things going on here that were problematic:
- We were missing the actual access check, or rather, it was suppressed
on account of being a redeclaration lookup.
- The access check would naturally happen during delay, which isn't
appropriate in this case.
- We weren't actually emitting dependent diagnostics associated with
class templates, which was unfortunate.
- Access was being propagated incorrectly for friend method declarations
that couldn't be matched at parse-time.
llvm-svn: 161652
and a function template instantiation, if there's a parameter pack in the
declaration and one at the same place in the instantiation, don't assume that
the pack wasn't expanded -- it may have expanded to nothing. Instead, go ahead
and check whether the parameter pack was expandable. We can do this as a
side-effect of the work we'd need to do anyway, to find how many parameters
were produced.
llvm-svn: 160416
exception specifications on member functions until after the closing
'}' for the containing class. This allows, for example, a member
function to throw an instance of its own class. Fixes PR12564 and a
fairly embarassing oversight in our C++98/03 support.
llvm-svn: 154844
instead of having a special-purpose function.
- ActOnCXXDirectInitializer, which was mostly duplication of
AddInitializerToDecl (leading e.g. to PR10620, which Eli fixed a few days
ago), is dropped completely.
- MultiInitializer, which was an ugly hack I added, is dropped again.
- We now have the infrastructure in place to distinguish between
int x = {1};
int x({1});
int x{1};
-- VarDecl now has getInitStyle(), which indicates which of the above was used.
-- CXXConstructExpr now has a flag to indicate that it represents list-
initialization, although this is not yet used.
- InstantiateInitializer was renamed to SubstInitializer and simplified.
- ActOnParenOrParenListExpr has been replaced by ActOnParenListExpr, which
always produces a ParenListExpr. Placed that so far failed to convert that
back to a ParenExpr containing comma operators have been fixed. I'm pretty
sure I could have made a crashing test case before this.
The end result is a (I hope) considerably cleaner design of initializers.
More importantly, the fact that I can now distinguish between the various
initialization kinds means that I can get the tricky generalized initializer
test cases Johannes Schaub supplied to work. (This is not yet done.)
This commit passed self-host, with the resulting compiler passing the tests. I
hope it doesn't break more complicated code. It's a pretty big change, but one
that I feel is necessary.
llvm-svn: 150318
template without a corresponding parameter pack, don't immediately
substitute the alias template. This is under discussion in the C++
committee, and may become ill-formed, but for now we match GCC.
llvm-svn: 149697
template. Such pack expansions can easily fail at template
instantiation time, if the expanded parameter packs are of the wrong
length. Fixes <rdar://problem/10040867>, PR9021, and the example that
came up today at Going Native.
llvm-svn: 149685
part of template argument deduction is ill-formed, we mark it as
invalid and treat it as a deduction failure. If we happen to find that
specialization again, treat it as a deduction failure rather than
silently building a call to the declaration.
Fixes PR11117, a marvelous bug where deduction failed after creating
an invalid specialization, causing overload resolution to pick a
different candidate. Then we performed a similar overload resolution
later, and happily picked the invalid specialization to
call... resulting in a silent link failure.
llvm-svn: 141809
This makes the code duplication of implicit special member handling even worse,
but the cleanup will have to come later. For now, this works.
Follow-up with tests for explicit defaulting and enabling the __has_feature
flag to come.
llvm-svn: 138821
parameters on the floor in certain cases:
class X {
template <typename T> friend typename A<T>::Foo;
};
This was parsed as a *non* template friend declaration some how, and
received an ExtWarn. Fixing the parser to actually provide the template
parameters to the freestanding declaration parse triggers the code which
specifically looks for such constructs and hard errors on them.
Along the way, this prevents us from trying to instantiate constructs
like the above inside of a outer template. This is important as loosing
the template parameters means we don't have a well formed declaration
and template instantiation will be unable to rebuild the AST. That fixes
a crash in the GCC test suite.
llvm-svn: 130772
of an expansion, and we have a paramameter that is not a parameter
pack, don't suppress substitution of parameter packs within this
context.
llvm-svn: 126819
parameter type to see what's behind it, so that we don't end up
printing silly things like "float const *" when "const float *" would
make more sense. Also, replace the pile of "isa" tests with a simple
switch enumerating all of the cases, making a few more obvious cases
use prefix qualifiers.
llvm-svn: 125729
together. In particular:
- Handle the use of captured parameter pack names within blocks
(BlockDeclRefExpr understands parameter packs now)
- Handle the declaration and expansion of parameter packs within a block's
parameter list, e.g., ^(Args ...args) { ... })
- Handle instantiation of blocks where the return type was not
explicitly specified. (unrelated, but necessary for my tests).
