Of course, we really need to refactor and fix all of the cmp predicates,
but this one is interesting because without it, we later perform an
information-losing transform of icmp (shl 1, Y), C, and we can't recover
the better fold.
llvm-svn: 279263
In addition, the branch instructions will have proper BB destinations, not offsets, like before.
Patch by Vadzim Dambrouski!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20162
llvm-svn: 279242
Improved handling of fma, floating point min/max, additional load/store
instructions for floating point types.
Patch by Jyotsna Verma.
llvm-svn: 279239
solve completely opaque MSVC build errors. It complains about lots of
stuff with this change without givin nearly enough information to even
try to fix.
llvm-svn: 279231
INSERTPS doesn't fit well with our shuffle mask canonicalization, so we need to attempt both the original mask and the commuted mask to more likely get a match
llvm-svn: 279230
The new version has several advantages:
1) IMSHO it's more readable and neater
2) It handles loads and stores properly
3) It can handle any number of incoming blocks rather than just two. I'll be taking advantage of this in a followup patch.
With this change we can now finally sink load-modify-store idioms such as:
if (a)
return *b += 3;
else
return *b += 4;
=>
%z = load i32, i32* %y
%.sink = select i1 %a, i32 5, i32 7
%b = add i32 %z, %.sink
store i32 %b, i32* %y
ret i32 %b
When this works for switches it'll be even more powerful.
llvm-svn: 279229
to run methods, both for transform passes and analysis passes.
This also allows the analysis manager to use a different set of extra
arguments from the pass manager where useful. Consider passes over
analysis produced units of IR like SCCs of the call graph or loops.
Passes of this nature will often want to refer to the analysis result
that was used to compute their IR units (the call graph or LoopInfo).
And for transformations, they may want to communicate special update
information to the outer pass manager. With this change, it becomes
possible to have a run method for a loop pass that looks more like:
PreservedAnalyses run(Loop &L, AnalysisManager<Loop, LoopInfo> &AM,
LoopInfo &LI, LoopUpdateRecord &UR);
And to query the analysis manager like:
AM.getResult<MyLoopAnalysis>(L, LI);
This makes accessing the known-available analyses convenient and clear,
and it makes passing customized data structures around easy.
My initial use case is going to be in updating the pass manager layers
when the analysis units of IR change. But there are more use cases here
such as having a layer that lets inner passes signal whether certain
additional passes should be run because of particular simplifications
made. Two desires for this have come up in the past: triggering
additional optimization after successfully unrolling loops, and
triggering additional inlining after collapsing indirect calls to direct
calls.
Despite adding this layer of generic extensibility, the *only* change to
existing, simple usage are for places where we forward declare the
AnalysisManager template. We really shouldn't be doing this because of
the fragility exposed here, but currently it makes coping with the
legacy PM code easier.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21462
llvm-svn: 279227
r279217 where it fails to select the path that other compilers select.
The workaround won't be as careful to produce an error when an analysis
result is incorrect, but we can rely on non-MSVC builds to catch such
errors it seems and MSVC doesn't seem to support the alternative
techniques.
Hoping this brings the windows bots back to life. If not, will have to
revert all of this.
llvm-svn: 279225
The heuristic above this code is incredibly suspect, but disregarding that it mutates the cast opcode so we need to check the *mutated* opcode later to see if we need to emit an AssertSext or AssertZext node.
Fixes PR29041.
llvm-svn: 279223
into the AnalysisManager class template.
Back when I first added this base class there were separate analysis
managers and some plausible reason why it would be a useful factoring of
common code between them. However, after a lot of refactoring cleaning,
we now have *entirely* shared code. The base class was just an arbitrary
division between code in one class template and a separate class
template. It didn't add anything and forced lots of indirection through
"derived_this" for no real gain.
We can always factor a base CRTP class out with common code if there is
ever some *other* analysis manager that wants to share a subset of
logic. But for now, folding things into the primary template is
a non-trivial simplification with no down sides I see. It shortens the
code considerably, removes an unhelpful abstraction, and will make
subsequent patches *dramatically* less complex which enhance the
analysis manager infrastructure to effectively cope with invalidation.
llvm-svn: 279221
its own invalidate method.
