STORAGE_SIZE() is a standard inquiry intrinsic (size in bits
of an array element of the same type as the argument); SIZEOF()
is a common extension that returns the size in bytes of its
argument; C_SIZEOF() is a renaming of SIZEOF() in module ISO_C_BINDING.
STORAGE_SIZE() and SIZEOF() are implemented via rewrites to
expressions; these expressions will be constant when the necessary
type parameters and bounds are also constant.
Code to calculate the sizes of types (with and without alignment)
was isolated into Evaluate/type.* and /characteristics.*.
Code in Semantics/compute-offsets.* to calculate sizes and alignments
of derived types' scopes was exposed so that it can be called at type
instantiation time (earlier than before) so that these inquiry intrinsics
could be called from specification expressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93322
When merging use associations into a generic, we weren't handling
the case where the name that was use associated was itself a use
association. This is fixed by following that association to its
ultimate symbol (`useUltimate` in `DoAddUse`).
An example of the bug is `m12d` in `resolve17.f90`. `g` is associated
with `gc` in `m12c` which is associated with `gb` in `m12b`. It was that
last association that we weren't correctly following.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93343
Remove resolved & moot TODO comments in Common/, Parser/,
and Evaluate/. Address a pending one relating to parsing
ambiguity in DATA statement constants, handling it with
symbol table information in Semantics and adding a test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93323
From OMP 5.0 [2.17.8]
Restriction:
If memory-order-clause is release,acquire, or acq_rel, list items must not be specified on the flush directive.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan, clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89879
Patch implements restrictions from 2.17.7 of OpenMP 5.0 standard for atomic Construct. Tests for the same are added.
One of the restriction
`OpenMP constructs may not be encountered during execution of an atomic region.`
Is mentioned in 5.0 standard to be a semantic restriction, but given the stricter nature of parser in F18 it's caught at parsing itself.
This patch is a next patch in series from D88965.
Reviewed By: clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89583
The semantic analysis of index-names of FORALL statements looks up symbols with
the same name as the index-name. This is needed to exclude symbols that are
not objects. But if the symbol found is host-, use-, or construct-associated
with another entity, the check fails.
I fixed this by getting the root symbol of the symbol found and doing the check
on the root symbol. This required creating a non-const version of
"GetAssociationRoot()".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92970
Add restriction on loop construct associated with DO CONCURRENT. Add couple of tests to ensure
clause validity checks.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92533
Define Fortran derived types that describe the characteristics
of derived types, and instantiations of parameterized derived
types, that are of relevance to the runtime language support
library. Define a suite of corresponding C++ structure types
for the runtime library to use to interpret instances of the
descriptions.
Create instances of these description types in Semantics as
static initializers for compiler-created objects in the scopes
that define or instantiate user derived types.
Delete obsolete code from earlier attempts to package runtime
type information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92802
Add couple of clause validity tests for the update directive and check for
the restriction where at least self, host or device clause must appear on the directive.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92447
This patch plugs many holes in static initializer semantics, improves error
messages for default initial values and other component properties in
parameterized derived type instantiations, and cleans up several small
issues noticed during development. We now do proper scalar expansion,
folding, and type, rank, and shape conformance checking for component
default initializers in derived types and PDT instantiations.
The initial values of named constants are now guaranteed to have been folded
when installed in the symbol table, and are no longer folded or
scalar-expanded at each use in expression folding. Semantics documentation
was extended with information about the various kinds of initializations
in Fortran and when each of them are processed in the compiler.
Some necessary concomitant changes have bulked this patch out a bit:
* contextual messages attachments, which are now produced for parameterized
derived type instantiations so that the user can figure out which
instance caused a problem with a component, have been added as part
of ContextualMessages, and their implementation was debugged
* several APIs in evaluate::characteristics was changed so that a FoldingContext
is passed as an argument rather than just its intrinsic procedure table;
this affected client call sites in many files
* new tools in Evaluate/check-expression.cpp to determine when an Expr
actually is a single constant value and to validate a non-pointer
variable initializer or object component default value
* shape conformance checking has additional arguments that control
whether scalar expansion is allowed
* several now-unused functions and data members noticed and removed
* several crashes and bogus errors exposed by testing this new code
were fixed
* a -fdebug-stack-trace option to enable LLVM's stack tracing on
a crash, which might be useful in the future
TL;DR: Initialization processing does more and takes place at the right
times for all of the various kinds of things that can be initialized.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92783
Add clause validity tests for the data construct. The default clause can appear only once
and this was not enforce in the ACC.td.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91888
Add couple of clause validity tests for the update directive and check for
the restriction where at least self, host or device clause must appear on the directive.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92447
We were keeping the state of parsed equivalence sets in the class
DeclarationVisitor. A problem happened when analyzing the the specification
part of a declaration that contained an EQUIVALENCE statement followed by an
interface block. The same DeclarationVisitor object that was created for the
outer declaration was being used to analyze the specification part
of a procedure body in the interface block. When analyzing the specification
part of the procedure in the interface block, the names in the outer
declaration's EQUIVALENCE statement were erroneously compared with the names in
the arguments of the interface procedure. This resulted in a bogus error
message.