Together, these fixes should make blocks and variadic templates work
reasonably well together. Note that BlockDeclRefExpr is still broken
w.r.t. its computation of type and value dependence, which will still
cause problems for blocks in templates.
llvm-svn: 123849
a pack expansion, e.g., the parameter pack Values in:
template<typename ...Types>
struct Outer {
template<Types ...Values>
struct Inner;
};
This new implementation approach introduces the notion of an
"expanded" non-type template parameter pack, for which we have already
expanded the types of the parameter pack (to, say, "int*, float*",
for Outer<int*, float*>) but have not yet expanded the values. Aside
from creating these expanded non-type template parameter packs, this
patch updates template argument checking and non-type template
parameter pack instantiation to make use of the appropriate types in
the parameter pack.
llvm-svn: 123845
non-variadic function template over a variadic one. This matches GCC
and the intent of the C++0x wording, in a way that I think is likely
to be acceptable to the committee.
llvm-svn: 123581
template template parameter pack that cannot be fully expanded because
its enclosing pack expansion could not be expanded. This form of
TemplateName plays the same role as SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType and
SubstNonTypeTemplateParmPackExpr do for template type parameter packs
and non-type template parameter packs, respectively.
We should now handle these multi-level pack expansion substitutions
anywhere. The largest remaining gap in our variadic-templates support
is that we cannot cope with non-type template parameter packs whose
type is a pack expansion.
llvm-svn: 123521
that captures the substitution of a non-type template argument pack
for a non-type template parameter pack within a pack expansion that
cannot be fully expanded. This follows the approach taken by
SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType.
llvm-svn: 123506
expansion in it, we may end up instantiating to an empty
expression-list. In this case, the variable is uninitialized; tweak
the instantiation logic to handle this case. Fixes PR8977.
llvm-svn: 123449
expansion, when it is known due to the substitution of an out
parameter pack. This allows us to properly handle substitution into
pack expansions that involve multiple parameter packs at different
template parameter levels, even when this substitution happens one
level at a time (as with partial specializations of member class
templates and the signatures of member function templates).
Note that the diagnostic we provide when there is an arity mismatch
between an outer parameter pack and an inner parameter pack in this
case isn't as clear as the normal diagnostic for an arity
mismatch. However, this doesn't matter because these cases are very,
very rare and (even then) only typically occur in a SFINAE context.
The other kinds of pack expansions (expression, template, etc.) still
need to support optional tracking of the number of expansions, and we
need the moral equivalent of SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType for
substituted argument packs of template template and non-type template
parameters.
llvm-svn: 123448
involve template parameter packs at multiple template levels that
occur within the signatures members of class templates (and partial
specializations thereof). This is a work-in-progress that is deficient
in several ways, notably:
- It only works for template type parameter packs, but we need to
also support non-type template parameter packs and template template
parameter packs.
- It doesn't keep track of the lengths of the substituted argument
packs in the expansion, so it can't properly diagnose length
mismatches.
However, this is a concrete step in the right direction.
llvm-svn: 123425
when we're actually matching a template template argument to a
template template parameter. Otherwise, use strict matching.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8859985> clang++: variadics and out-of-line definitions.
llvm-svn: 123385
matching of variadic template template parameters to template
arguments. This paragraph was the subject of ISO C++ committee
document N2555: Extending Variadic Template Template Parameters.
llvm-svn: 123348
another pack expansion type. This can happen when rebuilding types in
the current instantiation.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8848837> (Clang crashing on libc++ <functional>).
llvm-svn: 123316
and function templates that contain variadic templates. This involves
three small-ish changes:
(1) When transforming a pack expansion, if the transformed argument
still contains unexpanded parameter packs, build a pack
expansion. This can happen during the substitution that occurs into
class template partial specialiation template arguments during
partial ordering.
