This includes the following very useful isl commit:
commit d962967ab42323ea5ca0398956fbff6a98c782fa
Author: Sven Verdoolaege <skimo@kotnet.org>
Date: Wed Dec 18 12:05:32 2013 +0100
allow the user to impose a bound on the number of low-level operations
This should allow the user to deterministically limit the effort spent on a
computation.
llvm-svn: 200155
This removes the last isl_int dependency in the default build. There are
still some in OpenScop and Scoplib. For those isl-0.12.2 still needs to be used.
llvm-svn: 199585
For for-nodes that are translated to a set of vector lanes, we already know the
overall number of iterations. Calculating the upper bound is consequently not
necessary. This change removes the code for upper bound calculation, which was
probably copy/pasted from the code generation for the normal for-loop.
This issue was found by Sylvestre's scan-build server.
llvm-svn: 193925
When constructing a scop sometimes the exact representation of a statement or
condition would be very complex, but there is a common case which is a lot
simpler, but which is only valid under certain assumptions. The assumed context
records the assumptions taken during the construction of this scop and that need
to be code generated as a run-time test.
At the moment, we do not yet model any assumptions, but only added the
AssumedContext as well as the isl-ast generation support. As a next step,
this needs to be hooked up with the isl code generation.
if (1) /* run-time condition */
{ /* optimized code */ }
else
{ /* original code */ }
llvm-svn: 193652
We now use __isl_take to annotate the uses of the isl_set where we got the
memory management wrong.
Thanks to Rafael! His pipefail work hardened our test environment and exposed
this bug nicely.
llvm-svn: 187338
Split the old getNewValue into two parts:
1. The function "lookupAvailableValue" that return the new version of
the instruction which is already available.
2. The function calls "lookupAvailableValue", and tries to generate
the new version if it is not available yet.
llvm-svn: 187114
Orignally, we first test if a ValueMap contains a Value, and than use the
index operator to get the corresponding new value. This requires the ValueMap
to lookup the key (i.e. the old value) twice.
Now, we directly use the "lookup" function provided by DenseMap to implement
the same functionality.
llvm-svn: 185260
1. Do not allow creating new memory access record in the InstructionToAccess map
on the fly in function getAccessFor.
2. Do not allow user to modify the memory accesses returned by getAccessFor
during the code generation process.
llvm-svn: 185253
isl recently introduced isl_val as an abstract interface to represent arbitrary
precision numbers. This interface superseeds the old isl_int interface. In
contrast to the old interface which implemented arbitrary precision arithmetic
using macros that forward to the gmp library, the new library hides the math
library implementation in isl. This allows us to switch the math library used by
isl without affecting users such as Polly.
llvm-svn: 184529
In GDB when "step" through generateScalarLoad and "finish" the call, the
returned value is non NULL, however when printing the value contained in
BBMap[Load] after this stmt:
BBMap[Load] = generateScalarLoad(...);
the value in BBMap[Load] is NULL, and the BBMap.count(Load) is 1.
The only intuitive idea that I have to explain this behavior is that we are
playing with the undefined behavior of eval order of the params for the function
standing for "BBMap[Load] = generateScalarLoad()". "BBMap[Load] = " may be
executed before generateScalarLoad is called.
Here are some other possible explanations from Will Dietz <w@wdtz.org>:
The error is likely due to BBMap[Load] being evaluated first (creating
a {Load -> uninitialized } entry in the DenseMap), then
generateScalarLoad eventually accesses the same element and finds it
to be NULL (DenseMap[Old]).. Offhand I'm not sure if this is
guaranteed to be NULL or if it's uninitialized and happens to be NULL.
The same issue can also go wrong in an even worse way: the second
DenseMap access can trigger a rehash and *invalidate* the an earlier
evaluated expression (for example LHS of the assignment), leading to a
crash when performing the assignment store.
llvm-svn: 182655
When the Polly code generation was written we did not correctly update the
LoopInfo data, but still claimed that the loop information is correct. This
does not only lead to missed optimizations, but it can also cause
miscompilations in case passes such as LoopSimplify are run after Polly.
