The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
Because we create a new kind of debug instruction, DBG_LABEL, we need to
check all passes which use isDebugValue() to check MachineInstr is debug
instruction or not. When expelling debug instructions, we should expel
both DBG_VALUE and DBG_LABEL. So, I create a new function,
isDebugInstr(), in MachineInstr to check whether the MachineInstr is
debug instruction or not.
This patch has no new test case. I have run regression test and there is
no difference in regression test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45342
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331844
This is used by llvm tblgen as well as by LLVM Targets, so the only
common place is Support for now. (maybe we need another target for these
sorts of things - but for now I'm at least making them correct & we can
make them better if/when people have strong feelings)
llvm-svn: 328395
In -debug output we print "pred:" whenever a MachineOperand is a
predicate operand in the instruction descriptor, and "opt:" whenever a
MachineOperand is an optional def in the instruction descriptor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41870
llvm-svn: 322096
output
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format,
always use `printReg` to print all kinds of registers.
Updated the tests using '_' instead of '%noreg' until we decide which
one we want to be the default one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40421
llvm-svn: 319445
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format,
always print registers as lowercase.
* Only debug printing is affected. It now follows MIR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40417
llvm-svn: 319187
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
This header includes CodeGen headers, and is not, itself, included by
any Target headers, so move it into CodeGen to match the layering of its
implementation.
llvm-svn: 317647
Summary:
AntiDepBreaker intends to add all live-outs, including the implicit
CSRs, in StartBlock. r299124 was done without understanding that
intention.
Now with the live-ins propagated correctly (D32464), we can revert this change.
Reviewers: MatzeB, qcolombet
Subscribers: nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33697
llvm-svn: 304251
This patch reapplies r301309 with the fix to the MIR test to fix the assertion
triggered by r301309. Had trimmed a little bit too much from the MIR!
llvm-svn: 301317
This patch fixes a bug with the updating of DBG_VALUE's in
BreakAntiDependencies. Previously, it would only attempt to update the first
DBG_VALUE following the instruction whose register is being changed,
potentially leaving DBG_VALUE's referring to the wrong register. Now the code
will update all DBG_VALUE's that immediately follow the instruction.
This issue was detected as a result of an optimized codegen difference with
"-g" where an X86 byte/word fixup was not performed due to a DBG_VALUE
referencing the wrong register.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31755
llvm-svn: 301309
Each Calling convention (CC) defines a static list of registers that should be preserved by a callee function. All other registers should be saved by the caller.
Some CCs use additional condition: If the register is used for passing/returning arguments – the caller needs to save it - even if it is part of the Callee Saved Registers (CSR) list.
The current LLVM implementation doesn’t support it. It will save a register if it is part of the static CSR list and will not care if the register is passed/returned by the callee.
The solution is to dynamically allocate the CSR lists (Only for these CCs). The lists will be updated with actual registers that should be saved by the callee.
Since we need the allocated lists to live as long as the function exists, the list should reside inside the Machine Register Info (MRI) which is a property of the Machine Function and managed by it (and has the same life span).
The lists should be saved in the MRI and populated upon LowerCall and LowerFormalArguments.
The patch will also assist to implement future no_caller_saved_regsiters attribute intended for interrupt handler CC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28566
llvm-svn: 297715
Previously, HandleLastUse would delete RegRef information for sub-registers
if they were dead even if their corresponding super-register were still live.
If the super-register were later renamed, then the definitions of the
sub-register would not be updated appropriately. This patch alters the
behavior so that RegInfo information for sub-registers is only deleted when
the sub-register and super-register are both dead.
This resolves PR26775. This is the mirror image of Hal's r227311 commit.
Author: Tom Jablin (tjablin)
Reviewers: kbarton uweigand nemanjai hfinkel
http://reviews.llvm.org/D18448
llvm-svn: 265097
Take parameters as MachineInstr& instead of MachineInstr* in
AntiDepBreaker API, since these are required to be non-null. No
functionality change intended. Looking toward PR26753.
llvm-svn: 262145
Change TargetInstrInfo API to take `MachineInstr&` instead of
`MachineInstr*` in the functions related to predicated instructions
(I'll try to come back later and get some of the rest). All of these
functions require non-null parameters already, so references are more
clear. As a bonus, this happens to factor away a host of implicit
iterator => pointer conversions.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 261605
AggressiveAntiDepBreaker was renaming registers specified by the user
for inline assembly. While this will work for compiler-specified
registers, it won't work for user-specified registers, and at the time
this runs, I don't currently see a way to distinguish them.
llvm-svn: 254532
With subregister liveness enabled we can detect the case where only
parts of a register are live in, this is expressed as a 32bit lanemask.
The current code only keeps registers in the live-in list and therefore
enumerated all subregisters affected by the lanemask. This turned out to
be too conservative as the subregister may also cover additional parts
of the lanemask which are not live. Expressing a given lanemask by
enumerating a minimum set of subregisters is computationally expensive
so the best solution is to simply change the live-in list to store the
lanemasks as well. This will reduce memory usage for targets using
subregister liveness and slightly increase it for other targets
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12442
llvm-svn: 247171
AggressiveAntiDepBreaker was doing some EarlyClobber checking, but was not
checking that the register being potentially renamed was defined by an
early-clobber def where there was also a use, in that instruction, of the
register being considered as the target of the rename. Fixes PR24014.
llvm-svn: 246423
About pristine regsiters:
Pristine registers "hold a value that is useless to the current
function, but that must be preserved - they are callee saved registers
that have not been saved." This concept saves compile time as it frees
the prologue/epilogue inserter from adding every such register to every
basic blocks live-in list.
