Summary:
The renaming is necessary to make the naming scheme uniform with other
gather/scatter load/stores SVE intrinsics.
The naming of variables and functions have been adapted to make it
explicit whether we are dealing with a scalar offset (which is
unscaled) or an index (which is scaled according to the data type of
the lanes of the vector).
Reviewers: andwar, sdesmalen, rengolin
Reviewed By: andwar
Subscribers: tschuett, hiraditya, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77839
The "Align" passed into getMachineMemOperand etc. is the alignment of
the MachinePointerInfo, not the alignment of the memory operation.
(getAlign() on a MachineMemOperand automatically reduces the alignment
to account for this.)
We were passing on wrong (overconservative) alignment in a bunch of
places. Fix a bunch of these, mostly in legalization. And while I'm
here, switch to the new Align APIs.
The test changes are all scheduling changes: the biggest effect of
preserving large alignments is that it improves alias analysis, so the
scheduler has more freedom.
(I was originally just trying to do a minor cleanup in
SelectionDAGBuilder, but I accidentally went deeper down the rabbit
hole.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77687
This moves v32i16/v64i8 to a model consistent with how we
treat integer types with avx1.
This does change the ABI for types vXi16/vXi8 vectors larger than
512 bits to pass in multiple zmms instead of multiple ymms. We'd
already hacked some code to make v64i8/v32i16 pass in zmm.
Cost model is still a bit of a mess. In some place I tried to
match existing behavior. But really we need to account for
splitting and concating costs. Cost model for shuffles is
especially pessimistic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76212
We generally only combine starting from users to defs in the artifact combiner,
but this doesn't catch cases where at the point of combining a G_UNMERGE we don't
yet have the opposite G_MERGE on input yet since we haven't legalized that far.
This change adds the users of a G_MERGE to the artifact combiner worklist if one
of the uses is a G_UNMERGE or G_TRUNC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77931
Summary:
The combine for unmerge(cast(merge)) is only valid for vectors, but was
missing a corresponding check. Add a check that the operands are vectors
to avoid an invalid combine.
Without this check, the combiner would emit incorrect code for scalars
and pointers because the artifact cast (trunc/ext) only affects bits at
the end of the type, while this combine assumes that the casted bits
appear between meaningful bits.
This also uncovered a segmentation fault in the AMDGPU
InstructionSelector. The tests triggering this bug have been moved to
their own file and a check for the segmentation fault has been added.
Reviewers: arsenm, dsanders, aemerson, paquette, aditya_nandakumar
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: tpr, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78191
Summary:
As a follow up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D29014, add translation
support for freeze.
Introduce a new generic instruction G_FREEZE and translate freeze to it.
Reviewers: dsanders, aqjune, arsenm, aditya_nandakumar, t.p.northover, lebedev.ri, paquette, aemerson
Reviewed By: aqjune, arsenm
Subscribers: fhahn, lebedev.ri, wdng, rovka, hiraditya, jfb, volkan, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77795
This patch intends to provide relocation support for the expression
contains two unpaired relocatable terms with opposite signs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77424
Summary:
No error or warning is emitted when specific reserved registers are
written to in inline assembly. Therefore, writes to the program counter
or to the frame pointer, for instance, were permitted, which could have
led to undesirable behaviour.
Example:
int foo() {
register int a __asm__("r7"); // r7 = frame-pointer in M-class ARM
__asm__ __volatile__("mov %0, r1" : "=r"(a) : : );
return a;
}
In contrast, GCC issues an error in the same scenario.
This patch detects writes to specific reserved registers in inline
assembly for ARM and emits an error in such case. The detection works
for output and input operands. Clobber operands are not handled here:
they are already covered at a later point in
AsmPrinter::emitInlineAsm(const MachineInstr *MI). The registers
covered are: program counter, frame pointer and base pointer.
This is ARM only. Therefore the implementation of other targets'
counterparts remain open to do.
Reviewers: efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, danielkiss, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76848
Summary:
Changing all mnemonic to match assembly instructions to simplify mnemonic
naming rules. This time update all fixed-point arithmetic instructions.
This also corrects smax/smin code generations.
Reviewed By: simoll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77856
This was hitting the default instruction constraint code which uses
the register classes in the instruction def, which REG_SEQUENCE does
not have.
Fixes not constraining the register class for AMDGPU fneg/fabs
patterns, which would fail when the use was another generic,
unconstrained instruction.
Another oddity I noticed is that the temporary registers are created
with an unnecessary, but incorrect 16-bit LLT but this shouldn't
matter.
I'm also still unclear why root and sub-instructions have to be
handled differently.
Summary:
The test in question uses a non-portable `grep -A` option in conjunction
with `wc -l`. `FileCheck` can be used to do the check without using
these extra utilities.
Reviewed By: thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78060
Previously, getWithOffset() would drop the offset if the base was null.
Because of this, MachineMemOperand would return the wrong result from
getAlign() in these cases. MachineMemOperand stores the alignment of
the pointer without the offset.
A bunch of MIR tests changed because we print the offset now.
Split off from D77687.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78049
The pass was incorrectly reverting back to a "T" when something wrote
to VPR inside a "E" block. This is not the correct behaviour, the
predicate should stay the same.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77798
Summary:
Creates the SVEIntrinsicOpts pass. In this patch, the pass tries
to remove unnecessary reinterpret intrinsics which convert to
and from svbool_t (llvm.aarch64.sve.convert.[to|from].svbool)
For example, the reinterprets below are redundant:
%1 = call <vscale x 16 x i1> @llvm.aarch64.sve.convert.to.svbool.nxv4i1(<vscale x 4 x i1> %a)
%2 = call <vscale x 4 x i1> @llvm.aarch64.sve.convert.from.svbool.nxv4i1(<vscale x 16 x i1> %1)
The pass also looks for ptest intrinsics and phi instructions where
the operands are being needlessly converted to and from svbool_t.
