Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Florian Hahn b37543750c [ValueLattice] Distinguish between constant ranges with/without undef.
This patch updates ValueLattice to distinguish between ranges that are
guaranteed to not include undef and ranges that may include undef.

A constant range guaranteed to not contain undef can be used to simplify
instructions to arbitrary values. A constant range that may contain
undef can only be used to simplify to a constant. If the value can be
undef, it might take a value outside the range. For example, consider
the snipped below

define i32 @f(i32 %a, i1 %c) {
  br i1 %c, label %true, label %false
true:
  %a.255 = and i32 %a, 255
  br label %exit
false:
  br label %exit
exit:
  %p = phi i32 [ %a.255, %true ], [ undef, %false ]
  %f.1 = icmp eq i32 %p, 300
  call void @use(i1 %f.1)
  %res = and i32 %p, 255
  ret i32 %res
}

In the exit block, %p would be a constant range [0, 256) including undef as
%p could be undef. We can use the range information to replace %f.1 with
false because we remove the compare, effectively forcing the use of the
constant to be != 300. We cannot replace %res with %p however, because
if %a would be undef %cond may be true but the  second use might not be
< 256.

Currently LazyValueInfo uses the new behavior just when simplifying AND
instructions and does not distinguish between constant ranges with and
without undef otherwise. I think we should address the remaining issues
in LVI incrementally.

Reviewers: efriedma, reames, aqjune, jdoerfert, sstefan1

Reviewed By: efriedma

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76931
2020-03-31 12:50:20 +01:00
Florian Hahn 650f363bd7 [ValueLattice] Add singlecrfromundef lattice value.
This patch adds a new singlecrfromundef lattice value, indicating a
single element constant range which was merge with undef at some point.
Merging it with another constant range results in overdefined, as we
won't be able to replace all users with a single value.

This patch uses a ConstantRange instead of a Constant*, because regular
integer constants are represented as single element constant ranges as
well and this allows the existing code working without additional
changes.

Reviewers: efriedma, nikic, reames, davide

Reviewed By: efriedma

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75845
2020-03-15 11:23:46 +00:00
Florian Hahn 4878aa36d4 [ValueLattice] Add new state for undef constants.
This patch adds a new undef lattice state, which is used to represent
UndefValue constants or instructions producing undef.

The main difference to the unknown state is that merging undef values
with constants (or single element constant ranges) produces  the
constant/constant range, assuming all uses of the merge result will be
replaced by the found constant.

Contrary, merging non-single element ranges with undef needs to go to
overdefined. Using unknown for UndefValues currently causes mis-compiles
in CVP/LVI (PR44949) and will become problematic once we use
ValueLatticeElement for SCCP.

Reviewers: efriedma, reames, davide, nikic

Reviewed By: efriedma

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75120
2020-03-14 17:19:59 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 2946cd7010 Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636
2019-01-19 08:50:56 +00:00
Florian Hahn 8af01573a3 [LVI] Move LVILatticeVal class to separate header file (NFC).
Summary:
This allows sharing the lattice value code between LVI and SCCP (D36656). 

It also adds a `satisfiesPredicate` function, used by D36656.

Reviewers: davide, sanjoy, efriedma

Reviewed By: sanjoy

Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37591

llvm-svn: 314411
2017-09-28 11:09:22 +00:00