Apple's iOS, tvOS and watchOS simulator platforms have never been clearly
distinguished in the target triples. Even though they are intended to
behave similarly to the corresponding device platforms, they have separate
SDKs and are really separate platforms from the compiler's perspective.
Clang now defines a macro when building for one of these simulator platforms
(r297866) but that relies on the very indirect mechanism of checking to see
which option was used to specify the minimum deployment target. That is not
so great. Swift would also like to distinguish these simulator platforms in
a similar way, but unlike Clang, Swift does not use a separate option to
specify the minimum deployment target -- it uses a -target option to
specify the target triple directly, including the OS version number.
Using a different target triple for the simulator platforms is a much
more direct and obvious way to specify this. Putting the "simulator" in
the environment component of the triple means the OS values can stay the
same and existing code the looks at the OS field will not be affected.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39143
rdar://problem/34729432
llvm-svn: 316380
Implement a localised graph builder for indirect control flow
instructions. Main interface is through GraphBuilder::buildFlowGraph,
which will build a flow graph around an indirect CF instruction. Various
modifications to FileVerifier are also made to const-expose some members
needed for machine code analysis done by the graph builder.
Reviewers: vlad.tsyrklevich
Reviewed By: vlad.tsyrklevich
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kcc, pcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38427
llvm-svn: 316372
Summary:
Support formatting formatv_objects.
While here, fix documentation about member-formatters, and attempted
perfect-forwarding (I think).
Reviewers: zturner
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38997
llvm-svn: 316330
The method IEEEFloat::convertFromStringSpecials() does not recognize
the "+Inf" and "-Inf" strings but these strings are printed for
the double Infinities by the IEEEFloat::toString().
This patch adds the "+Inf" and "-Inf" strings to the list of recognized
patterns in IEEEFloat::convertFromStringSpecials().
Reviewers: sberg, bogner, majnemer, timshen, rnk, skatkov, gottesmm, bkramer, scanon
Reviewed By: skatkov
Subscribers: apilipenko, reames, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38030
llvm-svn: 316156
LineCoverageIterator makes it easy for clients of coverage data to
determine line execution counts for a file or function. The coverage
iteration logic is tricky enough that it really pays not to have
multiple copies of it. Hopefully having just one implementation in LLVM
will make the iteration logic easier to test, reuse, and update.
This commit is NFC but I've added a unit test to go along with it just
because it's easy to do now.
llvm-svn: 316141
Summary:
llvm-cfi-verify (D38379) introduced a potential build failure when compiling with `-DLLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=ON -DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON`. Specific versions of cmake seem to treat the `add_subdirectory()` rule differently. It seems as if old versions of cmake BFS these rules, adding them to the fringe for expansion later. Newer versions of cmake seem to immediately execute CMakeFiles that are present in this subdirectory.
If the subdirectory is expanded through the fringe, the globbing resultant from `llvm_add_implicit_projects()` from `cmake/modules/AddLLVM.cmake:1012` means that `tools/llvm-shlib/CMakeFile.txt` gets executed before `tools/llvm-cfi-verify/lib/CMakeFile.txt`. As the latter CMakeFile adds a new library, this expansion order means that the library files required the unit tests in `unittests/tools/llvm-cfi-verify/` are not present in the dynamic library. This causes unit tests to fail as the required functions can't be found.
This change now ensures that the libraries created by `llvm-cfi-verify` are statically linked into the unit tests. As `tools/llvm-cfi-verify/lib` no longer adds anything to `llvm-shlib`, there should be no concern about the order-of-compilation.
Reviewers: skatkov, pcc
Reviewed By: skatkov, pcc
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kcc, pcc, aheejin, vlad.tsyrklevich, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39020
llvm-svn: 316059
This reverts commit r315713. It causes PR34968.
I think I know what the problem is, but I don't think I'll have time to fix it
this week.
llvm-svn: 315962
This patch adds the ability to perform IPSCCP-like interprocedural analysis to
the generic sparse propagation solver. The patch gives clients the ability to
define their own custom LatticeKey types that the generic solver maps to custom
LatticeVal types. The custom lattice keys can be used, for example, to
distinguish among mappings for regular values, values returned from functions,
and values stored in global variables. Clients are responsible for defining how
to convert between LatticeKeys and LLVM Values by providing a specialization of
the LatticeKeyInfo template.
