Rather than relying on the user to do the address calculating in
DW_AT_location we should just dump the absolute address.
rdar://problem/38513870
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47152
llvm-svn: 332873
Summary:
The positions of the DwarfVersion and AddressSize arguments were
reversed, which caused parsing for dwarf opcodes which contained
address-size-dependent operands (such as DW_OP_addr). Amusingly enough,
none of the address-size asserts fired, as dwarf version was always 4,
which is a valid address size.
I ran into this when constructing weird inputs for the DWARF verifier. I
I add a test case as hand-written dwarf -- I am not sure how to trigger
this differently, as having a DW_OP_addr inside a location list is a
fairly non-standard thing to do.
Fixing this error exposed a bug in the debug_loc.dwo parser, which was
always being constructed with an address size of 0. I fix that as well
by following the pattern in the non-dwo parser of picking up the address
size from the first compile unit (which is technically not correct, but
probably good enough in practice).
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45324
llvm-svn: 329381
Summary:
Based on Fred's patch here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D6771
I can't seem to commandeer the old review, so I'm creating a new one.
With that change the locations exrpessions are pretty printed inline in the
DIE tree. The output looks like this for debug_loc entries:
DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_data4] (0x00000000
0x0000000000000001 - 0x000000000000000b: DW_OP_consts +3
0x000000000000000b - 0x0000000000000012: DW_OP_consts +7
0x0000000000000012 - 0x000000000000001b: DW_OP_reg0 RAX, DW_OP_piece 0x4
0x000000000000001b - 0x0000000000000024: DW_OP_breg5 RDI+0)
And like this for debug_loc.dwo entries:
DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] (0x00000000
Addr idx 2 (w/ length 190): DW_OP_consts +0, DW_OP_stack_value
Addr idx 3 (w/ length 23): DW_OP_reg0 RAX, DW_OP_piece 0x4)
Simple locations without ranges are printed inline:
DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_block1] (DW_OP_reg4 RSI, DW_OP_piece 0x4, DW_OP_bit_piece 0x20 0x0)
The debug_loc(.dwo) dumping in changed accordingly to factor the code.
Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl, friss
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, hiraditya, llvm-commits, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37123
llvm-svn: 312042
Requires callers to directly associate relocations with a DataExtractor
used to read data from a DWARF section, which helps a callee not make
assumptions about which section it is reading.
This is the next step in reducing DWARFFormValue's dependence on DWARFUnit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34704
llvm-svn: 306699
This creates a new library called BinaryFormat that has all of
the headers from llvm/Support containing structure and layout
definitions for various types of binary formats like dwarf, coff,
elf, etc as well as the code for identifying a file from its
magic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33843
llvm-svn: 304864
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
This is splitted from D32228,
currently DWARF parsers code has few places that applied relocations values manually.
These places has similar duplicated code. Patch introduces separate method that can be
used to obtain relocated value. That helps to reduce code and simplifies things.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32284
llvm-svn: 300956
Removed some unused headers, replaced some headers with forward class declarations.
Found using simple scripts like this one:
clear && ack --cpp -l '#include "llvm/ADT/IndexedMap.h"' | xargs grep -L 'IndexedMap[<]' | xargs grep -n --color=auto 'IndexedMap'
Patch by Eugene Kosov <claprix@yandex.ru>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19219
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266595
All of the cases were just appending from random access iterators to a
vector. Using insert/append can grow the vector to the perfect size
directly and moves the growing out of the loop. No intended functionalty
change.
llvm-svn: 230845
In preparation for adding PDB support to LLVM, this moves the
DWARF parsing code to its own subdirectory under DebugInfo, and
renames LLVMDebugInfo to LLVMDebugInfoDWARF.
This is purely a mechanical / build system change.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7269
Reviewed by: Eric Christopher
llvm-svn: 227586
Jonas Devlieghere