Reported-by: Sergei Larin <slarin@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 181987
BeforeBB
|
v
GuardBB
/ \
__ PreHeaderBB \
/ \ / |
latch HeaderBB |
\ / \ /
< \ /
\ /
ExitBB
This does not only remove the need for an explicit loop rotate pass, but it also
gives us the possibility to skip the construction of the guard condition in case
the loop is known to be executed at least once. We do not yet exploit this, but
by implementing this analysis in the isl code generator we should be able to
remove more guards than the generic loop rotate pass can. Another point is that
loop rotation can introduce additional PHI nodes, which may hide that a loop can
be executed in parallel. This change avoids this complication and will make it
easier to move the openmp code generation into a separate pass.
llvm-svn: 181986
Use the new cl::OptionCategory support to move the Polly options into a separate
option category. The aim is to hide most options and show by default only the
options a user needs to influence '-O3 -polly'. The available options probably
need some care, but here is the current status:
Polly Options:
Configure the polly loop optimizer
-enable-polly-openmp - Generate OpenMP parallel code
-polly - Enable the polly optimizer (only at -O3)
-polly-no-tiling - Disable tiling in the scheduler
-polly-only-func=<function-name> - Only run on a single function
-polly-report - Print information about the activities
of Polly
-polly-vectorizer - Select the vectorization strategy
=none - No Vectorization
=polly - Polly internal vectorizer
=unroll-only - Only grouped unroll the vectorize
candidate loops
=bb - The Basic Block vectorizer driven by
Polly
llvm-svn: 181295
In the classical (non -polly-codegen-scev) mode, we assume that we can always
recreate PHI nodes during code generation. This is not true. We can only
reconstruct them from the polyhedral information, in case the entire loop of the
PHI node is part of the SCoP and consequently the PHI node was translated in
the polyhedral description.
llvm-svn: 179674
Regions that have multiple entry edges are very common. A simple if condition
yields e.g. such a region:
if
/ \
then else
\ /
for_region
This for_region contains two entry edges 'then' -> 'for_region' and 'else' -> 'for_region'.
Previously we scheduled the RegionSimplify pass to translate such regions into
simple regions. With this patch, we now support them natively when the region is
in -loop-simplify form, which means the entry block should not be a loop header.
Contributed by: Star Tan <tanmx_star@yeah.net>
llvm-svn: 179586
Regions that have multiple exit edges are very common. A simple if condition
yields e.g. such a region:
if
/ \
then else
\ /
after
Region: if -> after
This regions contains the bbs 'if', 'then', 'else', but not 'after'. It has
two exit edges 'then' -> 'after' and 'else' -> 'after'.
Previously we scheduled the RegionSimplify pass to translate such regions into
simple regions. With this patch, we now support them natively.
Contributed-by: Star Tan <tanmx_star@yeah.net>
llvm-svn: 179159
During code generation we split the original entry and exit basic blocks
of the scop to make room for the newly generated code. To keep the region tree
up to date, we need to update the region tree. This patch ensures that not only
the region of the scop is updated, but also all child regions that share the
same entry or exit block.
We have now test case here, as the bug is only exposed by the subsequent commit.
The test cases of that commit also cover this bug.
Contributed-by: Star Tan <tanmx_star@yeah.net>
llvm-svn: 179158
After this commit, polly is clang-format clean. This can be tested with
'ninja polly-check-format'. Updates to clang-format may change this, but the
differences will hopefully be both small and general improvements to the
formatting.
We currently have some not very nice formatting for a couple of items, DEBUG()
stmts for example. I believe the benefit of being clang-format clean outweights
the not perfect layout of this code.
llvm-svn: 177796
Given the following code
for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
;
}
S: A[i] = 0
When code generating S using scev based code generation, we need to retrieve
the scev of 'i' at the location of 'S'. If we do not do this the scev that
we obtain will be expressed as {0,+,1}_for and will reference loop iterators
that do not surround 'S' and that we consequently do not know how to code
generate. What we really want is the scev to be instantiated to the value of 'i'
after the loop. This value is {10} and it can be code generated without
troubles.
llvm-svn: 177777
When using the scev based code generation, we now do not rely on the presence
of a canonical induction variable any more. This commit prepares the path to
(conditionally) disable the induction variable canonicalization pass.
llvm-svn: 177548
When doing SCEV based code generation, we ignore instructions calculating values
that are fully defined by a SCEV expression. The values that are calculated by
this instructions are recalculated on demand.
This commit improves the check to verify if certain instructions can be ignored
and recalculated on demand.
llvm-svn: 177313
We fix the following formatting problems found by clang-format:
- 80 cols violations
- Obvious problems with missing or too many spaces
- multiple new lines in a row
clang-format suggests many more changes, most of them falling in the following
two categories:
1) clang-format does not at all format a piece of code nicely
2) The style that clang-format suggests does not match the style used in
Polly/LLVM
I consider differences caused by reason 1) bugs, which should be fixed by
improving clang-format. Differences due to 2) need to be investigated closer
to understand the cause of the difference and the solution that should be taken.
llvm-svn: 171241
Tobias Grosser