llvm-project

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Richard Smith	1b8125b041	Don't assert if we find a dependently-typed variable in the redeclaration chain for an array. A prior attempt to fix this in r280330 didn't handle the case where the old variable is dependent and the new one is not. It is notable and worrying that the test case in this example forms a redeclaration chain for a non-dependent variable that includes a declaration with a dependent type. We should probably fix that too.	2020-06-16 19:41:13 -07:00
Akira Hatanaka	3e34cfe8b6	[Sema] Don't diagnose an array type mismatch when the new or previous declaration has a dependent type. This fixes a bug where clang errors out on a valid code. rdar://problem/28051467 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24110 llvm-svn: 280330	2016-09-01 01:03:21 +00:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Richard Smith

1b8125b041

Don't assert if we find a dependently-typed variable in the

redeclaration chain for an array.

A prior attempt to fix this in r280330 didn't handle the case where the
old variable is dependent and the new one is not.

It is notable and worrying that the test case in this example forms a
redeclaration chain for a non-dependent variable that includes a
declaration with a dependent type. We should probably fix that too.

2020-06-16 19:41:13 -07:00

Akira Hatanaka

3e34cfe8b6

[Sema] Don't diagnose an array type mismatch when the new or previous

declaration has a dependent type.

This fixes a bug where clang errors out on a valid code.

rdar://problem/28051467

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24110

llvm-svn: 280330

2016-09-01 01:03:21 +00:00

2 Commits