The added unit tests demonstrate how the generic solver can be used to perform
a simplified version of interprocedural constant propagation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37353
llvm-svn: 315919
Summary:
This change uses the loop use list added in the previous change to remember the
loops that appear in the trip count expressions of other loops; and uses it in
forgetLoop. This lets us not scan every loop in the function on a forgetLoop
call.
With this change we no longer invalidate clear out backedge taken counts on
forgetValue. I think this is fine -- the contract is that SCEV users must call
forgetLoop(L) if their change to the IR could have changed the trip count of L;
solely calling forgetValue on a value feeding into the backedge condition of L
is not enough. Moreover, I don't think we can strengthen forgetValue to be
sufficient for invalidating trip counts without significantly re-architecting
SCEV. For instance, if we have the loop:
I = *Ptr;
E = I + 10;
do {
// ...
} while (++I != E);
then the backedge taken count of the loop is 9, and it has no reference to
either I or E, i.e. there is no way in SCEV today to re-discover the dependency
of the loop's trip count on E or I. So a SCEV client cannot change E to (say)
"I + 20", call forgetValue(E) and expect the loop's trip count to be updated.
Reviewers: atrick, sunfish, mkazantsev
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38435
llvm-svn: 315713
Summary:
Currently we do not correctly invalidate memoized results for add recurrences
that were created directly (i.e. they were not created from a `Value`). This
change fixes this by keeping loop use lists and using the loop use lists to
determine which SCEV expressions to invalidate.
Here are some statistics on the number of uses of in the use lists of all loops
on a clang bootstrap (config: release, no asserts):
Count: 731310
Min: 1
Mean: 8.555150
50th %time: 4
95th %tile: 25
99th %tile: 53
Max: 433
Reviewers: atrick, sunfish, mkazantsev
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38434
llvm-svn: 315672
Reverting to investigate layering effects of MCJIT not linking
libCodeGen but using TargetMachine::getNameWithPrefix() breaking the
lldb bots.
This reverts commit r315633.
llvm-svn: 315637
Merge LLVMTargetMachine into TargetMachine.
- There is no in-tree target anymore that just implements TargetMachine
but not LLVMTargetMachine.
- It should still be possible to stub out all the various functions in
case a target does not want to use lib/CodeGen
- This simplifies the code and avoids methods ending up in the wrong
interface.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38489
llvm-svn: 315633
MachineInstr::isIdenticalTo has a lot of logic for dealing with register
Defs (i.e. deciding whether to take them into account or ignore them).
This logic gets things wrong in some obscure cases, for instance if an
operand is not a Def for both the current MI and the one we are
comparing to.
I'm not sure if it's possible for this to happen for regular register
operands, but it may happen in the ARM backend for special operands
which use sentinel values for the register (i.e. 0, which is neither a
physical register nor a virtual one).
This causes MachineInstrExpressionTrait::isEqual (which uses
MachineInstr::isIdenticalTo) to return true for the following
instructions, which are the same except for the fact that one sets the
flags and the other one doesn't:
%1114 = ADDrsi %1113, %216, 17, 14, _, def _
%1115 = ADDrsi %1113, %216, 17, 14, _, _
OTOH, MachineInstrExpressionTrait::getHashValue returns different values
for the 2 instructions due to the different isDef on the last operand.
In practice this means that when trying to add those instructions to a
DenseMap, they will be considered different because of their different
hash values, but when growing the map we might get an assertion while
copying from the old buckets to the new buckets because isEqual
misleadingly returns true.
This patch makes sure that isEqual and getHashValue agree, by improving
the checks in MachineInstr::isIdenticalTo when we are ignoring virtual
register definitions (which is what the Trait uses). Firstly, instead of
checking isPhysicalRegister, we use !isVirtualRegister, so that we cover
both physical registers and sentinel values. Secondly, instead of
checking MachineOperand::isReg, we use MachineOperand::isIdenticalTo,
which checks isReg, isSubReg and isDef, which are the same values that
the hash function uses to compute the hash.
