Expand the simplification of special cases of `log()` to include `log2()`
and `log10()` as well as intrinsics and more types.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67199
llvm-svn: 373261
The i1 scalar would have been type legalized to i8, but that
doesn't guarantee anything about the upper bits. If we're going
to use it as condition we need to make sure the upper bits are 0.
I've special cased ISD::SETCC conditions since that should
guarantee zero upper bits. We could go further and use
computeKnownBits, but we have no tests that would need that.
Fixes PR43507.
llvm-svn: 373246
With this patch, compiler generated profile variables will have its own COMDAT
name for ELF format, which syncs the behavior with COFF. Tested with clang
PGO bootstrap. This shows a modest reduction in object sizes in ELF format.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68041
llvm-svn: 373241
ANY_EXTEND of v8i8 is marked Custom on AVX512 for handling extends
from v8i8. But the type legalization infrastructure will call
ReplaceNodeResults for v8i8 results. We should just defer it the
default handling instead of asserting in the default of the switch.
Fixes PR43509.
llvm-svn: 373234
This adds support for lowering variadic musttail calls. To do this, we have
to...
- Detect a musttail call in a variadic function before attempting to lower the
call's formal arguments. This is done in the IRTranslator.
- Compute forwarded registers in `lowerFormalArguments`, and add copies for
those registers.
- Restore the forwarded registers in `lowerTailCall`.
Because there doesn't seem to be any nice way to wrap these up into the outgoing
argument handler, the restore code in `lowerTailCall` is done separately.
Also, irritatingly, you have to make sure that the registers don't overlap with
any passed parameters. Otherwise, the scheduler doesn't know what to do with the
extra copies and asserts.
Add call-translator-variadic-musttail.ll to test this. This is pretty much the
same as the X86 musttail-varargs.ll test. We didn't have as nice of a test to
base this off of, but the idea is the same.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68043
llvm-svn: 373226
trigger stack protectors. Fixes PR42238.
Add test coverage for llvm.memset, as proxy for all llvm.mem*
intrinsics. There are two issues here: (1) they could be lowered to a
libc call, which could be intercepted, and do Bad Stuff; (2) with a
non-constant size, they could overwrite the current stack frame.
The test was mostly written by Matt Arsenault in r363169, which was
later reverted; I tweaked what he had and added the llvm.memset part.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67845
llvm-svn: 373220
"Captured" and "relevant to Stack Protector" are not the same thing.
This reverts commit f29366b1f5.
aka r363169.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67842
llvm-svn: 373216
The VCTP instruction will calculate the predicate masked based upon
the number of elements that need to be processed. I had inserted the
sub before the vctp intrinsic and supplied it as the operand, but
this is incorrect as the phi should directly feed the vctp. The sub
is calculating the value for the next iteration.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67921
llvm-svn: 373188
ISD::SADDO uses the suggested sequence described in the section §2.4 of
the RISCV Spec v2.2. ISD::SSUBO uses the dual approach but checking for
(non-zero) positive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47927
llvm-svn: 373187
As we perform a zext on any arguments used in the promoted tree, it
doesn't matter if they're marked as signext. The only permitted
user(s) in the tree which would interpret the sign bits are signed
icmps. For these instructions, their promoted operands are truncated
before the icmp uses them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68019
llvm-svn: 373186
This reverts r366419 because the analysis performed is within the context of
the loop and it's only valid to add wrapping flags to "global" expressions if
they're always correct.
llvm-svn: 373184
The tool reports verbose output for the DWARF debug location coverage.
The llvm-locstats for each variable or formal parameter DIE computes what
percentage from the code section bytes, where it is in scope, it has
location description. The line 0 shows the number (and the percentage) of
DIEs with no location information, but the line 100 shows the number (and
the percentage) of DIEs where there is location information in all code
section bytes (where the variable or parameter is in the scope). The line
50..59 shows the number (and the percentage) of DIEs where the location
information is in between 50 and 59 percentage of its scope covered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66526
llvm-svn: 373183
SystemZPostRewrite needs to be run before (it may emit COPYs) the Post-RA
pseudo pass also at -O0, so it should be added in addPostRegAlloc().
Review: Ulrich Weigand
llvm-svn: 373182
There's room from improvement here, but this is a decent
starting point.
There are a few minor regressions in the vector-rotate tests,
where we are now forming a vpternlog from an and before we get
a chance to form it for a bitselect that we were matching
previously. This results in an AND and an ANDN feeding the
vpternlog where previously we just had an AND after the
vpternlog. I think we can probably DAG combine the AND with
the bitselect to get back to similar codegen.
llvm-svn: 373172
For the following two cases, we currently suppress the symbols. This
patch emits them (compatible with GNU as).
* `test2_a = undef`: if `undef` is otherwise unused.
* `.hidden hidden`: if `hidden` is unused. This is the main point of the
patch, because omitting the symbol would cause a linker semantic
difference.