However the current code in getPristineRegs is formulated in a
complicated way: Inside the function prologue and epilogue all callee
saves are considered pristine, while in the rest of the code only the
non-saved ones are considered pristine. This requires logic to
differentiate between prologue/epilogue and the rest and in the presence
of shrink-wrapping this even becomes complicated/expensive. It's also
unnecessary because the prologue epilogue inserters already mark
callee-save registers that are saved/restores properly in the respective
blocks in the prologue/epilogue (see updateLiveness() in
PrologueEpilogueInserter.cpp). So only declaring non-saved/restored
callee saved registers as pristine just works.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10101
llvm-svn: 238524
The aggressive anti-dep breaker, used by the PowerPC backend during post-RA
scheduling (but is available to all targets), did not handle early-clobber MI
operands (at all). When constructing the list of available registers for the
replacement of some def operand, check the using instructions, and remove
registers assigned to early-clobbered defs from the set.
Fixes PR21452.
llvm-svn: 223727
This is to be consistent with StringSet and ultimately with the standard
library's associative container insert function.
This lead to updating SmallSet::insert to return pair<iterator, bool>,
and then to update SmallPtrSet::insert to return pair<iterator, bool>,
and then to update all the existing users of those functions...
llvm-svn: 222334
Indices into the table are stored in each MCRegisterClass instead of a pointer. A new method, getRegClassName, is added to MCRegisterInfo and TargetRegisterInfo to lookup the string in the table.
llvm-svn: 222118
shorter/easier and have the DAG use that to do the same lookup. This
can be used in the future for TargetMachine based caching lookups from
the MachineFunction easily.
Update the MIPS subtarget switching machinery to update this pointer
at the same time it runs.
llvm-svn: 214838
This is a follow-up to the activity in the bug at
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18663 . The underlying issue has
to do with how the KILL pseudo-instruction is handled. I defer to
Hal/Jakob/Uli for additional details and background.
This will disable the (bad?) assert, add an associated fixme comment,
and add a pair of tests.
The code change and the pr18663-2.ll test are copied from the referenced
bug. That test does not immediately fail in my environment, but I have
added the pr18663.ll test which does.
(Comment from Hal)
to provide everyone else with some context, this assert was not bad when
it was written. At that time, we only generated KILL pseudo instructions
around subregister copies. This logic, unfortunately, had its own problems.
In r199797, the relevant logic in MachineCopyPropagation was replaced to
generate KILLs for other kinds of copies too. This change in semantics broke
this now-problematic assumption in AggressiveAntiDepBreaker. The
AggressiveAntiDepBreaker really needs a proper cleanup to deal with the
change, but removing the assert (which just allows the function to return
false) is a safe conservative behavior, and should do for the time being.
llvm-svn: 214429
define below all header includes in the lib/CodeGen/... tree. While the
current modules implementation doesn't check for this kind of ODR
violation yet, it is likely to grow support for it in the future. It
also removes one layer of macro pollution across all the included
headers.
Other sub-trees will follow.
llvm-svn: 206837
The aggressive anti-dependency breaker scans instructions, bottom-up, within the
scheduling region in order to find opportunities where register renaming can
be used to break anti-dependencies.
Unfortunately, the aggressive anti-dep breaker was treating a register definition
as defining all of that register's aliases (including super registers). This behavior
is incorrect when the super register is live and there are other definitions of
subregisters of the super register.
For example, given the following sequence:
%CR2EQ<def> = CROR %CR3UN, %CR3UN<kill>
%CR2GT<def> = IMPLICIT_DEF
%X4<def> = MFOCRF8 %CR2
the analysis of the first subregister definition would work as expected:
Anti: %CR2GT<def> = IMPLICIT_DEF
Def Groups: CR2GT=g194->g0(via CR2)
Antidep reg: CR2GT (zero group)
Use Groups:
but the analysis of the second one would not:
Anti: %CR2EQ<def> = CROR %CR3UN, %CR3UN<kill>
Def Groups: CR2EQ=g195
Antidep reg: CR2EQ
Rename Candidates for Group g195: ...
because, when processing the %CR2GT<def>, we'd mark all super registers of
%CR2GT (%CR2 in this case) as defined. As a result, when processing
%CR2EQ<def>, %CR2 no longer appears to be live, and %CR2EQ<def>'s group is not
%unioned with the %CR2 group.
I don't have an in-tree test case for this yet (and even if I did, I don't have
a small one).
llvm-svn: 202294
If no register classes are added to CriticalPathRCs, then the CriticalPathSet
bitmask will be empty. In that case, ExcludeRegs must remain NULL or else this
line will cause a segfault:
} else if ((ExcludeRegs != NULL) && ExcludeRegs->test(AntiDepReg)) {
I have no in-tree test case.
llvm-svn: 190584
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
Nicola Zaghen