It seems the two failing tests can be simply fixed after r348037
Fix 3 cases in Analysis/builtin-functions.cpp
Delete the bad CodeGen/builtin-constant-p.c for now
llvm-svn: 348053
Kept the "indirect_builtin_constant_p" test case in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx1y.cpp
while we are investigating why the following snippet fails:
extern char extern_var;
struct { int a; } a = {__builtin_constant_p(extern_var)};
llvm-svn: 348039
This was reverted in r347656 due to me thinking it caused a miscompile of
Chromium. Turns out it was the Chromium code that was broken.
llvm-svn: 347756
This caused a miscompile in Chrome (see crbug.com/908372) that's
illustrated by this small reduction:
static bool f(int *a, int *b) {
return !__builtin_constant_p(b - a) || (!(b - a));
}
int arr[] = {1,2,3};
bool g() {
return f(arr, arr + 3);
}
$ clang -O2 -S -emit-llvm a.cc -o -
g() should return true, but after r347417 it became false for some reason.
This also reverts the follow-up commits.
r347417:
> Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures.
>
> Don't try to emit a scalar expression for a non-scalar argument to
> __builtin_constant_p().
>
> Third time's a charm!
r347446:
> The result of is.constant() is unsigned.
r347480:
> A __builtin_constant_p() returns 0 with a function type.
r347512:
> isEvaluatable() implies a constant context.
>
> Assume that we're in a constant context if we're asking if the expression can
> be compiled into a constant initializer. This fixes the issue where a
> __builtin_constant_p() in a compound literal was diagnosed as not being
> constant, even though it's always possible to convert the builtin into a
> constant.
r347531:
> A "constexpr" is evaluated in a constant context. Make sure this is reflected
> if a __builtin_constant_p() is a part of a constexpr.
llvm-svn: 347656
Summary:
As reported by @regehr (thanks!) on twitter (https://twitter.com/johnregehr/status/1057681496255815686),
we (me) has completely forgot about the binary assignment operator.
In AST, it isn't represented as separate `ImplicitCastExpr`'s,
but as a single `CompoundAssignOperator`, that does all the casts internally.
Which means, out of these two, only the first one is diagnosed:
```
auto foo() {
unsigned char c = 255;
c = c + 1;
return c;
}
auto bar() {
unsigned char c = 255;
c += 1;
return c;
}
```
https://godbolt.org/z/JNyVc4
This patch does handle the `CompoundAssignOperator`:
```
int main() {
unsigned char c = 255;
c += 1;
return c;
}
```
```
$ ./bin/clang -g -fsanitize=integer /tmp/test.c && ./a.out
/tmp/test.c:3:5: runtime error: implicit conversion from type 'int' of value 256 (32-bit, signed) to type 'unsigned char' changed the value to 0 (8-bit, unsigned)
#0 0x2392b8 in main /tmp/test.c:3:5
#1 0x7fec4a612b16 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x22b16)
#2 0x214029 in _start (/build/llvm-build-GCC-release/a.out+0x214029)
```
However, the pre/post increment/decrement is still not handled.
Reviewers: rsmith, regehr, vsk, rjmccall, #sanitizers
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: mclow.lists, cfe-commits, regehr
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53949
llvm-svn: 347258
Summary:
Compound literals, enums, file-scoped arrays, etc. require their
initializers and size specifiers to be constant. Wrap the initializer
expressions in a ConstantExpr so that we can easily check for this later
on.
Reviewers: rsmith, shafik
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, jyknight, nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53921
llvm-svn: 346455
This patch breaks Index/opencl-types.cl LIT test:
Script:
--
: 'RUN: at line 1'; stage1/bin/c-index-test -test-print-type llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl -cl-std=CL2.0 | stage1/bin/FileCheck llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl
--
Command Output (stderr):
--
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:3:26: warning: unsupported OpenCL extension 'cl_khr_fp16' - ignoring [-Wignored-pragmas]
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:4:26: warning: unsupported OpenCL extension 'cl_khr_fp64' - ignoring [-Wignored-pragmas]
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:8:9: error: use of type 'double' requires cl_khr_fp64 extension to be enabled
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:11:8: error: declaring variable of type 'half' is not allowed
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:15:3: error: use of type 'double' requires cl_khr_fp64 extension to be enabled
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:16:3: error: use of type 'double4' (vector of 4 'double' values) requires cl_khr_fp64 extension to be enabled
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:26:26: warning: unsupported OpenCL extension 'cl_khr_gl_msaa_sharing' - ignoring [-Wignored-pragmas]
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:35:44: error: use of type '__read_only image2d_msaa_t' requires cl_khr_gl_msaa_sharing extension to be enabled
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:36:49: error: use of type '__read_only image2d_array_msaa_t' requires cl_khr_gl_msaa_sharing extension to be enabled
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:37:49: error: use of type '__read_only image2d_msaa_depth_t' requires cl_khr_gl_msaa_sharing extension to be enabled
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:38:54: error: use of type '__read_only image2d_array_msaa_depth_t' requires cl_khr_gl_msaa_sharing extension to be enabled
llvm-svn: 346338
This exposes a (known) CodeGen bug: it can't cope with emitting lvalue
expressions that denote non-odr-used but usable-in-constant-expression
variables. See PR39528 for a testcase.
