Previously, clang marked the specialization as invalid without emitting a
diagnostic. This lead to an assert in CodeGen.
rdar://41806724
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49085
llvm-svn: 337497
name. If the dependent name happened to end in a template-id (X<T>::Y<U>), we
would fail to notice that the 'typename' keyword is missing when resolving it
to a type.
It turns out that GCC has a similar bug. If this shows up in much real code, we
can easily downgrade this to an ExtWarn.
llvm-svn: 293815
to make reference to template parameters. This is only a partial
implementation; we retain the restriction that the argument must not be
type-dependent, since it's unclear how that would work given the existence of
other language rules requiring an exact type match in this context, even for
type-dependent cases (a question has been raised on the core reflector).
llvm-svn: 290647
specialized than the primary template. (Put another way, if we imagine there
were a partial specialization matching the primary template, we should never
select it if some other partial specialization also matches.)
llvm-svn: 290593
Other compilers accept invalid code here that we reject, and we need a
better error message to try to convince users that the code is really
incorrect. Consider:
class Foo {
typedef MyIterHelper<Foo> iterator;
friend class iterator;
};
Previously our wording was "elaborated type refers to a typedef".
"elaborated type" isn't widely known terminology, so the new diagnostic
says "typedef 'iterator' cannot be referenced with class specifier".
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25216
llvm-svn: 289259
The problem is that the parameter pack in a function type type alias is not
reexpanded after being transformed. Also remove an incorrect comment in a
similar function. Fixes PR26017.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21030
llvm-svn: 274566
With this patch compiler emits warning if it tries to make implicit instantiation
of a template but cannot find the template definition. The warning can be suppressed
by explicit instantiation declaration or by command line options
-Wundefined-var-template and -Wundefined-func-template. The implementation follows
the discussion of http://reviews.llvm.org/D12326.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16396
llvm-svn: 266719
Previously, many error messages would simply be "read-only variable is not
assignable" This change provides more information about why the variable is
not assignable, as well as note to where the const is located.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4479
llvm-svn: 234677
template partial ordering rules. This rule applies per pair of types being
compared, not per pair of function templates being compared.
llvm-svn: 229965
non-dependent types, in CXXScalarValueInitExprs and in the
nested-name-specifier or template arguments of a DeclRefExpr in particular.
llvm-svn: 220028
Changes diagnostic options, language standard options, diagnostic identifiers, diagnostic wording to use c++14 instead of c++1y. It also modifies related test cases to use the updated diagnostic wording.
llvm-svn: 215982
it. Diagnose with recovery if it appears after a function parameter that was
obviously supposed to be a parameter pack. Otherwise, warn if it immediately
follows a function parameter pack, because the user most likely didn't intend
to write a parameter pack followed by a C-style varargs ellipsis.
This warning can be syntactically disabled by using ", ..." instead of "...".
llvm-svn: 215408
issue 1430. Don't allow a pack expansion to be used as an argument to an alias
template unless the corresponding parameter is a parameter pack.
llvm-svn: 198833
Remove UnaryTypeTraitExpr and switch all remaining type trait related handling
over to TypeTraitExpr.
The UTT/BTT/TT enum prefix and evaluation code is retained pending further
cleanup.
This is part of the ongoing work to unify type traits following the removal of
BinaryTypeTraitExpr in r197273.
llvm-svn: 198271
There's nothing special about type traits accepting two arguments.
This commit eliminates BinaryTypeTraitExpr and switches all related handling
over to TypeTraitExpr.
Also fixes a CodeGen failure with variadic type traits appearing in a
non-constant expression.
The BTT/TT prefix and evaluation code is retained as-is for now but will soon
be further cleaned up.
This is part of the ongoing work to unify type traits.
llvm-svn: 197273
Summary:
Enforce the rule in C++11 [temp.mem]p2 that local classes cannot have
member templates.
This fixes PR16947.
N.B. C++14 has slightly different wording to afford generic lambdas
declared inside of functions.
Fun fact: Some formulations of local classes with member templates
would cause clang to crash during Itanium mangling, such as the
following:
void outer_mem() {
struct Inner {
template <typename = void>
struct InnerTemplateClass {
static void itc_mem() {}
};
};
Inner::InnerTemplateClass<>::itc_mem();
}
Reviewers: eli.friedman, rsmith, doug.gregor, faisalv
Reviewed By: doug.gregor
CC: cfe-commits, ygao
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1866
llvm-svn: 193144
Now that CorrectTypo knows how to correctly search classes for typo
correction candidates, there is no good reason to only replace an
existing CXXScopeSpecifier if it refers to a namespace. While the actual
enablement was a matter of changing a single comparison, the fallout
from enabling the functionality required a lot more code changes
(including my two previous commits).
llvm-svn: 193020
non-member function, the number of arguments in the two candidate calls
will be different (the non-member call will have one extra argument).
We used to get confused by this, and fail to compare the last argument
when testing whether the member is better, resulting in us always
thinking it is, even if the non-member is more specialized in the last
argument.
llvm-svn: 190470
r186331).
Original commit log:
If we friend a declaration twice, that should not make it visible to
name lookup in the surrounding context. Slightly rework how we handle
friend declarations to inherit the visibility of the prior
declaration, rather than setting a friend declaration to be visible
whenever there was a prior declaration.
llvm-svn: 186546
This breaks the build of basic patterns with repeated friend
declarations. See the added test case in SemaCXX/friend.cpp or the test
case reported to the original commit log.
Original commit log:
If we friend a declaration twice, that should not make it visible to
name lookup in the surrounding context. Slightly rework how we handle
friend declarations to inherit the visibility of the prior
declaration, rather than setting a friend declaration to be visible
whenever there was a prior declaration.
llvm-svn: 186331
does not substitute a sizeof-pack expression.
The solution is proposed by Richard Smith.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D869
llvm-svn: 186306
Test coverage for non-dependent pack expansions doesn't demonstrate a
failure prior to this patch (a follow-up commit improving debug info
will cover this commit specifically) but covers a related hole in our
test coverage.
Reviewed by Richard Smith & Eli Friedman.
llvm-svn: 186261
Original commit log:
If we friend a declaration twice, that should not make it visible to
name lookup in the surrounding context. Slightly rework how we handle
friend declarations to inherit the visibility of the prior
declaration, rather than setting a friend declaration to be visible
whenever there was a prior declaration.
llvm-svn: 186199
fix is.
Original commit log:
If we friend a declaration twice, that should not make it visible to
name lookup in the surrounding context. Slightly rework how we handle
friend declarations to inherit the visibility of the prior
declaration, rather than setting a friend declaration to be visible
whenever there was a prior declaration.
llvm-svn: 186185
lookup in the surrounding context. Slightly rework how we handle friend
declarations to inherit the visibility of the prior declaration, rather
than setting a friend declaration to be visible whenever there was a prior
declaration.
llvm-svn: 186040
C++1y, so stop adding the 'const' there. Provide a compatibility warning for
code relying on this in C++11, with a fix-it hint. Update our lazily-written
tests to add the const, except for those ones which were testing our
implementation of this rule.
llvm-svn: 179969
ActOnFinishFullExpr that some of its checks only apply to discarded-value
expressions. This adds missing checks for unexpanded variadic template
parameter packs to a handful of constructs.
llvm-svn: 172485
Erik Pilkington