It causes a behavior change that is not compatible with GNU as:
.weakref foo1, bar1
When neither foo1 nor bar1 is used, we now emit bar1, which is arguably
more consistent.
Another change is that we will emit .TOC. for .TOC.@tocbase . For this
directive, suppressing .TOC. can be seen as a size optimization, but we
choose to drop it for simplicity and consistency.
llvm-svn: 373168
If we happen to have the same div in two basic blocks,
and in one of those we also happen to have the rem part,
we'd match the div-rem pair, but the wrong ones.
So let's drop overly-ambiguous assert.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43500
llvm-svn: 373167
Initially SLP vectorizer replaced all going-to-be-vectorized
instructions with Undef values. It may break ScalarEvaluation and may
cause a crash.
Reworked SLP vectorizer so that it does not replace vectorized
instructions by UndefValue anymore. Instead vectorized instructions are
marked for deletion inside if BoUpSLP class and deleted upon class
destruction.
Reviewers: mzolotukhin, mkuper, hfinkel, RKSimon, davide, spatel
Subscribers: RKSimon, Gerolf, anemet, hans, majnemer, llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29641
llvm-svn: 373166
This is an attempt to fill in some of the missing instructions from the
Cortex-M4 schedule, and make it easier to do the same for other ARM cpus.
- Some instructions are marked as hasNoSchedulingInfo as they are pseudos or
otherwise do not require scheduling info
- A lot of features have been marked not supported
- Some WriteRes's have been added for cvt instructions.
- Some extra instruction latencies have been added, notably by relaxing the
regex for dsp instruction to catch more cases, and some fp instructions.
This goes a long way to get the CompleteModel working for this CPU. It does not
go far enough as to get all scheduling info for all output operands correct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67957
llvm-svn: 373163
This allows us to reduce the use count on the condition node before
the match. This enables load folding for that operand without
relying on the peephole pass. This will be improved on for
broadcast load folding in a subsequent commit.
This still requires a bunch of isel patterns for vXi16/vXi8 types
though.
llvm-svn: 373156
The fma mutate test will not exercise what it was intended to test
once we simplify those ops immediately, but the test will still
pass with the existing CHECKs, so I'm leaving it in case that
still has minimal value.
llvm-svn: 373149
We need to propagate this information from the IR in order to be able to safely
do tail call optimizations on the intrinsics during legalization. Assuming
it's safe to do tail call opt without checking for the marker isn't safe because
the mem libcall may use allocas from the caller.
This adds an extra immediate operand to the end of the intrinsics and fixes the
legalizer to handle it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68151
llvm-svn: 373140
The majority of the code doesn't run on the X86 nodes today since
its gated by isBeforeLegalizeOps and we don't formm X86 nodes
until after that. Except for a couple special case in type
legalization. But I think we would probably break those if
some of the transforms fire on them.
I want to remove the hardcoded operand numbers and the unusual
use of UpdateNodeOperands. Being able to know which ISD opcodes
are present should help with that.
llvm-svn: 373136
profile symbol list.
Currently many existing users using profile-sample-accurate want to reduce
code size as much as possible. Their use cases are different from the scenario
profile symbol list tries to handle -- the major motivation of adding profile
symbol list is to get the major memory/code size saving without introduce
performance regression. So to keep the behavior of profile-sample-accurate
unchanged, we think decoupling these two things and using a new flag to
control the handling of profile symbol list may be better.
When profile-sample-accurate and the new flag profile-accurate-for-symsinlist
are both present, since profile-sample-accurate is a user assertion we let it
have a higher precedence.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68047
llvm-svn: 373133
With avx512, the vXi1 type is legal. And we can more easily sign
extend them to vector registers. zext requires a sign extend and
a shift.
If we can easily turn the zext into a sext we should.
llvm-svn: 373131
This is for compatibility with GNU readobj. --arm-attributes option is
left as a hidden alias due to large number of tests using it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68110
llvm-svn: 373125
We start with two separate sext's, but EarlyCSE runs before InstCombine,
so when we get them, they are a single sext, and we just ignore that.
Likewise, if we had a single sext, we don't do anything there.
llvm-svn: 373115
Summary:
This is valid for any `sext` bitwidth pair:
```
Processing /tmp/opt.ll..
----------------------------------------
%signed = sext %y
%r = shl %x, %signed
ret %r
=>
%unsigned = zext %y
%r = shl %x, %unsigned
ret %r
%signed = sext %y
Done: 2016
Optimization is correct!
```
(This isn't so for funnel shifts, there it's illegal for e.g. i6->i7.)
Main motivation is the C++ semantics:
```
int shl(int a, char b) {
return a << b;
}
```
ends as
```
%3 = sext i8 %1 to i32
%4 = shl i32 %0, %3
```
https://godbolt.org/z/0jgqUq
which is, as this shows, too pessimistic.
There is another problem here - we can only do the fold
if sext is one-use. But we can trivially have cases
where several shifts have the same sext shift amount.