Note that the function is symmetric with this change, since if the
current operand is not a Def, we check MachineOperand::isIdenticalTo,
which returns false if the operands have different isDef's.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38789
llvm-svn: 315579
The llvm-cfi-verify unit tests fail if LLVM is built without the X86
target, disable the unit tests from being built unless X86 is enabled
for now.
llvm-svn: 315556
This reverts commit 4e4ee1c507e2707bb3c208e1e1b6551c3015cbf5.
This is failing due to some code that isn't built on MSVC
so I didn't catch. Not immediately obvious how to fix this
at first glance, so I'm reverting for now.
llvm-svn: 315536
MCObjectStreamer owns its MCCodeEmitter -- this fixes the types to reflect that,
and allows us to remove the last instance of MCObjectStreamer's weird "holding
ownership via someone else's reference" trick.
llvm-svn: 315531
There's a lot of misuse of Twine scattered around LLVM. This
ranges in severity from benign (returning a Twine from a function
by value that is just a string literal) to pretty sketchy (storing
a Twine by value in a class). While there are some uses for
copying Twines, most of the very compelling ones are confined
to the Twine class implementation itself, and other uses are
either dubious or easily worked around.
This patch makes Twine's copy constructor private, and fixes up
all callsites.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38767
llvm-svn: 315530
Summary: Move llvm-cfi-verify into a class in preparation for CFI analysis to come.
Reviewers: vlad.tsyrklevich
Reviewed By: vlad.tsyrklevich
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits, pcc, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38379
llvm-svn: 315504
Summary:
This patch fixes an error in the patch to ScalarEvolution::createAddRecFromPHIWithCastsImpl
made in D37265. In that patch we handle the cases where the either the start or accum values can be
zero after truncation. But, we assume that the start value must be a constant if the accum is
zero. This is clearly an erroneous assumption. This change removes that assumption.
Reviewers: sanjoy, dorit, mkazantsev
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38814
llvm-svn: 315491
MCObjectStreamer owns its MCAsmBackend -- this fixes the types to reflect that,
and allows us to remove another instance of MCObjectStreamer's weird "holding
ownership via someone else's reference" trick.
llvm-svn: 315410
This allows clients to avoid an unnecessary fs::status() call on each
directory entry. Because the information returned by FindFirstFileEx
is a subset of the information returned by a regular status() call,
I needed to extract a base class from file_status that contains only
that information.
On my machine, this reduces the time required to enumerate a ThinLTO
cache directory containing 520k files from almost 4 minutes to less
than 2 seconds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38716
llvm-svn: 315378
This reverts commit r315363. It has a simple build failure, but more
importantly I want to confirm that unit tests run in check-all to make
sure that they don't silently break in the future.
llvm-svn: 315370
Summary: Move llvm-cfi-verify into a class in preparation for CFI analysis to come.
Reviewers: vlad.tsyrklevich
Reviewed By: vlad.tsyrklevich
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits, pcc, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38379
llvm-svn: 315363
The current implementation of rename uses ReplaceFile if the
destination file already exists. According to the documentation for
ReplaceFile, the source file is opened without a sharing mode. This
means that there is a short interval of time between when ReplaceFile
renames the file and when it closes the file during which the
destination file cannot be opened.
This behaviour is not POSIX compliant because rename is supposed
to be atomic. It was also causing intermittent link failures when
linking with a ThinLTO cache; the ThinLTO cache implementation expects
all cache files to be openable.
This patch addresses that problem by re-implementing rename
using CreateFile and SetFileInformationByHandle. It is roughly a
reimplementation of ReplaceFile with a better sharing policy as well
as support for renaming in the case where the destination file does
not exist.
This implementation is still not fully POSIX. Specifically in the case
where the destination file is open at the point when rename is called,
there will be a short interval of time during which the destination
file will not exist. It isn't clear whether it is possible to avoid
this using the Windows API.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38570
llvm-svn: 315079
Summary:
If the extracted region has multiple exported data flows toward the same BB which is not included in the region, correct resotre instructions and PHI nodes won't be generated inside the exitStub. The solution is simply put the restore instructions right after the definition of output values instead of putting in exitStub.
