LLVM normally prefers to minimize the number of bits set in an AND
immediate, but that doesn't always match the available ARM instructions.
In Thumb1 mode, prefer uxtb or uxth where possible; otherwise, prefer
a two-instruction sequence movs+ands or movs+bics.
Some potential improvements outlined in
ARMTargetLowering::targetShrinkDemandedConstant, but seems to work
pretty well already.
The ARMISelDAGToDAG fix ensures we don't generate an invalid UBFX
instruction due to a larger-than-expected mask. (It's orthogonal, in
some sense, but as far as I can tell it's either impossible or nearly
impossible to reproduce the bug without this change.)
According to my testing, this seems to consistently improve codesize by
a small amount by forming bic more often for ISD::AND with an immediate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50030
llvm-svn: 339472
It looks like this got left in by accident in r289794; I can't think of
any reason this check would be necessary. (Maybe it was meant to be a
check that the AND has one use? But we check that a few lines earlier.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47921
llvm-svn: 334322
This is essentially a recommit of r285893, but with a correctness fix. The
problem of the original commit was that this:
bic r5, r7, #31
cbz r5, .LBB2_10
got rewritten into:
lsrs r5, r7, #5
beq .LBB2_10
The result in destination register r5 is not the same and this is incorrect
when r5 is not dead. So this fix includes checking the uses of the AND
destination register. And also, compared to the original commit, some regression
tests didn't need changing anymore because of this extra check.
For completeness, this was the original commit message:
For the common pattern (CMPZ (AND x, #bitmask), #0), we can do some more
efficient instruction selection if the bitmask is one consecutive sequence of
set bits (32 - clz(bm) - ctz(bm) == popcount(bm)).
1) If the bitmask touches the LSB, then we can remove all the upper bits and
set the flags by doing one LSLS.
2) If the bitmask touches the MSB, then we can remove all the lower bits and
set the flags with one LSRS.
3) If the bitmask has popcount == 1 (only one set bit), we can shift that bit
into the sign bit with one LSLS and change the condition query from NE/EQ to
MI/PL (we could also implement this by shifting into the carry bit and
branching on BCC/BCS).
4) Otherwise, we can emit a sequence of LSLS+LSRS to remove the upper and lower
zero bits of the mask.
1-3 require only one 16-bit instruction and can elide the CMP. 4 requires two
16-bit instructions but can elide the CMP and doesn't require materializing a
complex immediate, so is also a win.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27761
llvm-svn: 289794
This recommits r281323, which was backed out for two reasons. One, a selfhost failure, and two, it apparently caused Chromium failures. Actually, the latter was a red herring. The log has expired from the former, but I suspect that was a red herring too (actually caused by another problematic patch of mine). Therefore reapplying, and will watch the bots like a hawk.
For the common pattern (CMPZ (AND x, #bitmask), #0), we can do some more efficient instruction selection if the bitmask is one consecutive sequence of set bits (32 - clz(bm) - ctz(bm) == popcount(bm)).
1) If the bitmask touches the LSB, then we can remove all the upper bits and set the flags by doing one LSLS.
2) If the bitmask touches the MSB, then we can remove all the lower bits and set the flags with one LSRS.
3) If the bitmask has popcount == 1 (only one set bit), we can shift that bit into the sign bit with one LSLS and change the condition query from NE/EQ to MI/PL (we could also implement this by shifting into the carry bit and branching on BCC/BCS).
4) Otherwise, we can emit a sequence of LSLS+LSRS to remove the upper and lower zero bits of the mask.
1-3 require only one 16-bit instruction and can elide the CMP. 4 requires two 16-bit instructions but can elide the CMP and doesn't require materializing a complex immediate, so is also a win.
llvm-svn: 285893
For the common pattern (CMPZ (AND x, #bitmask), #0), we can do some more efficient instruction selection if the bitmask is one consecutive sequence of set bits (32 - clz(bm) - ctz(bm) == popcount(bm)).
1) If the bitmask touches the LSB, then we can remove all the upper bits and set the flags by doing one LSLS.
2) If the bitmask touches the MSB, then we can remove all the lower bits and set the flags with one LSRS.
3) If the bitmask has popcount == 1 (only one set bit), we can shift that bit into the sign bit with one LSLS and change the condition query from NE/EQ to MI/PL (we could also implement this by shifting into the carry bit and branching on BCC/BCS).
4) Otherwise, we can emit a sequence of LSLS+LSRS to remove the upper and lower zero bits of the mask.
1-3 require only one 16-bit instruction and can elide the CMP. 4 requires two 16-bit instructions but can elide the CMP and doesn't require materializing a complex immediate, so is also a win.
llvm-svn: 281323
For the common pattern (CMPZ (AND x, #bitmask), #0), we can do some more efficient instruction selection if the bitmask is one consecutive sequence of set bits (32 - clz(bm) - ctz(bm) == popcount(bm)).
1) If the bitmask touches the LSB, then we can remove all the upper bits and set the flags by doing one LSLS.
2) If the bitmask touches the MSB, then we can remove all the lower bits and set the flags with one LSRS.
3) If the bitmask has popcount == 1 (only one set bit), we can shift that bit into the sign bit with one LSLS and change the condition query from NE/EQ to MI/PL (we could also implement this by shifting into the carry bit and branching on BCC/BCS).
4) Otherwise, we can emit a sequence of LSLS+LSRS to remove the upper and lower zero bits of the mask.
1-3 require only one 16-bit instruction and can elide the CMP. 4 requires two 16-bit instructions but can elide the CMP and doesn't require materializing a complex immediate, so is also a win.
llvm-svn: 281215
Eli Friedman