This should be resolved, later.
Reviewers: spatel, nikic, RKSimon
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: efriedma, hiraditya, nlopes, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68103
llvm-svn: 373106
These two test cases use -march=systemz instead of a triple. In
particular, the used file format is then based on the default host
triple. This leads to different behaviour on different platforms.
The SystemZ implementation uses the integrated assembler for a
long time now. The mature-mc-support test can be fully enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68129
llvm-svn: 373098
Abandon describing of loaded values due to safety concerns. Loaded
values are described as derefed memory location at caller point.
At callee we can unintentionally change that memory location which
would lead to different entry being printed value before and after
the memory location clobbering. This problem is described in
llvm.org/PR43343.
Patch by Nikola Prica
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67717
llvm-svn: 373089
Summary:
An erroneously negated if-statement by an earlier (March 2019) bugfix left phi replacement/simplification under optimizeMemoryInst() in CodeGenPrepare largely inactivated. The error was found when csmith found that the same assert as in the original bug report could still be triggered in a different way. This patch fixes the bugfix. The original bug was:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41052
... and the previous fix was D59358.
Reviewers: aprantl, skatkov
Reviewed By: skatkov
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67838
llvm-svn: 373084
Summary:
Before this change the Executable function was made by duplicating the
snippet. This change adds a --repetion-mode={loop|duplicate} flag that
allows choosing between this behaviour and wrapping the snippet instructions
in a loop.
The new mode can help measurements when the snippet fits in the DSB by
short-cirtcuiting decoding. The loop adds a dec + jmp to the measurements, but
since these are not part of the critical path, they execute in parallel
with the measured code and do not impact measurements in practice.
Overview of the change:
- New SnippetRepetitor abstraction that handles repeating the snippet.
The assembler delegates repeating the instructions to this class.
- ExegesisTarget learns how to decrement loop counter and jump.
- Some refactoring of the assembler into FunctionFiller/BasicBlockFiller.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: mgorny, tschuett, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68125
llvm-svn: 373083
This caused severe compile-time regressions, see PR43455.
> Modern processors predict the targets of an indirect branch regardless of
> the size of any jump table used to glean its target address. Moreover,
> branch predictors typically use resources limited by the number of actual
> targets that occur at run time.
>
> This patch changes the semantics of the option `-max-jump-table-size` to limit
> the number of different targets instead of the number of entries in a jump
> table. Thus, it is now renamed to `-max-jump-table-targets`.
>
> Before, when `-max-jump-table-size` was specified, it could happen that
> cluster jump tables could have targets used repeatedly, but each one was
> counted and typically resulted in tables with the same number of entries.
> With this patch, when specifying `-max-jump-table-targets`, tables may have
> different lengths, since the number of unique targets is counted towards the
> limit, but the number of unique targets in tables is the same, but for the
> last one containing the balance of targets.
>
> Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60295
llvm-svn: 373060
exits"
Get a better approach in https://reviews.llvm.org/D68107 to solve the problem.
Revert the initial patch and will commit the new one soon.
This reverts commit rL372990.
llvm-svn: 373044
We can't use short granules with stack instrumentation when targeting older
API levels because the rest of the system won't understand the short granule
tags stored in shadow memory.
Moreover, we need to be able to let old binaries (which won't understand
short granule tags) run on a new system that supports short granule
tags. Such binaries will call the __hwasan_tag_mismatch function when their
outlined checks fail. We can compensate for the binary's lack of support
for short granules by implementing the short granule part of the check in
the __hwasan_tag_mismatch function. Unfortunately we can't do anything about
inline checks, but I don't believe that we can generate these by default on
aarch64, nor did we do so when the ABI was fixed.
A new function, __hwasan_tag_mismatch_v2, is introduced that lets code
targeting the new runtime avoid redoing the short granule check. Because tag
mismatches are rare this isn't important from a performance perspective; the
main benefit is that it introduces a symbol dependency that prevents binaries
targeting the new runtime from running on older (i.e. incompatible) runtimes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68059
llvm-svn: 373035
We have isel patterns that can put an IMPLICIT_DEF on one of
the sources for these instructions. So we should make sure
we break any dependencies there. This should be done by
just using one of the other sources.
llvm-svn: 373025
Similar for f64 and having a non-zero passthru value.
We were previously not trying to fold the load at all. Using
a CodeGenOnly instruction allows us to use FR32X/FR64X as the
register class to avoid a bunch of COPY_TO_REGCLASS.
llvm-svn: 373021
Summary:
This patch extends the current capabilities in loop fusion to fuse guarded loops
(as defined in https://reviews.llvm.org/D63885). The patch adds the necessary
safety checks to ensure that it safe to fuse the guarded loops (control flow
equivalent, no intervening code, and same guard conditions). It also provides an
alternative method to perform the actual fusion of guarded loops. The mechanics
to fuse guarded loops are slightly different then fusing non-guarded loops, so I
opted to keep them separate methods. I will be cleaning this up in later
patches, and hope to converge on a single method to fuse both guarded and
non-guarded loops, but for now I think the review will be easier to keep them
separate.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, Meinersbur, dmgreen, etiotto, Whitney
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65464
llvm-svn: 373018
For a runtime loop if we can compute its trip count upperbound:
Don't unroll if:
1. loop is not guaranteed to run either zero or upperbound iterations; and
2. trip count upperbound is less than UnrollMaxUpperBound
Unless user or TTI asked to do so.