Reverted for now until that issue can be fixed.
llvm-svn: 346065
The goal is to use `emitConstant` in more places. Didn't move
`ComplexExprEmitter::emitConstant` because it returns a different type.
Reviewers: rjmccall, ahatanak
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: dexonsmith, erik.pilkington, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53725
llvm-svn: 345897
This patch should not introduce any behavior changes. It consists of
mostly one of two changes:
1. Replacing fall through comments with the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro
2. Inserting 'break' before falling through into a case block consisting
of only 'break'.
We were already using this warning with GCC, but its warning behaves
slightly differently. In this patch, the following differences are
relevant:
1. GCC recognizes comments that say "fall through" as annotations, clang
doesn't
2. GCC doesn't warn on "case N: foo(); default: break;", clang does
3. GCC doesn't warn when the case contains a switch, but falls through
the outer case.
I will enable the warning separately in a follow-up patch so that it can
be cleanly reverted if necessary.
Reviewers: alexfh, rsmith, lattner, rtrieu, EricWF, bollu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53950
llvm-svn: 345882
I fully expected for that to be handled by the canonical type check,
but it clearly wasn't. Sadly, somehow it hide until now.
Reported by Eli Friedman.
llvm-svn: 345816
This is the second half of Implicit Integer Conversion Sanitizer.
It completes the first half, and finally makes the sanitizer
fully functional! Only the bitfield handling is missing.
Summary:
C and C++ are interesting languages. They are statically typed, but weakly.
The implicit conversions are allowed. This is nice, allows to write code
while balancing between getting drowned in everything being convertible,
and nothing being convertible. As usual, this comes with a price:
```
void consume(unsigned int val);
void test(int val) {
consume(val);
// The 'val' is `signed int`, but `consume()` takes `unsigned int`.
// If val is negative, then consume() will be operating on a large
// unsigned value, and you may or may not have a bug.
// But yes, sometimes this is intentional.
// Making the conversion explicit silences the sanitizer.
consume((unsigned int)val);
}
```
Yes, there is a `-Wsign-conversion`` diagnostic group, but first, it is kinda
noisy, since it warns on everything (unlike sanitizers, warning on an
actual issues), and second, likely there are cases where it does **not** warn.
The actual detection is pretty easy. We just need to check each of the values
whether it is negative, and equality-compare the results of those comparisons.
The unsigned value is obviously non-negative. Zero is non-negative too.
https://godbolt.org/g/w93oj2
We do not have to emit the check *always*, there are obvious situations
where we can avoid emitting it, since it would **always** get optimized-out.
But i do think the tautological IR (`icmp ult %x, 0`, which is always false)
should be emitted, and the middle-end should cleanup it.
This sanitizer is in the `-fsanitize=implicit-conversion` group,
and is a logical continuation of D48958 `-fsanitize=implicit-integer-truncation`.
As for the ordering, i'we opted to emit the check **after**
`-fsanitize=implicit-integer-truncation`. At least on these simple 16 test cases,
this results in 1 of the 12 emitted checks being optimized away,
as compared to 0 checks being optimized away if the order is reversed.
This is a clang part.
The compiler-rt part is D50251.
Finishes fixing [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21530 | PR21530 ]], [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37552 | PR37552 ]], [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35409 | PR35409 ]].
Finishes partially fixing [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9821 | PR9821 ]].
Finishes fixing https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/940.
Only the bitfield handling is missing.
Reviewers: vsk, rsmith, rjmccall, #sanitizers, erichkeane
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: chandlerc, filcab, cfe-commits, regehr
Tags: #sanitizers, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50250
llvm-svn: 345660
nullptr_t does not access memory.