Previously, the technique would assume that if a result didn't have an
invalidate method that didn't exactly match the expected signature it
didn't have one at all. This is in fact not the case. And we had
analyses with incorrect signatures for the invalidate method in the
tree that would be erroneously invalidated in certain cases! Yikes.
Moreover a result might legitimately want to have multiple overloads for
the invalidate method, and if one changes or a new one is needed we
again really want a compiler error. For example in the tree we had not
added the overload for a *function* IR unit to the invalidate routine
for TLI. Doh.
So a new techique for the SFINAE detection here: if the result has *any*
member spelled "invalidate" we turn off the synthesis of a default
version. We don't care if it is a member function or a member variable
or how many overloads there are. Once a result has something by that
name it must provide suitable overloads for the contexts in which it is
used. This seems much more resilient and durable.
Huge props to Richard Smith who helped me figure out how on earth we
could even do this in C++. It took quite some doing. The technique is
remarkably clean however, and merely requires that the analysis results
are not *final* classes. I think that's a requirement we can live with
even if it is a bit odd.
I've fixed the two bad in-tree analysis results. And this will make my
next change which changes the API for invalidate much easier to
validate as correct.
llvm-svn: 279217
directly produce the index as the value type result.
This requires making the index movable which is straightforward. It
greatly simplifies things by allowing us to completely avoid the builder
API and the layers of abstraction inherent there. Instead both pass
managers can directly construct these when run by value. They still
won't be constructed truly eagerly thanks to the optional in the legacy
PM. The code that directly builds the index can also just share a direct
function.
A notable change here is that the result type of the analysis for the
new PM is no longer a reference type. This was really problematic when
making changes to how we handle result types to make our interface
requirements *much* more strict and precise. But I think this is an
overall improvement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23701
llvm-svn: 279216
Without the synthesized reference to a symbol in the xray_instr_map,
linker section garbage collection will helpfully remove the whole
xray_instr_map section from the final executable (or archive). This will
cause the runtime to not be able to identify the sleds and hot-patch the
calls/jumps into the runtime trampolines.
This change adds a reference from the text section at the end of the
function to keep around the associated xray_instr_map section as well.
We also make sure that we catch this reference in the test.
Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo, majnemer, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, dberris
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23398
llvm-svn: 279204
The ppc64 multistage bot fails on this.
This reverts commit r279124.
Also Revert "CodeGen: Add/Factor out LiveRegUnits class; NFCI" because it depends on the previous change
This reverts commit r279171.
llvm-svn: 279199
This is a little class template that just builds an inheritance chain of
empty classes. Despite how simple this is, it can be used to really
nicely create ranked overload sets. I've added a unittest as much to
document this as test it. You can pass an object of this type as an
argument to a function overload set an it will call the first viable and
enabled candidate at or below the rank of the object.
I'm planning to use this in a subsequent commit to more clearly rank
overload candidates used for SFINAE. All credit for this technique and
both lines of code here to Richard Smith who was helping me rewrite the
SFINAE check in question to much more effectively capture the intended
set of checks.
llvm-svn: 279197
Patch by William Dillon. Thanks William!
This patch adds support for the R_ARM_REL32 and R_ARM_GOT_PREL ELF ARM
relocations to RuntimeDyld, which should allow JITing of code that
produces these relocations.
No test case: Unfortunately RuntimeDyldELF's GOT building mechanism (which
uses a separate section for GOT entries) isn't compatible with
RuntimeDyldChecker. The correct fix for this is to fix RuntimeDyldELF's GOT
support (it's fundamentally broken at the moment: separate sections aren't
guaranteed to be in range of a GOT entry load), but that's a non-trivial job.
llvm-svn: 279182
Summary: Reduce store size to avoid leading and trailing zeros.
Reviewers: kcc, eugenis
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23648
llvm-svn: 279178
The structs BarrierOp, PrefetchOp, PSBHintOp are in AArch64AsmParser.cpp
(inside anonymous namespace). This diff changes the order of fields and
removes the excessive padding (8 bytes).
Patch by Alexander Shaposhnikov!
llvm-svn: 279173
This is a set of register units intended to track register liveness, it
is similar in spirit to LivePhysRegs.
You can also think of this as the liveness tracking parts of the
RegisterScavenger factored out into an own class.
This was proposed in http://llvm.org/PR27609
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21916
llvm-svn: 279171
Krzysztof Parzyszek