I fixed this by not checking equivalence sets when we're in an interface
block. I also added a test that will produce an error message without
this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92501
When the same generic name is use-associated from two modules, the
generics are merged into a single one in the current scope. This change
fixes some bugs in that process.
When a generic is merged, it can have two specific procedures with the
same name as the generic (c.f. module m7c in modfile07.f90). We were
disallowing that by checking for duplicate names in the generic rather
than duplicate symbols. Changing `namesSeen` to `symbolsSeen` in
`ResolveSpecificsInGeneric` fixes that.
We weren't including each USE of those generics in the .mod file so in
some cases they were incorrect. Extend GenericDetails to specify all
use-associated symbols that are merged into the generic. This is used to
write out .mod files correctly.
The distinguishability check for specific procedures of a generic
sometimes have to refer to procedures from a use-associated generic in
error messages. In that case we don't have the source location of the
procedure so adapt the message to say where is was use-associated from.
This requires passing the scope through the checks to make that
determination.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92492
Add the semantic checks for the OpenMP 4.5 - 2.15.3.3 Private clause.
1. Pointers with the INTENT(IN) attribute may not appear in a private clause.
2. Variables that appear in namelist statements may not appear in a private clause.
A flag 'InNamelist' is added to the Symbol::Flag to identify the symbols
in Namelist statemnts.
Test cases : omp-private01.f90, omp-private02.f90
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90210
Add semantic check for the cache directive. According to section 2.10 from the specification:
A var in a cache directive must be a single array element or a simple subarray.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90184
Semantic check added to check and restrict the value of the parameter in the COLLAPSE or ORDERED clause
if it is larger than the number of nested loops following the construct.
Test Cases:
omp-do-collapse-positivecases.f90
omp-do-collapse.f90
omp-do-ordered-positivecases.f90
omp-do-ordered.f90
Reviewed by: Kiran Chandramohan @kiranchandramohan , Valentin Clement @clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89860
Semantic check to restrict the appearance of a variable that is part of another variable
(as an array or structure element) in a PRIVATE or SHARED clause.
Test Cases:
omp-parallel-private01.f90
omp-parallel-private02.f90
omp-parallel-private03.f90
omp-parallel-private04.f90
omp-parallel-shared01.f90
omp-parallel-shared02.f90
omp-parallel-shared03.f90
omp-parallel-shared04.f90
Reviewed by: Kiran Chandramohan @kiranchandramohan , Valentin Clement @clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89395
This patch introduce the separate parser for the memory-order-clause from the general
OmpClauseList. This parser still creates OmpClause node and therefore can use all the feature
from TableGen and the OmpStructureChecker.
This is applied only for the Flush construct in this patch and it should be applied for
atomic as well.
This is the approach we disscussed several time during the weekly call.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan, sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91839
`OmpStructureChecker` has too much boilerplate code in source file.
This patch:
1. Use helpers from `check-directive-structure.h` and reduces the boilerplate.
2. Use TableGen infrastructure as much as possible.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90834
Add some clause validity tests for the host_data directive to avoid future regressions.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91889
Fortran defines "null-init" null pointer initializers as
being function references, syntactically, that have to resolve
to calls to the intrinsic function NULL() with no actual
arguments.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91657
When comparing LOGICAL operands using ".eq." or ".ne." we were not
guiding users to the ".eqv." and ".neqv." operations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91736
When doing out-of-tree builds, FIR tests were failing. I made a change
similar to the one by @jurahul to fix this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91654
According to section 19.4, paragraph 5, the scope of an ac-implied-do variable
is the enclosing ac-implied-do. But we were not creating new scopes upon
entry to an ac-implied-do. This was causing error messages to be erroneously
emitted.
I fixed, the code, added a test to array-constr-values.f90, added the test
folding15.f90 and corrected the test symbol05.f90.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91560
Add the semantic checks for the OpenMP 4.5 - 2.13.9 Depend clause.
1. List items in depend clause should not be zero length array sections.
2. A variable that is part of another variable like structure component
should not be specified on a depend clause.