If unrolling, limit unroll factor to loop's trip count upperbound.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62989
Change-Id: I6083c46a9d98b2e22cd855e60523fdc5a4929c73
llvm-svn: 373017
This patch emits the function descriptor csect for functions with definitions
under both 32-bit/64-bit mode on AIX.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66724
llvm-svn: 373009
The test case here previously infinite looped. Only one element from the GEP is used so SimplifyDemandedVectorElts would replace the other lanes in each index with undef leading to the first index being <0, undef, undef, undef>. But there's a GEP transform that tries to replace an index into a 0 sized type with a zero index. But the zero index check only works on ConstantInt 0 or ConstantAggregateZero so it would turn the index back to zeroinitializer. Resulting in a loop.
The fix is to use m_Zero() to allow a vector of zeroes and undefs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67977
llvm-svn: 373000
for extreme large case.
We had a case that a single loop which has 4000 exits and the average number
of predecessors of each exit is > 1000, and we found compiling the case spent
a significant amount of time on checking whether a loop has dedicated exits.
This patch adds a limit for the iterations to the check. With the patch, the
time to compile our testcase reduced from 1000s to 200s (clang release build).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67359
llvm-svn: 372990
Summary:
FlattenCFG merges two 'if' basicblocks by inserting one basicblock
to another basicblock. The inserted basicblock can have a successor
that contains a PHI node whoes incoming basicblock is the inserted
basicblock. Since the existing code does not handle it, it becomes
a badref.
if (cond1)
statement
if (cond2)
statement
successor - contains PHI node whose predecessor is cond2
-->
if (cond1 || cond2)
statement
(BB for cond2 was deleted)
successor - contains PHI node whose predecessor is cond2 --> bad ref!
Author: Jaebaek Seo
Reviewers: asbirlea, kuhar, tstellar, chandlerc, davide, dexonsmith
Reviewed By: kuhar
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68032
llvm-svn: 372989
Summary:
This was found during review of https://reviews.llvm.org/D66050.
In the simple test of fdiv, we miss to fold
```
fneg 2, 2
xsmaddasp 3, 2, 0
```
to
```
xsnmsubasp 3, 2, 0
```
We have the patterns for Double Precision and vectors, just missing
Single Precision, the patch add that.
Reviewers: #powerpc, hfinkel, nemanjai, steven.zhang
Reviewed By: #powerpc, steven.zhang
Subscribers: wuzish, hiraditya, kbarton, MaskRay, shchenz, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67595
llvm-svn: 372985
llvm/test/Object/ contains tests for the ArchiveWriter library, however
support for MRI scripts is found in llvm-ar and not the library. This
diff moves the MRI related tests and removes those that are duplicates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68038
llvm-svn: 372973
Summary:
Removing an assumption (assert) that the CmpInst already has been
simplified in getFlippedStrictnessPredicateAndConstant. Solution is
to simply bail out instead of hitting the assertion. Instead we
assume that any profitable rewrite will happen in the next iteration
of InstCombine.
The reason why we can't assume that the CmpInst already has been
simplified is that the worklist does not guarantee such an ordering.
Solves https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43376
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68022
llvm-svn: 372972
Implement aggregate structure split to simpler types in splitToValueTypes.
splitToValueTypes is used for return values.
According to MipsABIInfo from clang/lib/CodeGen/TargetInfo.cpp,
aggregate structure arguments for O32 always get simplified and thus
will remain unsupported by the MIPS GlobalISel for the time being.
For O32, aggregate structures can be encountered only for complex number
returns e.g. 'complex float' or 'complex double' from <complex.h>.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67963
llvm-svn: 372957
SLM is 2 x slower for <2 x i64> comparison ops than other vector types, we should account for this like we do for SLM <2 x i64> add/sub/mul costs.
This should remove some of the SLM codegen diffs in D43582
llvm-svn: 372954
With -pg -mfentry -mnop-mcount, a nop is emitted instead of the call to
fentry.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D67765
llvm-svn: 372950
Summary:
Previously the case
EBB
| \_
| |
| TBB
| /
FBB
was treated as a valid triangle also when TBB and FBB was the same basic
block. This could then lead to an invalid CFG when we removed the edge
from EBB to TBB, since that meant we would also remove the edge from EBB
to FBB.
Since TBB == FBB is quite a degenerated case of a triangle, we now
don't treat it as a valid triangle anymore, and thus we will avoid the
trouble with updating the CFG.