We now reuse CK_NullToPointer to represent a conversion from a glvalue
of type nullptr_t to a prvalue of nullptr_t where necessary.
llvm-svn: 345562
Summary:
- Added names for some emitted values (such as "tobool" for
the result of a cast to boolean).
- Replaced explicit IRBuilder request for doing sext/zext/trunc
by using CreateIntCast instead.
- Simplify code for emitting satuation into one if-statement
for clamping to max, and one if-statement for clamping to min.
Reviewers: leonardchan, ebevhan
Reviewed By: leonardchan
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53707
llvm-svn: 345398
This patch is a part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D48456 in an attempt to split
the casting logic up into smaller patches. This contains the code for casting
from fixed point types to boolean types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53308
llvm-svn: 345063
This patch is a part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D48456 in an attempt to
split them up. This contains the code for casting between fixed point types
and other fixed point types.
The method for converting between fixed point types is based off the convert()
method in APFixedPoint.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50616
llvm-svn: 344530
Summary:
As per IRC disscussion, it seems we really want to have more fine-grained `-fsanitize=implicit-integer-truncation`:
* A check when both of the types are unsigned.
* Another check for the other cases (either one of the types is signed, or both of the types is signed).
This is clang part.
Compiler-rt part is D50902.
Reviewers: rsmith, vsk, Sanitizers
Reviewed by: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50901
llvm-svn: 344230
Summary:
C and C++ are interesting languages. They are statically typed, but weakly.
The implicit conversions are allowed. This is nice, allows to write code
while balancing between getting drowned in everything being convertible,
and nothing being convertible. As usual, this comes with a price:
```
unsigned char store = 0;
bool consume(unsigned int val);
void test(unsigned long val) {
if (consume(val)) {
// the 'val' is `unsigned long`, but `consume()` takes `unsigned int`.
// If their bit widths are different on this platform, the implicit
// truncation happens. And if that `unsigned long` had a value bigger
// than UINT_MAX, then you may or may not have a bug.
// Similarly, integer addition happens on `int`s, so `store` will
// be promoted to an `int`, the sum calculated (0+768=768),
// and the result demoted to `unsigned char`, and stored to `store`.
// In this case, the `store` will still be 0. Again, not always intended.
store = store + 768; // before addition, 'store' was promoted to int.
}
// But yes, sometimes this is intentional.
// You can either make the conversion explicit
(void)consume((unsigned int)val);
// or mask the value so no bits will be *implicitly* lost.
(void)consume((~((unsigned int)0)) & val);
}
```
Yes, there is a `-Wconversion`` diagnostic group, but first, it is kinda
noisy, since it warns on everything (unlike sanitizers, warning on an
actual issues), and second, there are cases where it does **not** warn.
So a Sanitizer is needed. I don't have any motivational numbers, but i know
i had this kind of problem 10-20 times, and it was never easy to track down.
The logic to detect whether an truncation has happened is pretty simple
if you think about it - https://godbolt.org/g/NEzXbb - basically, just
extend (using the new, not original!, signedness) the 'truncated' value
back to it's original width, and equality-compare it with the original value.
The most non-trivial thing here is the logic to detect whether this
`ImplicitCastExpr` AST node is **actually** an implicit conversion, //or//
part of an explicit cast. Because the explicit casts are modeled as an outer
`ExplicitCastExpr` with some `ImplicitCastExpr`'s as **direct** children.
https://godbolt.org/g/eE1GkJ
Nowadays, we can just use the new `part_of_explicit_cast` flag, which is set
on all the implicitly-added `ImplicitCastExpr`'s of an `ExplicitCastExpr`.
So if that flag is **not** set, then it is an actual implicit conversion.
As you may have noted, this isn't just named `-fsanitize=implicit-integer-truncation`.
There are potentially some more implicit conversions to be warned about.
Namely, implicit conversions that result in sign change; implicit conversion
between different floating point types, or between fp and an integer,
when again, that conversion is lossy.
One thing i know isn't handled is bitfields.
This is a clang part.
The compiler-rt part is D48959.
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21530 | PR21530 ]], [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37552 | PR37552 ]], [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35409 | PR35409 ]].
Partially fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9821 | PR9821 ]].
