AllocaInst that was missing in one location.
Debug info for optimized code: Support variables that are on the stack and
described by DBG_VALUEs during their lifetime.
Previously, when a variable was at a FrameIndex for any part of its
lifetime, this would shadow all other DBG_VALUEs and only a single
fbreg location would be emitted, which in fact is only valid for a small
range and not the entire lexical scope of the variable. The included
dbg-value-const-byref testcase demonstrates this.
This patch fixes this by
Local
- emitting dbg.value intrinsics for allocas that are passed by reference
- dropping all dbg.declares (they are now fully lowered to dbg.values)
SelectionDAG
- renamed constructors for SDDbgValue for better readability.
- fix UserValue::match() to handle indirect values correctly
- not inserting an MMI table entries for dbg.values that describe allocas.
- lowering dbg.values that describe allocas into *indirect* DBG_VALUEs.
CodeGenPrepare
- leaving dbg.values for an alloca were they are (see comment)
Other
- regenerated/updated instcombine.ll testcase and included source
rdar://problem/16679879
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3374
llvm-svn: 207165
described by DBG_VALUEs during their lifetime.
Previously, when a variable was at a FrameIndex for any part of its
lifetime, this would shadow all other DBG_VALUEs and only a single
fbreg location would be emitted, which in fact is only valid for a small
range and not the entire lexical scope of the variable. The included
dbg-value-const-byref testcase demonstrates this.
This patch fixes this by
Local
- emitting dbg.value intrinsics for allocas that are passed by reference
- dropping all dbg.declares (they are now fully lowered to dbg.values)
SelectionDAG
- renamed constructors for SDDbgValue for better readability.
- fix UserValue::match() to handle indirect values correctly
- not inserting an MMI table entries for dbg.values that describe allocas.
- lowering dbg.values that describe allocas into *indirect* DBG_VALUEs.
CodeGenPrepare
- leaving dbg.values for an alloca were they are (see comment)
Other
- regenerated/updated instcombine-intrinsics testcase and included source
rdar://problem/16679879
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3374
llvm-svn: 207130
define below all header includes in the lib/CodeGen/... tree. While the
current modules implementation doesn't check for this kind of ODR
violation yet, it is likely to grow support for it in the future. It
also removes one layer of macro pollution across all the included
headers.
Other sub-trees will follow.
llvm-svn: 206837
while checking candidate for bit field extract.
Otherwise the value may not fit in uint64_t and this will trigger an
assertion.
This fixes PR19503.
llvm-svn: 206834
The current memory-instruction optimization logic in CGP, which sinks parts of
the address computation that can be adsorbed by the addressing mode, does this
by explicitly converting the relevant part of the address computation into
IR-level integer operations (making use of ptrtoint and inttoptr). For most
targets this is currently not a problem, but for targets wishing to make use of
IR-level aliasing analysis during CodeGen, the use of ptrtoint/inttoptr is a
problem for two reasons:
1. BasicAA becomes less powerful in the face of the ptrtoint/inttoptr
2. In cases where type-punning was used, and BasicAA was used
to override TBAA, BasicAA may no longer do so. (this had forced us to disable
all use of TBAA in CodeGen; something which we can now enable again)
This (use of GEPs instead of ptrtoint/inttoptr) is not currently enabled by
default (except for those targets that use AA during CodeGen), and so aside
from some PowerPC subtargets and SystemZ, there should be no change in
behavior. We may be able to switch completely away from the ptrtoint/inttoptr
sinking on all targets, but further testing is required.
I've doubled-up on a number of existing tests that are sensitive to the
address sinking behavior (including some store-merging tests that are
sensitive to the order of the resulting ADD operations at the SDAG level).
llvm-svn: 206092
As it turns out the source of the sunkaddr can be a constant, in which case
there is not an instruction to delete, causing the cleanup code introduced in
r204833 to crash. This patch adds a dynamic check to ensure the deleted value is
in fact an instruction and not a constant.
Patch by Louis Gerbarg <lgg@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 205941
Given IR like:
%bit = and %val, #imm-with-1-bit-set
%tst = icmp %bit, 0
br i1 %tst, label %true, label %false
some targets can emit just a single instruction (tbz/tbnz in the
AArch64 case). However, with ISel acting at the basic-block level, all
three instructions need to be together for this to be possible.
This adds another transformation to CodeGenPrep to expose these
opportunities, if targets opt in via the hook.
llvm-svn: 205086
In some cases it is possible for CGP to attempt to reuse a base address from
another basic block. In those cases we have to be sure that all the address
math was either done at the same bit width, or that none of it overflowed
before it was extended.
Patch by Louis Gerbarg <lgg@apple.com>
rdar://16307442
llvm-svn: 204833
Summary:
This helps the instruction selector to lower an i64 * i64 -> i128
multiplication into a single instruction on targets which support it.
This is an update of D2973 which was reverted because of a bug reported
as PR19084.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, chapuni
Reviewed By: t.p.northover
CC: llvm-commits, alex, chapuni
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3021
llvm-svn: 203797
This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
detail
2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
iterator.
3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
Use to the User.
4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
opaque.
Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
touch all of the same lies of code.
The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
move.
However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]
llvm-svn: 203364
This helps the instruction selector to lower an i64 * i64 -> i128
multiplication into a single instruction on targets which support it.
Patch by Manuel Jacob.
llvm-svn: 203230
directly care about the Value class (it is templated so that the key can
be any arbitrary Value subclass), it is in fact concretely tied to the
Value class through the ValueHandle's CallbackVH interface which relies
on the key type being some Value subclass to establish the value handle
chain.
Ironically, the unittest is already in the right library.
llvm-svn: 202824
Move the test for this class into the IR unittests as well.
This uncovers that ValueMap too is in the IR library. Ironically, the
unittest for ValueMap is useless in the Support library (honestly, so
was the ValueHandle test) and so it already lives in the IR unittests.
Mmmm, tasty layering.
llvm-svn: 202821
name might indicate, it is an iterator over the types in an instruction
in the IR.... You see where this is going.
Another step of modularizing the support library.
llvm-svn: 202815
CodeGenPrepare uses extensively TargetLowering which is part of libLLVMCodeGen.
This is a layer violation which would introduce eventually a dependence on
CodeGen in ScalarOpts.
Move CodeGenPrepare into libLLVMCodeGen to avoid that.
Follow-up of <rdar://problem/15519855>
llvm-svn: 201912
Adrian Prantl