Summary:
This seems like a more appropriate reaction to the user specifying a
single check with a wrong name, for example.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3981
llvm-svn: 210043
On win32, %s is expanded to X:\path\to\test\line-filter.cpp. It was incompatible to yaml.
Although "%/s" could be available in Lit, ClangTidyDiagnosticConsumer::passesLineFilter() is unaware of comparision between '/' and '\\'.
llvm-svn: 209569
Summary:
This is going to be used for a clang-tidy-diff script to display
warnings in changed lines only. The option uses JSON, as its value is not
intended to be entered manually.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3873
llvm-svn: 209450
Summary:
Make checks filtering more intuitive and easy to use. Remove
-disable-checks and change the format of -checks= to a comma-separated list of
globs with optional '-' prefix to denote exclusion. The -checks= option is now
cumulative, so it modifies defaults, not overrides them. Each glob adds or
removes to the current set of checks, so the filter can be refined or overriden
by adding globs.
Example:
The default value for -checks= is
'*,-clang-analyzer-alpha*,-llvm-include-order,-llvm-namespace-comment,-google-*',
which allows all checks except for the ones named clang-analyzer-alpha* and
others specified with the leading '-'. To allow all google-* checks one can
write:
clang-tidy -checks=google-* ...
If one needs only google-* checks, we first need to remove everything (-*):
clang-tidy -checks=-*,google-*
etc.
I'm not sure if we need to change something here, so I didn't touch the docs
yet.
Reviewers: klimek, alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3770
llvm-svn: 208883
Summary:
Also displays a hint to use -header-filter='.*' in case any warnings
are in non-user code. This will help discoverability of this option.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3621
llvm-svn: 208174
Summary:
Add clang-tidy -header-filter option to specify from which headers we
want diagnostics to be printed. By default we don't print diagnostics from
headers. We always print diagnostics from the main file of each translation
unit.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3590
llvm-svn: 207970
Summary:
These calls are part of the implementation of the smart pointer itself
and chaning it is likely to be wrong.
Example:
T& operator*() const { return *get(); }
Reviewers: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3540
llvm-svn: 207525
Summary:
Inject unique_ptr/shared_ptr into the test instead of using <memory>
Libraries might not be present on tests.
This fixes the break introduces at rL205854.
Reviewers: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3330
llvm-svn: 205913
Summary:
Extend the check to detect patterns like 'ptr.get() == nullptr'
It detects == and != when any argument is a ptr.get() and the other is a
nullptr.
Only supports standard smart pointer types std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr.
Does not support the case 'ptr.get() == other.get()' yet.
Reviewers: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3294
llvm-svn: 205854
Also make tests slightly less dependent on default flags. Once we have
implemented configuration file support, we might want to store the
clang-tidy configuration for the tests there.
llvm-svn: 205408
Summary:
This patch implements filtering of clang-tidy diagnostic messages by
the check name, so that "clang-tidy -checks=^llvm-" won't output any clang
warnings, for example. This is also helpful to run specific static-analyzer
checks: static analyzer always needs core checks to be enabled, but the user may
be interested only in the checks he asked for.
This patch also exposes warning option names for built-in diagnostics. We need
to have a namespace for these names to avoid collisions and to allow convenient
filtering, so I prefix them with "-W". I'm not sure it's the best thing to do,
and maybe "W" or "clang-diagnostic-" or something like this would be better.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3121
llvm-svn: 204321
This checks that parameters named in comments that appear before arguments in
function and constructor calls match the parameter name used in the callee's
declaration. For example:
void f(int x, int y);
void g() {
f(/*y=*/0, /*z=*/0);
}
contains two violations of the policy, as the names 'x' and 'y' used in the
declaration do not match names 'y' and 'z' used at the call site.
I think there is significant value in being able to check/enforce this policy
as a way of guarding against accidental API misuse and silent breakages
caused by API changes.
Although this pattern appears somewhat frequently in the LLVM codebase,
this policy is not prescribed by the LLVM coding standards at the moment,
so it lives under 'misc'.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2914
llvm-svn: 204113
Summary:
This is immediately useful for generating macro expansion notes, and
may be useful for other things later on.
Reviewers: klimek, djasper
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2950
llvm-svn: 203457
Summary: Peter, I guess, this can help you in testing your check.
Reviewers: djasper, pcc, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2989
llvm-svn: 203451
Summary:
Added a naive NOLINT implementation. It doesn't care about specific
linter categories, just the "// NOLINT" on the same line as a diagnostic.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2896
llvm-svn: 202452
Summary:
Pass check names all the way from ClangTidyModule through
ClangTidyCheck and ClangTidyContext to ClangTidyError, and output it in
handleErrors. This allows to find mis-behaving check and disable it easily.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2534
llvm-svn: 199094
This is implemented in a way that the current static analyzer
architecture allows, in the future we might want to revisit this.
With this change static analyzer checks are available from clang-tidy
by specifying -checks=clang-analyzer-<name>.
This change also fixes the use of the compilation database to allow
clang-tidy to be used like any other clang tool.
llvm-svn: 194707
This is the first version of a possible clang-tidy architecture. The
purpose of clang-tidy is to detect errors in adhering to common coding
patterns, e.g. described in the LLVM Coding Standards.
This is still heavily in flux.
Review: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D884
llvm-svn: 187345
Alexander Kornienko