Fixes https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/940. (other than sign-changing implicit conversions)
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, samsonov, pcc, vsk, eugenis, efriedma, kcc, erichkeane
Reviewed By: rsmith, vsk, erichkeane
Subscribers: erichkeane, klimek, #sanitizers, aaron.ballman, RKSimon, dtzWill, filcab, danielaustin, ygribov, dvyukov, milianw, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, regehr
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48958
llvm-svn: 338288
Summary:
Emmiting new intrinsic that strips invariant.groups to make
devirtulization sound, as described in RFC: Devirtualization v2.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, amharc, kuhar
Subscribers: llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47299
Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Pszeniczny <krzysztof.pszeniczny@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 336137
Summary:
This test is a strip down version of a function inside the
amalgamated sqlite source. When converted to IR clang produces
a phi instruction without debug location.
This patch fixes the above issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47720
llvm-svn: 335255
This diff includes the logic for setting the precision bits for each primary fixed point type in the target info and logic for initializing a fixed point literal.
Fixed point literals are declared using the suffixes
```
hr: short _Fract
uhr: unsigned short _Fract
r: _Fract
ur: unsigned _Fract
lr: long _Fract
ulr: unsigned long _Fract
hk: short _Accum
uhk: unsigned short _Accum
k: _Accum
uk: unsigned _Accum
```
Errors are also thrown for illegal literal values
```
unsigned short _Accum u_short_accum = 256.0uhk; // expected-error{{the integral part of this literal is too large for this unsigned _Accum type}}
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46915
llvm-svn: 335148
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
Summary:
Clean carriage returns from lib/ and include/. NFC.
(I have to make this change locally in order for `git diff` to show sane output after I edit a file, so I might as well ask for it to be committed. I don't have commit privs myself.)
(Without this patch, `git rebase`ing any change involving SemaDeclCXX.cpp is a real nightmare. :( So while I have no right to ask for this to be committed, geez would it make my workflow easier if it were.)
Here's the command I used to reformat things. (Requires bash and OSX/FreeBSD sed.)
git grep -l $'\r' lib include | xargs sed -i -e $'s/\r//'
find lib include -name '*-e' -delete
Reviewers: malcolm.parsons
Reviewed By: malcolm.parsons
Subscribers: emaste, krytarowski, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45591
Patch by Arthur O'Dwyer.
llvm-svn: 330112
source expressions when iterating over a PseudoObjectExpr's semantic
subexpression list.
Previously the loop in emitPseudoObjectExpr would emit the IR for each
OpaqueValueExpr that was in a PseudoObjectExpr's semantic-form
expression list and use the result when the OpaqueValueExpr later
appeared in other expressions. This caused an assertion failure when
AggExprEmitter tried to copy the result of an OpaqueValueExpr and the
copied type didn't have trivial copy/move constructors or assignment
operators.
This patch adds flag IsUnique to OpaqueValueExpr which indicates it is a
unique reference to its source expression (it is not used in multiple
places). The loop in emitPseudoObjectExpr ignores OpaqueValueExprs that
are unique and CodeGen visitors simply traverse the source expressions
of such OpaqueValueExprs.
rdar://problem/34363596
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39562
llvm-svn: 327939
Summary:
This patch enables debugging of C99 VLA types by generating more precise
LLVM Debug metadata, using the extended DISubrange 'count' field that
takes a DIVariable.
This should implement:
Bug 30553: Debug info generated for arrays is not what GDB expects (not as good as GCC's)
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30553
Reviewers: echristo, aprantl, dexonsmith, clayborg, pcc, kristof.beyls, dblaikie
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: jholewinski, schweitz, davide, fhahn, JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41698
llvm-svn: 323952
Adding the new enumerator forced a bunch more changes into this patch than I
would have liked. The -Wtautological-compare warning was extended to properly
check the new comparison operator, clang-format needed updating because it uses
precedence levels as weights for determining where to break lines (and several
operators increased their precedence levels with this change), thread-safety
analysis needed changes to build its own IL properly for the new operator.