Reviewers: efriedma, dmgreen, kparzysz
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: bjope, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67832
llvm-svn: 372943
atomicrmw and cmpxchg have a volatile flag, so allow them to be get and set with LLVM{Get,Set}Volatile. atomicrmw and fence have orderings, so allow them to be get and set with LLVM{Get,Set}Ordering. Add missing LLVMAtomicRMWBinOpFAdd and LLVMAtomicRMWBinOpFSub enum constants. AtomicCmpXchg also has a weak flag, add a getter/setter for that too. Add a getter/setter for the binary-op of an atomicrmw.
atomicrmw and cmpxchg have a volatile flag, so allow it to be set/get with LLVMGetVolatile and LLVMSetVolatile. Add missing LLVMAtomicRMWBinOpFAdd and LLVMAtomicRMWBinOpFSub enum constants. AtomicCmpXchg also has a weak flag, add a getter/setter for that too. Add a getter/setter for the binary-op of an atomicrmw.
Add LLVMIsA## for CatchSwitchInst, CallBrInst and FenceInst, as well as AtomicCmpXchgInst and AtomicRMWInst.
Update llvm-c-test to include atomicrmw and fence, and to copy volatile for the four applicable instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67132
llvm-svn: 372938
Previously we had an assert but this can actually occur in valid user
code so we need to handle this in release builds too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67997
llvm-svn: 372934
Summary:
If a block has all incoming values with the same MemoryAccess (ignoring
incoming values from unreachable blocks), then use that incoming
MemoryAccess and do not create a Phi in the first place.
Revert IDF work-around added in rL372673; it should not be required unless
the Def inserted is the first in its block.
The patch also cleans up a series of tests, added during the many
iterations on insertDef.
The patch also fixes PR43438.
The same issue that occurs in insertDef with "adding phis, hence the IDF of
Phis is needed", can also occur in fixupDefs: the `getPreviousRecursive`
call only adds Phis walking on the predecessor edges, which means there
may be the case of a Phi added walking the CFG "backwards" which
triggers the needs for an additional Phi in successor blocks.
Such Phis are added during fixupDefs only in the presence of unreachable
blocks.
Hence this highlights the need to avoid adding Phis in blocks with
unreachable predecessors in the first place.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: Prazek, sanjoy.google, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67995
llvm-svn: 372932
Summary:
The list of indirect labels should ALWAYS have their blockaddresses as
argument operands to the callbr (but not necessarily the other way
around). Add an invariant that checks this.
The verifier catches a bad test case that was added recently in r368478.
I think that was a simple mistake, and the test was made less strict in
regards to the precise addresses (as those weren't specifically the
point of the test).
This invariant will be used to find a reported bug.
Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg753473.html
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/649
Reviewers: craig.topper, void, chandlerc
Reviewed By: void
Subscribers: ychen, lebedev.ri, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67196
llvm-svn: 372923
Because we do not constant fold multiplications in SimplifyFMAMul,
we match 1.0 and 0.0 for both operands, as multiplying by them
is guaranteed to produce an exact result (if it is allowed to do so).
Note that it is not enough to just swap the operands to ensure a
constant is on the RHS, as we want to also cover the case with
2 constants.
Reviewers: lebedev.ri, spatel, reames, scanon
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri, reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67553
llvm-svn: 372915
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/KtL
This also shows that the fold added in D67412 / r372257
was too specific, and the new fold allows those test cases
to be handled more generically, therefore i delete now-dead code.
This is yet again motivated by
D67122 "[UBSan][clang][compiler-rt] Applying non-zero offset to nullptr is undefined behaviour"
llvm-svn: 372912
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/KtL
This should go to InstCombiner::foldICmpBinO(), next to
"Convert sub-with-unsigned-overflow comparisons into a comparison of args."
llvm-svn: 372911
Summary:
Useful in case you want to have control over interrupt vector generation.
For example in Rust language we have an arrangement where all unhandled
ISR vectors gets mapped to a single default handler function. Which is
hard to implement when LLVM tries to generate vectors on its own.
Reviewers: asl, krisb
Subscribers: hiraditya, JDevlieghere, awygle, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67313
llvm-svn: 372910
As @reames pointed out post-commit, rL371518 adds additional rounding
in some cases, when doing constant folding of the multiplication.
This breaks a guarantee llvm.fma makes and must be avoided.
This patch reapplies rL371518, but splits off the simplifications not
requiring rounding from SimplifFMulInst as SimplifyFMAFMul.
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri, reames, scanon
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67434
llvm-svn: 372899
When checking for tail call eligibility, we should use the correct CCAssignFn
for each argument, rather than just checking if the caller/callee is varargs or
not.
This is important for tail call lowering with varargs. If we don't check it,
then basically any varargs callee with parameters cannot be tail called on
Darwin, for one thing. If the parameters are all guaranteed to be in registers,
this should be entirely safe.
