0.J;
}
Which is resolved to Defmanonymous_0.J and then to !shl(I, 1).
When we fully resolve each record in a defm, Defmanonymous_0.J does get set
to 8 but that's too late for its use.
The patch adds a new attribute to the Record class that indicates that this
def is actually a class-instance value that may be *used* by other defs in a
multiclass. (This is unlike regular defs which don't reference each other and
thus can be resolved indepedently.) They are then fully resolved before the
other defs while the multiclass is instantiated.
I added vg_leak to the new test. I am not sure if this is necessary but I
don't think I have a way to test it. I can also check in without the XFAIL
and let the bots test this part.
Also tested that X86.td.expanded and AAarch64.td.expanded were unchange before
and after this change. (This issue triggering this problem is a WIP patch.)
Part of <rdar://problem/17688758>
llvm-svn: 217886
Matthias Braun