copy-initialization. We previously got this wrong in a couple of ways:
- we only looked for copy / move constructors and constructor templates for
this copy, and thus would fail to copy in cases where doing so should use
some other constructor (but see core issue 670),
- we mishandled the special case for disabling user-defined conversions that
blocks infinite recursion through repeated application of a copy constructor
(applying it in slightly too many cases) -- though as far as I can tell,
this does not ever actually affect the result of overload resolution, and
- we misapplied the special-case rules for constructors taking a parameter
whose type is a (reference to) the same class type by incorrectly assuming
that only happens for copy/move constructors (it also happens for
constructors instantiated from templates and those inherited from base
classes).
These changes should only affect strange corner cases (for instance, where the
copy constructor exists but has a non-const-qualified parameter type), so for
the most part it only causes us to produce more 'candidate' notes, but see the
test changes for other cases whose behavior is affected.
llvm-svn: 280776
The reasoning is that this construct is accepted by all compilers and valid in
C++11, so it doesn't seem like a useful warning to have enabled by default.
Building with -pedantic, -Wbind-to-temporary-copy, or -Wc++98-compat still
shows the warning.
The motivation is that I built re2, and this was the only warning that was
emitted during the build. Both changing re2 to fix the warning and detecting
clang and suppressing the warning in re2's build seem inferior than just giving
the compiler a good default for this warning.
Also move the cxx98compat version of this warning to CXX98CompatPedantic, and
update tests accordingly.
llvm-svn: 218008
to disable the corresponding -Wc++98-compat warnings in addition to the C++11
extension warnings, so that people already using these flags can switch to C++11
mode and turn on -Wc++98-compat.
llvm-svn: 144404
Richard Smith