On top of that, not checking for this could potentially make it so that we have
the wrong stack offsets when checking for tail call eligibility.
Also refactor some of the stuff for CCAssignFnForCall and pull it out into a
helper function.
Update call-translator-tail-call.ll to show that we can now correctly tail call
on Darwin. Also add two extra tail call checks. The first verifies that we still
respect the caller's stack size, and the second verifies that we still don't
tail call when a varargs function has a memory argument.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67939
llvm-svn: 372897
Modern processors predict the targets of an indirect branch regardless of
the size of any jump table used to glean its target address. Moreover,
branch predictors typically use resources limited by the number of actual
targets that occur at run time.
This patch changes the semantics of the option `-max-jump-table-size` to limit
the number of different targets instead of the number of entries in a jump
table. Thus, it is now renamed to `-max-jump-table-targets`.
Before, when `-max-jump-table-size` was specified, it could happen that
cluster jump tables could have targets used repeatedly, but each one was
counted and typically resulted in tables with the same number of entries.
With this patch, when specifying `-max-jump-table-targets`, tables may have
different lengths, since the number of unique targets is counted towards the
limit, but the number of unique targets in tables is the same, but for the
last one containing the balance of targets.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60295
llvm-svn: 372893
We might be able to do better on the example in the test,
but in general, we should not scalarize a splatted vector
binop if there are other uses of the binop. Otherwise, we
can end up with code as we had - a scalar op that is
redundant with a vector op.
llvm-svn: 372886
The changes here are based on the corresponding diffs for allowing FMF on 'select':
D61917 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D61917>
As discussed there, we want to have fast-math-flags be a property of an FP value
because the alternative (having them on things like fcmp) leads to logical
inconsistency such as:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38086
The earlier patch for select made almost no practical difference because most
unoptimized conditional code begins life as a phi (based on what I see in clang).
Similarly, I don't expect this patch to do much on its own either because
SimplifyCFG promptly drops the flags when converting to select on a minimal
example like:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39535
But once we have this plumbing in place, we should be able to wire up the FMF
propagation and start solving cases like that.
The change to RecurrenceDescriptor::AddReductionVar() is required to prevent a
regression in a LoopVectorize test. We are intersecting the FMF of any
FPMathOperator there, so if a phi is not properly annotated, new math
instructions may not be either. Once we fix the propagation in SimplifyCFG, it
may be safe to remove that hack.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67564
llvm-svn: 372878
Merge more Select pseudo instructions in emitSelect() by allowing other
instructions between them as long as they do not clobber CC.
Debug value instructions are now moved down to below the new PHIs instead of
erasing them.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D67619
llvm-svn: 372873
I started this patch as a refactoring, tried to make a helper for
getting symbol names, similar to how we get section names
used in warning messages.
So this patch cleanups the code and fixes an issue: symbol names
in warning messages were not demangled.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68012
llvm-svn: 372867
The changes here are based on the corresponding diffs for allowing FMF on 'select':
D61917
As discussed there, we want to have fast-math-flags be a property of an FP value
because the alternative (having them on things like fcmp) leads to logical
inconsistency such as:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38086
The earlier patch for select made almost no practical difference because most
unoptimized conditional code begins life as a phi (based on what I see in clang).
Similarly, I don't expect this patch to do much on its own either because
SimplifyCFG promptly drops the flags when converting to select on a minimal
example like:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39535
But once we have this plumbing in place, we should be able to wire up the FMF
propagation and start solving cases like that.
The change to RecurrenceDescriptor::AddReductionVar() is required to prevent a
regression in a LoopVectorize test. We are intersecting the FMF of any
FPMathOperator there, so if a phi is not properly annotated, new math
instructions may not be either. Once we fix the propagation in SimplifyCFG, it
may be safe to remove that hack.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67564
llvm-svn: 372866
This is a follow-up for D67757,
which allows to describe .stack_sizes sections with a new
YAML syntax.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67759
llvm-svn: 372855
Currently we can't use unique suffixes in section names to describe
stack sizes sections. E.g. '.stack_sizes [1]' will be treated as a regular section.
This happens because we recognize stack sizes section by name and
do not yet drop the suffix before the check.
The patch fixes it.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68018
llvm-svn: 372853
It is a follow-up requested in the review comment
for D67757. Allows to use Content + Size or just Size
when describing .stack_sizes sections in YAML document
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67958
llvm-svn: 372845
During legalisation we can end up with some pretty strange nodes, like shifts
of 0. We need to make sure we don't try to make long shifts of these, ending up
with invalid assembly instructions. A long shift with a zero immediate actually
encodes a shift by 32.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67664
llvm-svn: 372839
The crash might happen when we have either a broken or unsupported object
and trying to resolve relocations when dumping the .stack_sizes section.
For the test case I used a 32-bits ELF header and a 64-bit relocation.
In this case a null pointer is returned by the code instead of the relocation
resolver function and then we crash.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67962
llvm-svn: 372838
I think we should be able to use shl instead of sshl and ushl for
positive constant shift values, unless I am missing something.