Reviewers: sdesmalen, andwar, efriedma, cameron.mcinally, c-rhodes, rengolin
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: mgorny, tschuett, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, rkruppe, psnobl, danielkiss, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76078
Ports the existing DAG combines, minus the simplify demanded bits
which seems to have no equivalent now. Without these, this isn't
particularly helpful in most of the IR sample cases.
Summary:
In CFGStackify, `fixUnwindMismatches` function fixes unwind destination
mismatches created by `try` marker placement. For example,
```
try
...
call @qux ;; This should throw to the caller!
catch
...
end
```
When `call @qux` is supposed to throw to the caller, it is possible that
it is wrapped inside a `catch` so in case it throws it ends up unwinding
there incorrectly. (Also it is possible `call @qux` is supposed to
unwind to another `catch` within the same function.)
To fix this, we wrap this inner `call @qux` with a nested
`try`-`catch`-`end` sequence, and within the nested `catch` body, branch
to the right destination:
```
block $l0
try
...
try ;; new nested try
call @qux
catch ;; new nested catch
local.set n ;; store exnref to a local
br $l0
end
catch
...
end
end
local.get n ;; retrieve exnref back
rethrow ;; rethrow to the caller
```
The previous algorithm placed the nested `try` right before the `call`.
But it is possible that there are stackified instructions before the
call from which the call takes arguments.
```
try
...
i32.const 5
call @qux ;; This should throw to the caller!
catch
...
end
```
In this case we have to place `try` before those stackified
instructions.
```
block $l0
try
...
try ;; this should go *before* 'i32.const 5'
i32.const 5
call @qux
catch
local.set n
br $l0
end
catch
...
end
end
local.get n
rethrow
```
We correctly handle this in the first normal `try` placement phase
(`placeTryMarker` function), but failed to handle this in this
`fixUnwindMismatches`.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77950
This is equivalent in terms of LLVM IR semantics, but we want to
transition away from using MaybeAlign to represent the alignment of
these instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77984
in the same section.
This allows specifying BasicBlock clusters like the following example:
!foo
!!0 1 2
!!4
This places basic blocks 0, 1, and 2 in one section in this order, and
places basic block #4 in a single section of its own.
Since 1725f28841, this should check
isFMADLegalForFAddFSub rather than the the plain isOperationLegal.
This would assert in a subset of cases due to an oddity in how FMAD is
selected. We will allow FMA formation pre-legalize, but not FMAD even
in cases where it would be valid.
The current hook requires passing in the root fadd/fsub. However, in
this distributed case, this would be far more complicated to pass in
the relevant operand. AMDGPU doesn't get any value from the node, and
only needs the type and is the only implementor, so I'm not sure why
we have this complexity. Just rename and expand the assert to avoid
the more complicated checks spread through the distribution logic.
Summary:
Fold (shift (shift X, C2), C1) -> (shift X, (C1 + C2)) for logical as
well as arithmetic shifts. This is needed to prevent regressions from
an upcoming funnel shift expansion change.
While we're here, fold (VSRAI -1, C) -> -1 too.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77300
Improve the chances of folding the writemask into the combined shuffle by scaling a wider shuffle mask to match the root's original type.
This creates a few minor issues with variable shuffles, preventing combines of shuffles because of the more limited support binary shuffle types. In most cases we're probably better off combining the shuffles and losing the writemask fold, but this isn't always going to be true.
Now that's D77928 landed we need to try harder to match shuffle and mask widths. This is a couple of tests showing where variable shuffle masks have been widened preventing them from folding with the mask.
Sometimes LegalizeTypes knows about common subexpressions before SelectionDAG
does, leading to accidental SDValue removal before its reference count was
truly zero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76994
Reviewed-By: bjope
Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45049
Reverted in 3ce77142a6 because the previous patch
broke the expensive-checks bots. The new patch removes the broken check.
As discussed in PR36617:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36617#c13
...we can avoid the likely slow round-trip from XMM to GPR to XMM
by using the vector versions of the convert instructions.
Based on experimental results from recent Intel/AMD chips, we don't
need to worry about triggering denorm stalls while operating on
garbage data in the high lanes with convert instructions, so this is
expected to always be as good or better perf than the scalar
instruction equivalent. FP exceptions are also not a concern because
strict code should not be using the regular SDAG opcodes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77895
A lot of vectorized code doesn't use masks so we shouldn't penalize them by not doing shuffle combining on avx512 targets.
I've added support for VALIGNQ/VALIGND and 512-bit SHUF128 to prevent some regressions. I also prevented recombining 256-bit SHUF128 to PERM2X128. We may not need to add 256-bit SHUF128 support, but I don't think I found any cases requiring that in my testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77928
Summary: A count profile may affect tail duplication's heuristic causing a block to be duplicated in only a part of its predecessors. This is not allowed in the Machine Block Placement pass where an assert will go off. I'm removing the assert and making the optimization bail out when such case happens.
Reviewers: wenlei, davidxl, Carrot
Reviewed By: Carrot
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77748
Selection would fail after the post legalize combiner put an illegal
zextload back together.
The base combiner has parameter to only allow legal operations, but
they appear to not be used. I also don't see a nice way to remove a
single entry from all_combines, so just hack around this.
Stanislav Mekhanoshin