if the type's declaration was previously instantiated in an unimported module.
(For an imported type definition, this already worked, because the source
location is set to the location of the definition, but for locally-instantiated
type definitions, it did not.)
llvm-svn: 203425
Clang might crash while reading the precompiled headers if
we don't initialize the AttrEnumOperandLoc properly.
This commit fixes the combination of string attribute
operand and enum operand. Besides, this commit also adds
several assertions to avoid unexpected operand kind.
llvm-svn: 203416
This is a reapplication of r203236 with modifications to the definition of attrs() and following the new style guidelines on auto usage.
llvm-svn: 203362
getTypeSize (which rounds up sizes) in order to issue diagnostics
when casting to mismatched vector sizes; instead of crashing in IRGen.
// rdar:// 16196902. Reviewed offline by John McCall.
llvm-svn: 203175
Note that for backwards compatibility, an unnamed capability will default to being a "mutex." This allows the deprecated lockable attribute to continue to function.
llvm-svn: 203012
Summary:
The MSVC ABI appears to mangle the lexical scope into the names of
statics. Specifically, a counter is incremented whenever a scope is
entered where things can be declared in such a way that an ambiguity can
arise. For example, a class scope inside of a class scope doesn't do
anything interesting because the nested class cannot collide with
another nested class.
There are problems with this scheme:
- It is unreliable. The counter is only incremented when a previously
never encountered scope is entered. There are cases where this will
cause ambiguity amongst declarations that have the same name where one
was introduced in a deep scope while the other was introduced right
after in the previous lexical scope.
- It is wasteful. Statements like: {{{{{{{ static int foo = a; }}}}}}}
will make the mangling of "foo" larger than it need be because the
scope counter has been incremented many times.
Because of these problems, and practical implementation concerns. We
choose not to implement this scheme if the local static or local type
isn't visible. The mangling of these declarations will look very
similar but the numbering will make far more sense, this scheme is
lifted from the Itanium ABI implementation.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor, rnk, eli.friedman, cdavis5x
Reviewed By: rnk
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2953
llvm-svn: 202951
Per more discussion, 'objc_protocol_requires_explicit_implementation' is
refinement that it mainly adds that requirement that a protocol must be
explicitly satisfied at the moment the first class in the class hierarchy
conforms to it. Any subclasses that also conform to that protocol,
either directly or via conforming to a protocol that inherits that protocol,
do not need to re-implement that protocol.
Doing this requires first doing a pass on the super class hierarchy,
gathering the set of protocols conformed to by the super classes,
and then culling those out when determining conformance. This
two-pass algorithm could be generalized for all protocol checking,
and could possibly be a performance win in some cases. For now
we restrict this change to protocols with this attribute to isolate
the change in logic (especially as the design continues to evolve).
This change needs to be adjusted for properties as well; this
only impacts methods right now.
llvm-svn: 202948
Aaron Ballman