We already have the machinery in place to ensure we only replace
nodes, if the shift value is positive and <= the element width.
This is a generalization of an earlier patch rL372565.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, samparker, dmgreen, anemet
Reviewed By: anemet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67955
llvm-svn: 372824
-B is ignored for GNU objcopy compatibility after D67215/r371914.
* Delete mentions of -B from input-output-target.test - we have enough -B tests.
* Merge binary-input-with-arch.test into binary-output-target.test.
Reviewed By: rupprecht
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67693
llvm-svn: 372809
Currently, if an array element type size is 0, the number of
array elements will be set to 0, regardless of what user
specified. This implementation is done in the beginning where
BTF is mostly used to calculate the member offset.
For example,
struct s {};
struct s1 {
int b;
struct s a[2];
};
struct s1 s1;
The BTF will have struct "s1" member "a" with element count 0.
Now BTF types are used for compile-once and run-everywhere
relocations and we need more precise type representation
for type comparison. Andrii reported the issue as there
are differences between original structure and BTF-generated
structure.
This patch made the change to correctly assign "2"
as the number elements of member "a".
Some dead codes related to ElemSize compuation are also removed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67979
llvm-svn: 372785
If we generate the gc.relocate, and then later prove two arguments to the statepoint are equivalent, we should canonicalize the gc.relocate to the form we would have produced if this had been known before rewriting.
llvm-svn: 372771
Summary:
This is again motivated by D67122 sanitizer check enhancement.
That patch seemingly worsens `-fsanitize=pointer-overflow`
overhead from 25% to 50%, which strongly implies missing folds.
For
```
#include <cassert>
char* test(char& base, signed long offset) {
__builtin_assume(offset < 0);
return &base + offset;
}
```
We produce
https://godbolt.org/z/r40U47
and again those two icmp's can be merged:
```
Name: 0
Pre: C != 0
%adjusted = add i8 %base, C
%not_null = icmp ne i8 %adjusted, 0
%no_underflow = icmp ult i8 %adjusted, %base
%r = and i1 %not_null, %no_underflow
=>
%neg_offset = sub i8 0, C
%r = icmp ugt i8 %base, %neg_offset
```
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ALaphttps://rise4fun.com/Alive/slnN
There are 3 other variants of this pattern,
i believe they all will go into InstSimplify.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43259
Reviewers: spatel, xbolva00, nikic
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: efriedma, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67849
llvm-svn: 372768
Summary:
This is again motivated by D67122 sanitizer check enhancement.
That patch seemingly worsens `-fsanitize=pointer-overflow`
overhead from 25% to 50%, which strongly implies missing folds.
This pattern isn't exactly what we get there
(strict vs. non-strict predicate), but this pattern does not
require known-bits analysis, so it is best to handle it first.
```
Name: 0
%adjusted = add i8 %base, %offset
%not_null = icmp ne i8 %adjusted, 0
%no_underflow = icmp ule i8 %adjusted, %base
%r = and i1 %not_null, %no_underflow
=>
%neg_offset = sub i8 0, %offset
%r = icmp ugt i8 %base, %neg_offset
```
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/knp
There are 3 other variants of this pattern,
they all will go into InstSimplify:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/bIDZhttps://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43259
Reviewers: spatel, xbolva00, nikic
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, majnemer, vsk, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67846
llvm-svn: 372767
.stack_sizes is a SHT_PROGBITS section that contains pairs of
<address (4/8 bytes), stack size (uleb128)>.
This patch teach tools to parse and dump it.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67757
llvm-svn: 372762
Similar to rL372717, we can force the splitting of extends of vector loads in
MVE, in order to use the better widening loads as opposed to going through
expensive extends. This adds a combine to early-on detect extends of loads and
split the load in two, from where normal legalisation will kick in and we get a
series of widening loads.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67909
llvm-svn: 372721
MVE does not have a simple sign extend instruction that can move elements
across lanes. We currently often end up moving each lane into and out of a GPR,
in order to get elements into the correct places. When we have a store of a
trunc (or a extend of a load), we can instead just split the store/load in two,
using the narrowing/widening load/store instructions from each half of the
vector.
This does that for stores. It happens very early in a store combine, so as to
easily detect the truncates. (It would be possible to do this later, but that
would involve looking through a buildvector of extract elements. Not impossible
but this way seemed simpler).
By enabling store combines we also get a vmovdrr combine for free, helping some
other tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67828
llvm-svn: 372717
Summary:
The functions different in two ways:
- getLLVMRegNum could return both "eh" and "other" dwarf register
numbers, while getLLVMRegNumFromEH only returned the "eh" number.
- getLLVMRegNum asserted if the register was not found, while the second
function returned -1.
The second distinction was pretty important, but it was very hard to
infer that from the function name. Aditionally, for the use case of
dumping dwarf expressions, we needed a function which can work with both
kinds of number, but does not assert.
