Summary:
Require DominatorTree when requiring/preserving LoopInfo in the old pass manager
BreakCriticalEdges tries to keep LoopInfo and DominatorTree updated if they
exist. However, since commit r321653 and r321805, to update LoopInfo we
must have a DominatorTree, or we will hit an assert.
To fix this we now make a couple of passes that only required/preserved
LoopInfo also require DominatorTree.
This solves PR37334.
Reviewers: eli.friedman, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: efriedma, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46829
llvm-svn: 332583
Summary:
The motivation is the same as in D22141: In order to add the hotness
attribute to optimization remarks we need BFI to be available in all
passes that emit optimization remarks. BFI depends on BPI so unless we
make this lazy as well we would still compute BPI unconditionally.
The solution is to use the new LazyBPI pass in LazyBFI and only compute
BPI when computation of BFI is requested by the client.
I extended the laziness test using a LoopDistribute test to also cover
BPI.
Reviewers: hfinkel, davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22835
llvm-svn: 277083
Summary:
This is necessary for D21771. In order to add the hotness attribute to
optimization remarks we need BFI to be available in all passes that emit
optimization remarks.
However we don't want to pay for computing BFI unless the hotness
attribute is requested.
This is achieved by making BFI lazy at the very high-level through a new
analysis pass -- BFI is not calculated unless requested.
I am adding a test to check the laziness under D21771 where the first
user of the analysis is added.
Reviewers: hfinkel, dexonsmith, davidxl
Subscribers: davidxl, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22141
llvm-svn: 275250
Mikael Holmen