(2) When performing template argument deduction where the argument
is a pack expansion, match against the pattern of that pack
expansion.
(3) When performing template argument deduction against a non-pack
parameter, or a non-expansion template argument, deduction fails if
the argument itself is a pack expansion (C++0x
[temp.deduct.type]p22).
llvm-svn: 123279
expression kinds. This is (indirectly) a test verifying that the
recursive AST visitor is visiting the children of these expression
nodes.
llvm-svn: 123198
allows an argument pack determines via explicit specification of
function template arguments to be extended by further, deduced
arguments. For example:
template<class ... Types> void f(Types ... values);
void g() {
f<int*, float*>(0, 0, 0); // Types is deduced to the sequence int*, float*, int
}
There are a number of FIXMEs in here that indicate places where we
need to implement + test retained expansions, plus a number of other
places in deduction where we need to correctly cope with the
explicitly-specified arguments when deducing an argument
pack. Furthermore, it appears that the RecursiveASTVisitor needs to be
auditied; it's missing some traversals (especially w.r.t. template
arguments) that cause it not to find unexpanded parameter packs when
it should.
The good news, however, is that the tr1::tuple implementation now
works fully, and the tr1::bind example (both from N2080) is actually
working now.
llvm-svn: 123163
tuple class template. This implementation is boosted directly from the
variadic templates proposal. N2080.
Note that one section is #ifdef'd out. I'll implement that aspect of
template argument deduction next.
llvm-svn: 123016
1) Declaration of function parameter packs
2) Instantiation of function parameter packs within function types.
3) Template argument deduction of function parameter packs when
matching two function types.
We're missing all of the important template-instantiation logic for
function template definitions, along with template argument deduction
from the argument list of a function call, so don't even think of
trying to use these for real yet.
llvm-svn: 122926
expansions with something that is easier to use correctly: a new
template argment kind, rather than a bit on an existing kind. Update
all of the switch statements that deal with template arguments, fixing
a few latent bugs in the process. I"m happy with this representation,
now.
And, oh look! Template instantiation and deduction work for template
template argument pack expansions.
llvm-svn: 122896
specializations. We weren't dealing with any of the cases where the
type of the non-type template argument differs from the type of the
corresponding template parameter in the primary template. We would
think that the template parameter in the partial specialization was
not deducible (and warn about it, incorrectly), then fail to convert a
deduced parameter to the type of the template parameter in the partial
specialization (which may involve truncation, among other
things). Fixes PR8905.
llvm-svn: 122851
template argument (described by an expression, of course). For
example:
template<int...> struct int_tuple { };
template<int ...Values>
struct square {
typedef int_tuple<(Values*Values)...> type;
};
It also lays the foundation for pack expansions in an initializer-list.
llvm-svn: 122751
extract the appropriate argument from the argument pack (based on the
current substitution index, of course). Simple instantiation of pack
expansions involving non-type template parameter packs now works.
llvm-svn: 122532
packs, e.g.,
template<typename T, unsigned ...Dims> struct multi_array;
along with semantic analysis support for finding unexpanded non-type
template parameter packs in types, expressions, and so on.
Template instantiation involving non-type template parameter packs
probably doesn't work yet. That'll come soon.
llvm-svn: 122527
specialization's template arguments against the primary template's
template arguments using the obvious, correct method of checking the
injected-class-name type (C++ [temp.class.spec]p9b3). The previous
incarnation of this comparison attempted to use its own formulation of
the injected-class-name, which is redudant and, with the introduction
of variadic templates, became wrong (again).
llvm-svn: 122508
template argument corresponding to a template parameter pack is an
argument pack of a pack expansion of that template parameter
pack. Implements C++0x [temp.dep.type]p2 (at least, as much of it as
we can).
llvm-svn: 122498
pattern is a template argument, which involves repeatedly deducing
template arguments using the pattern of the pack expansion, then
bundling the resulting deductions into an argument pack.
We can now handle a variety of simple list-handling metaprograms using
variadic templates. See, e.g., the new "count" metaprogram.
llvm-svn: 122439
dependent template specialization type, the number of template
arguments need not match precisely. Rather than checking the number of
arguments eagerly (which does not consider argument packs), let the
deduction routine for template argument lists cope with too many/too
few arguments.
llvm-svn: 122425
deduction. Unify all of the looping over template arguments for
deduction purposes into a single place, where argument pack expansion
occurs; this is also the hook for deducing from pack expansions, which
itself is not yet implemented.