Test cases : omp-depend01.f90, omp-depend02.f90, omp-depend03.f90
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89934
When comparing arrays whose shapes do not conform, the contant folding
code ran into problems trying to get the value of an extent that did not
exist. There were actually two problems. First, the routine
"CheckConformance()" was returning "true" when the compiler was unable
to get the extent of an array. Second, the function
"ApplyElementwise()" was calling "CheckConformance()" prior to folding
the elements of two arrays, but it was ignoring the return value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91440
An io-unit that is an internal-file-variable is syntactically identical
to a file-unit-number expression that is a variable reference. An
ambiguous unit is initially parsed as an internal-file-variable. If
semantic analysis determines that the unit is not of character type,
it is rewritten as an internal-file-variable. This modification must
retain source coordinate information.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91375
Avoid a spurious error message about a dummy procedure reference
in a specification expression by restructuring the handling of
use-associated and host-associated symbols.
Updated to fix a circular dependence between shared library
binaries that was introduced by the original patch.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91286
F18 clause 5.3.3 explicitly allows labels on program unit END statements.
Label resolution code accounts for this for singleton program units,
but incorrectly generates an error for host subprograms with internal
subprograms.
subroutine s(n)
call s1(n)
if (n == 0) goto 88 ! incorrect error
print*, 's'
contains
subroutine s1(n)
if (n == 0) goto 77 ! ok
print*, 's1'
77 end subroutine s1
88 end
Label resolution code makes a sequential pass over an entire file to
collect label information for all subprograms, followed by a pass through
that information for semantics checks. The problem is that END statements
may be separated from prior subprogram code by internal subprogram
definitions, so an END label can be associated with the wrong subprogram.
There are several ways to fix this. Labels are always local to a
subprogram. So the two separate passes over the entire file could probably
instead be interleaved to perform analysis on a subprogram as soon as the
end of the subprogram is reached, using a small stack. The stack structure
would account for the "split" code case. This might work.
It is possible that there is some not otherwise apparent advantage to
the current full-file pass design. The parse tree has productions that
provide access to a subprogram END statement "in advance". An alternative
is to access this information to solve the problem. This PR implements
this latter option.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91217
`-###` has always been supported in the new flang driver. This patch
merely makes sure that it's included when printing the help screen (i.e.
`flang-new -help`).
Avoid a spurious error message about a dummy procedure reference
in a specification expression by restructuring the handling of
use-associated and host-associated symbols.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91209
The initial approach was to go with changing parser nodes from `std::list<parser::Name>` to `OmpObjectList`, but that might have lead to illegal programs.
Resolving the symbols inside `OmpAttributeVisitor`.
Fix a couple of `XFAIL` tests.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90538
This patch add some parsing and clause validity tests for the set directive.
It makes use of the possibility introduces in patch D90770 to check the restriction
were one of the default_async, device_num and device_type clauses is required but also
not more than once on the set directive.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90771
Add the semantic checks for the OpenMP 4.5 - 2.15.4.1 copyin clause.
Resolve OpenMPThreadprivate directive since the list of items specified
in copyin clause should be threadprivate.
Test cases : omp-copyin01.f90, omp-copyin02.f90, omp-copyin03.f90,
omp-copyin04.f90, omp-copyin05.f90
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89385
When the bounds of an implied DO loop in an array constructor are
constant, the index variable of that loop is considered a constant
expression and can be used as such in the items in the value list
of the implied DO loop. Since the KIND type parameter values of items
in the value list can depend on the various values taken by such an
index, it is not possible to represent those values with a single
typed expression. So implement such loops by taking multiple passes
over the parse tree of the implied DO loop instead.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90494
This patch implements the first frontend action for the Flang parser (i.e.
Fortran::parser). This action runs the preprocessor and is invoked with the
`-E` flag. (i.e. `flang-new -E <input-file>). The generated output is printed
to either stdout or the output file (specified with `-` or `-o <output-file>`).
Note that currently there is no mechanism to map options for the
frontend driver (i.e. Fortran::frontend::FrontendOptions) to options for
the parser (i.e. Fortran::parser::Options). Instead,
Frotran::parser::options are hard-coded to:
```
std::vector<std::string> searchDirectories{"."s};
searchDirectories = searchDirectories;
isFixedForm = false;
_encoding(Fortran::parser::Encoding::UTF_8);
```
These default settings are compatible with the current Flang driver. Further
work is required in order for CompilerInvocation to read and map
clang::driver::options to Fortran::parser::options.
Co-authored-by: Andrzej Warzynski <andrzej.warzynski@arm.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88381
Use `--match-full-lines` to make sure that FileCheck doesn't match the
output against the `CHECK` lines (which, like other comments, are also
printed).
More specifically, we want to make sure that the following `check` in the
input file:
```
! CHECK: <some-fortran-input>
```
is matched by FileCheck with `<some-fortran-input>` in the generated
output. Without `--match-full-lines`, that check-line will be matched
with `!CHECK: <some-fortran-input>` instead (which is also
printed together with other contents of the file).
Adding `--match-full-lines` makes the tests stricter and this change
revealed that some `check`s were passing only because that flag was
missing. These are updated accordingly.
Reviewed By: CarolineConcatto, sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90306
peter klausler