This patch solves both of these issues by merging the two functions into
one, returning an Optional<unsigned> value. While the same thing could
be achieved by adding an "IsEH" argument to the (renamed)
getLLVMRegNumFromEH function, it seemed better to avoid the confusion of
two functions and put the choice of asserting into the hands of the
caller -- if he checks the Optional value, he can safely process
"untrusted" input, and if he blindly dereferences the Optional, he gets
the assertion.
I've updated all call sites to the new API, choosing between the two
options according to the function they were calling originally, except
that I've updated the usage in DWARFExpression.cpp to use the "safe"
method instead, and added a test case which would have previously
triggered an assertion failure when processing (incorrect?) dwarf
expressions.
Reviewers: dsanders, arsenm, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: wdng, aprantl, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67154
llvm-svn: 372710
When vectorisation is forced with a pragma, we optimise for min size, and we
need to emit runtime memory checks, then allow this code growth and don't run
in an assert like we currently do.
This is the result of D65197 and D66803, and was a use-case not really
considered before. If this now happens, we emit an optimisation remark warning
about the code-size expansion, which can be avoided by not forcing
vectorisation or possibly source-code modifications.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67764
llvm-svn: 372694
Summary:
Fold
or(ashr(subNSW(Y, X), ScalarSizeInBits(Y)-1), X)
into
X s> Y ? -1 : X
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/d8Ab
clamp255 is a common operator in image processing, can be implemented
in a shifty way "(255 - X) >> 31 | X & 255". Fold shift into select
enables more optimization, e.g., vmin generation for ARM target.
Reviewers: lebedev.ri, efriedma, spatel, kparzysz, bcahoon
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67800
llvm-svn: 372678
We were miscompiling switch value comparisons with the wrong signedness, which
shows up when we have things like switch case values with i1 types, which end up
being legalized incorrectly.
Fixes PR43383
llvm-svn: 372675
Summary:
MemoryPhis may be needed following a Def insertion inthe IDF of all the
new accesses added (phis + potentially a def). Ensure this also occurs when
only the new MemoryPhis are the defining accesses.
Note: The need for computing IDF here is because of new Phis added with
edges incoming from unreachable code, Phis that had previously been
simplified. The preferred solution is to not reintroduce such Phis.
This patch is the needed fix while working on the preferred solution.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: Prazek, sanjoy.google, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67927
llvm-svn: 372673
Summary:
Clamp negative to zero and clamp positive to allOnes are common
operation in image saturation.
Add tests for shifty implementation of clamping, as prepare work for
folding:
and(ashr(subNSW(Y, X), ScalarSizeInBits(Y)-1), X) --> X s> 0 ? X : 0;
or(ashr(subNSW(Y, X), ScalarSizeInBits(Y)-1), X) --> X s> Y ? allOnes : X.
Reviewers: lebedev.ri, efriedma, spatel, kparzysz, bcahoon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67798
llvm-svn: 372671
When a cold path is outlined, the value tracking in the assumption cache may be
invalidated due to the code motion. We would previously trip an assertion in
subsequent passes (but required the passes to happen in a single run as the
assumption cache is shared across the passes). Invalidating the cache ensures
that we get the correct information when needed with the legacy pass manager as
well.
llvm-svn: 372667
Add support for creating universal binaries which
can contain an archive.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67758
Test plan: make check-all
llvm-svn: 372666
is available
In rL372232, we treated names showing up in profile as not cold when
profile-sample-accurate is enabled. This caused 70k size regression in
Chrome/Android. The patch put a guard and only enable the change when
profile symbol list is available, i.e., keep the old behavior when profile
symbol list is not available.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67931
llvm-svn: 372665
Summary:
Adds the new load_splat instructions as specified at
https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/blob/master/proposals/simd/SIMD.md#load-and-splat.
DAGISel does not allow matching multiple copies of the same load in a
single pattern, so we use a new node in WebAssemblyISD to wrap loads
that should be splatted.
Depends on D67783.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67784
llvm-svn: 372655
"Implementations are free to malloc() a buffer containing either (size + 1) bytes or (strnlen(s, size) + 1) bytes. Applications should not assume that strndup() will allocate (size + 1) bytes when strlen(s) is smaller than size."
llvm-svn: 372647
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66773
The OpTypes::OperandType was creating an enum for all records that
inherit from Operand, but in reality there are operands for instructions
that inherit from other types too. In particular, RegisterOperand and
RegisterClass. This commit adds those types to the list of operand types
that are tracked by the OperandType enum.
Patch by: nlguillemot
llvm-svn: 372641
Summary:
Motivation:
- If we can fold it to strdup, we should (strndup does more things than strdup).
- Annotation mechanism. (Works for strdup well).
strdup and strndup are part of C 20 (currently posix fns), so we should optimize them.
Reviewers: efriedma, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67679
llvm-svn: 372636
Evandro Menezes