Unittest for this bug is included.
Author: myhsu
Reviewers: chandlerc, davide, lattner, silvas, davidxl, wmi, kuhar
Subscribers: dberlin, kuhar, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37902
llvm-svn: 315041
This came out of a recent discussion on llvm-dev
(https://reviews.llvm.org/D38042). Currently the Verifier will strip
the debug info metadata from a module if it finds the dbeug info to be
malformed. This feature is very valuable since it allows us to improve
the Verifier by making it stricter without breaking bcompatibility,
but arguable the Verifier pass should not be modifying the IR. This
patch moves the stripping of broken debug info into AutoUpgrade
(UpgradeDebugInfo to be precise), which is a much better location for
this since the stripping of malformed (i.e., produced by older, buggy
versions of Clang) is a (harsh) form of AutoUpgrade.
This change is mostly NFC in nature, the one big difference is the
behavior when LLVM module passes are introducing malformed debug
info. Prior to this patch, a NoAsserts build would have printed a
warning and stripped the debug info, after this patch the Verifier
will report a fatal error. I believe this behavior is actually more
desirable anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38184
llvm-svn: 314699
Summary:
This operating system type represents the AMDGPU PAL runtime, and will
be required by the AMDGPU backend in order to generate correct code for
this runtime.
Currently it generates the same code as not specifying an OS at all.
That will change in future commits.
Patch from Tim Corringham.
Subscribers: arsenm, nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37380
llvm-svn: 314500
/code/llvm-project/llvm/unittests/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayerTest.cpp:260:38: error: lambda capture 'this' is not used [-Werror,-Wunused-lambda-capture]
[this](decltype(ObjLayer)::ObjHandleT,
llvm-svn: 314454
Summary:
This allows sharing the lattice value code between LVI and SCCP (D36656).
It also adds a `satisfiesPredicate` function, used by D36656.
Reviewers: davide, sanjoy, efriedma
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37591
llvm-svn: 314411
Summary:
And now that we no longer have to explicitly free() the Loop instances, we can
(with more ease) use the destructor of LoopBase to do what LoopBase::clear() was
doing.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38201
llvm-svn: 314375
concept.
Add a unit-test to make sure we don't backslide, and tweak the MockBaseLayer
utility to make it easier to test this kind of thing in the future.
llvm-svn: 314374
The tar format originally supported up to 99 byte filename. The two
extensions are proposed later: Ustar or PAX.
In the UStar extension, a pathanme is split at a '/' and its "prefix"
and "suffix" are stored in different locations in the tar header. Since
"prefix" can be up to 155 byte, it can represent up to 254 byte
filename (but exact limit depends on the location of '/' character in
a pathname.)
Our TarWriter first attempt to use UStar extension and then fallback to
PAX extension.
But there's a bug in UStar header creation. "Suffix" part must be a NUL-
terminated string, but we didn't handle it correctly. As a result, if
your filename just 100 characters long, the last character was droppped.
This patch fixes the issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38149
llvm-svn: 314349
Summary:
Sanitizer blacklist entries currently apply to all sanitizers--there
is no way to specify that an entry should only apply to a specific
sanitizer. This is important for Control Flow Integrity since there are
several different CFI modes that can be enabled at once. For maximum
security, CFI blacklist entries should be scoped to only the specific
CFI mode(s) that entry applies to.
Adding section headers to SpecialCaseLists allows users to specify more
information about list entries, like sanitizer names or other metadata,
like so:
[section1]
fun:*fun1*
[section2|section3]
fun:*fun23*
The section headers are regular expressions. For backwards compatbility,
blacklist entries entered before a section header are put into the '[*]'
section so that blacklists without sections retain the same behavior.
SpecialCaseList has been modified to also accept a section name when
matching against the blacklist. It has also been modified so the
follow-up change to clang can define a derived class that allows
matching sections by SectionMask instead of by string.
Reviewers: pcc, kcc, eugenis, vsk
Reviewed By: eugenis, vsk
Subscribers: vitalybuka, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37924
llvm-svn: 314170
Bob Wilson