The code used llvm basic block predecessors to decided where to insert phi
nodes. Instruction selection can and will liberally insert new machine basic
block predecessors. There is not a guaranteed one-to-one mapping from pred.
llvm basic blocks and machine basic blocks.
Therefore the current approach does not work as it assumes we can mark
predecessor machine basic block as needing a copy, and needs to know the set of
all predecessor machine basic blocks to decide when to insert phis.
Instead of computing the swifterror vregs as we select instructions, propagate
them at the end of instruction selection when the MBB CFG is complete.
When an instruction needs a swifterror vreg and we don't know the value yet,
generate a new vreg and remember this "upward exposed" use, and reconcile this
at the end of instruction selection.
This will only happen if the target supports promoting swifterror parameters to
registers and the swifterror attribute is used.
rdar://28300923
llvm-svn: 283617
Summary:
Port rL265480, rL264754, rL265997 and rL266252 to SystemZ, in order to enable the Swift port on the architecture. SwiftSelf and SwiftError are assigned to R10 and R9, respectively, which are normally callee-saved registers. For more information, see:
RFC: Implementing the Swift calling convention in LLVM and Clang
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llvm-dev/epDd2w93kZ0
Reviewers: kbarton, manmanren, rjmccall, uweigand
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19414
llvm-svn: 267823
Arnold Schwaighofer