For now, at least we can handle a basic "count" metafunction written
with variadics. See the new test for the formulation that works.
llvm-svn: 122418
whose patterns are template arguments. We can now instantiate, e.g.,
typedef tuple<pair<OuterTypes, InnerTypes>...> type;
where OuterTypes and InnerTypes are template type parameter packs.
There is a horrible inefficiency in
TemplateArgumentLoc::getPackExpansionPattern(), where we need to
create copies of TypeLoc data because our interfaces traffic in
TypeSourceInfo pointers where they should traffic in TypeLocs
instead. I've isolated in efficiency in this one routine; once we
refactor our interfaces to traffic in TypeLocs, we can eliminate it.
llvm-svn: 122278
a parameter pack, check the parameter pack against each of the
template arguments it corresponds to, then pack the converted
arguments into a template argument pack. Allows us to use variadic
class templates so long as instantiation isn't required, e.g.,
template<typename... Types> struct Tuple;
Tuple<int, float> *t2;
llvm-svn: 122251
pack expansions, e.g. given
template<typename... Types> struct tuple;
template<typename... Types>
struct tuple_of_refs {
typedef tuple<Types&...> types;
};
the type of the "types" typedef is a PackExpansionType whose pattern
is Types&.
This commit introduces support for creating pack expansions for
template type arguments, as above, but not for any other kind of pack
expansion, nor for any form of instantiation.
llvm-svn: 122223
declarations. This is a work in progress, as I go through the C++
declaration grammar to identify where unexpanded parameter packs can
occur.
llvm-svn: 121912
parameter packs within a statement, type, etc. Use this visitor to
provide improved diagnostics for the presence of unexpanded parameter
packs in a full expression, base type, declaration type, etc., by
highlighting the unexpanded parameter packs and providing their names,
e.g.,
test/CXX/temp/temp.decls/temp.variadic/p5.cpp:28:85: error: declaration type
contains unexpanded parameter packs 'VeryInnerTypes',
'OuterTypes', ...
...VeryInnerTypes, OuterTypes>, pair<InnerTypes, OuterTypes> > types;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
llvm-svn: 121883
whether the expression contains an unexpanded parameter pack, in the
same vein as the changes to the Type hierarchy. Compute this bit
within all of the Expr subclasses.
This change required a bunch of reshuffling of dependency
calculations, mainly to consolidate them inside the constructors and
to fuse multiple loops that iterate over arguments to determine type
dependence, value dependence, and (now) containment of unexpanded
parameter packs.
Again, testing is painfully sparse, because all of the diagnostics
will change and it is more important to test the to-be-written visitor
that collects unexpanded parameter packs.
llvm-svn: 121831
and TemplateArgument with an operation that determines whether there
are any unexpanded parameter packs within that construct. Use this
information to diagnose the appearance of the names of parameter packs
that have not been expanded (C++ [temp.variadic]p5). Since this
property is checked often (every declaration, ever expression
statement, etc.), we extend Type and Expr with a bit storing the
result of this computation, rather than walking the AST each time to
determine whether any unexpanded parameter packs occur.
This commit is deficient in several ways, which will be remedied with
future commits:
- Expr has a bit to store the presence of an unexpanded parameter
pack, but it is never set.
- The error messages don't point out where the unexpanded parameter
packs were named in the type/expression, but they should.
- We don't check for unexpanded parameter packs in all of the places
where we should.
- Testing is sparse, pending the resolution of the above three
issues.
llvm-svn: 121724
particular, we only add the implement object parameter type if only
one of the function templates is a non-static member function
template.
Moreover, since this DR differs from existing practice in C++98/03,
this commit implements the existing practice (which ignores the
first parameter of the function template that is not the non-static
member function template) in C++98/03 mode.
llvm-svn: 119145
in the order they occur within the class template, delaying
out-of-line member template partial specializations until after the
class has been fully instantiated. This fixes a regression introduced
by r118454 (itself a fix for PR8001).
llvm-svn: 118704
John McCall