All "real" semantic checking for this operator has been deferred to a future
patch. For now, we use the relational comparison rules and arbitrarily give
the builtin form of the operator a return type of 'void'.
llvm-svn: 320707
This commit fixes a bug in IRGen where it generates completely broken
code for __fp16 vectors on X86. For example when the following code is
compiled:
half4 hv0, hv1, hv2; // these are vectors of __fp16.
void foo221() {
hv0 = hv1 + hv2;
}
clang generates the following IR, in which two i16 vectors are added:
@hv1 = common global <4 x i16> zeroinitializer, align 8
@hv2 = common global <4 x i16> zeroinitializer, align 8
@hv0 = common global <4 x i16> zeroinitializer, align 8
define void @foo221() {
%0 = load <4 x i16>, <4 x i16>* @hv1, align 8
%1 = load <4 x i16>, <4 x i16>* @hv2, align 8
%add = add <4 x i16> %0, %1
store <4 x i16> %add, <4 x i16>* @hv0, align 8
ret void
}
To fix the bug, this commit uses the code committed in r314056, which
modified clang to promote and truncate __fp16 vectors to and from float
vectors in the AST. It also fixes another IRGen bug where a short value
is assigned to an __fp16 variable without any integer-to-floating-point
conversion, as shown in the following example:
__fp16 a;
short b;
void foo1() {
a = b;
}
@b = common global i16 0, align 2
@a = common global i16 0, align 2
define void @foo1() #0 {
%0 = load i16, i16* @b, align 2
store i16 %0, i16* @a, align 2
ret void
}
rdar://problem/20625184
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40112
llvm-svn: 320215
In function GetIntrinsic, not all types are covered. Types double and long long are missed, type long is wrongly treated same as int, it should be same as long long. These problems cause compiler crashes when compiling code in PR31161. This patch fixed the problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38820
llvm-svn: 316179
Usually compare expression should return i1 type, so EmitScalarConversion is called before return
return EmitScalarConversion(Result, CGF.getContext().BoolTy, E->getType(), E->getExprLoc());
But when ppc intrinsic is called to compare vectors, the ppc intrinsic can return i32 even E->getType() is BoolTy, in this case EmitScalarConversion does nothing, an i32 type result is returned and causes crash later.
This patch detects this case and truncates the result before return.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38656
llvm-svn: 315358
This commit fixes a bug in the handling of storage-only __fp16 vectors
where clang didn't promote __fp16 vector operands to float vectors.
Conceptually, it performs the following transformation on the AST in
CreateBuiltinBinOp and CreateBuiltinUnaryOp:
(Before)
typedef __fp16 half4 __attribute__ ((vector_size (8)));
typedef float float4 __attribute__ ((vector_size (16)));
half4 hv0, hv1, hv2, hv3;
hv0 = hv1 + hv2 + hv3;
(After)
float4 t0 = (float4)hv1 + (float4)hv2;
float4 t1 = t0 + (float4)hv3;
hv0 = (half4)t1;
Note that this commit fixes the bug for targets that set
HalfArgsAndReturns to true (ARM and ARM64). Targets using intrinsics
such as llvm.convert.to.fp16 to handle __fp16 are still broken.
rdar://problem/20625184
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32520
llvm-svn: 314056
This is a recommit of r312781; in some build configurations
variable names are omitted, so changed the new regression
test accordingly.
llvm-svn: 312794
This adds _Float16 as a source language type, which is a 16-bit floating point
type defined in C11 extension ISO/IEC TS 18661-3.
In follow up patches documentation and more tests will be added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33719
llvm-svn: 312781
expressions
C++ allows us to reference static variables through member expressions. Prior to
this commit, non-integer static variables that were referenced using a member
expression were always emitted using lvalue loads. The old behaviour introduced
an inconsistency between regular uses of static variables and member expressions
uses. For example, the following program compiled and linked successfully:
struct Foo {
constexpr static const char *name = "foo";
};
int main() {
return Foo::name[0] == 'f';
}
but this program failed to link because "Foo::name" wasn't found:
struct Foo {
constexpr static const char *name = "foo";
};
int main() {
Foo f;
return f.name[0] == 'f';
}
This commit ensures that constant static variables referenced through member
expressions are emitted in the same way as ordinary static variable references.
rdar://33942261
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36876
llvm-svn: 311772
The pointer overflow check gives false negatives when dealing with
expressions in which an unsigned value is subtracted from a pointer.
This is summarized in PR33430 [1]: ubsan permits the result of the
subtraction to be greater than "p", but it should not.
To fix the issue, we should track whether or not the pointer expression
is a subtraction. If it is, and the indices are unsigned, we know to
expect "p - <unsigned> <= p".
I've tested this by running check-{llvm,clang} with a stage2
ubsan-enabled build. I've also added some tests to compiler-rt, which
are in D34122.
[1] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33430
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34121
llvm-svn: 307955
Richard Trieu