Essentially takes the lld/Common/Threads.h wrappers and moves them to
the llvm/Support/Paralle.h algorithm header.
The changes are:
- Remove policy parameter, since all clients use `par`.
- Rename the methods to `parallelSort` etc to match LLVM style, since
they are no longer C++17 pstl compatible.
- Move algorithms from llvm::parallel:: to llvm::, since they have
"parallel" in the name and are no longer overloads of the regular
algorithms.
- Add range overloads
- Use the sequential algorithm directly when 1 thread is requested
(skips task grouping)
- Fix the index type of parallelForEachN to size_t. Nobody in LLVM was
using any other parameter, and it made overload resolution hard for
for_each_n(par, 0, foo.size(), ...) because 0 is int, not size_t.
Remove Threads.h and update LLD for that.
This is a prerequisite for parallel public symbol processing in the PDB
library, which is in LLVM.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, aganea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79390
This change is for those who use lld as a library. Context:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D70287
This patch adds a new parmeter to lld::*::link() so that we can pass
an raw_ostream object representing stdout. Previously, lld::*::link()
took only an stderr object.
Justification for making stdoutOS and stderrOS mandatory: I wanted to
make link() functions to take stdout and stderr in that order.
However, if we change the function signature from
bool link(ArrayRef<const char *> args, bool canExitEarly,
raw_ostream &stderrOS = llvm::errs());
to
bool link(ArrayRef<const char *> args, bool canExitEarly,
raw_ostream &stdoutOS = llvm::outs(),
raw_ostream &stderrOS = llvm::errs());
, then the meaning of existing code that passes stderrOS silently
changes (stderrOS would be interpreted as stdoutOS). So, I chose to
make existing code not to compile, so that developers can fix their
code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70292
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368936
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44977
llvm-svn: 332351
Pretty mechanical change here. Just replacing all the std::error_code() with
llvm::Error() and make_dynamic_error_code with make_error<GenericError>
llvm-svn: 264917
This is a re-commit of r264022 with a fix for MSVC. The issue there was
that the code was running DefinedAtom::~Atom() for some value and instead
needed to cast to Atom before running ~Atom. Original commit message follows.
Currently each File contains an BumpPtrAllocator in which Atom's are
allocated. Some Atom's contain data structures like std::vector which
leak as we don't run ~Atom when they are BumpPtrAllocate'd.
Now each File actually owns its Atom's using an OwningAtomPtr. This
is analygous to std::unique_ptr and may be replaced by it if possible.
An Atom can therefore only be owned by a single File, so the Resolver now
moves them from one File to another. The MachOLinkingContext owns the File's
and so clears all the Atom's in ~MachOLinkingContext, then delete's all the
File's. This makes sure all Atom's have been destructed before any of the
BumpPtrAllocator's in which they run have gone away.
Should hopefully fix the remaining leaks. Will keep an eye on the bots to
make sure.
llvm-svn: 264067
This reverts commit r264022.
This breaks the Window's bots which don't like that i'm calling ~Atom when
the this pointer is a sublcass of Atom.
Reverting for now until I try find a better fix. I tried using std::unique_ptr with
a custom deleter as a quick fix, but it didn't work well in the YAML parser.
llvm-svn: 264023
Currently each File contains an BumpPtrAllocator in which Atom's are
allocated. Some Atom's contain data structures like std::vector which
leak as we don't run ~Atom when they are BumpPtrAllocate'd.
Now each File actually owns its Atom's using an OwningAtomPtr. This
is analygous to std::unique_ptr and may be replaced by it if possible.
An Atom can therefore only be owned by a single File, so the Resolver now
moves them from one File to another. The MachOLinkingContext owns the File's
and so clears all the Atom's in ~MachOLinkingContext, then delete's all the
File's. This makes sure all Atom's have been destructed before any of the
BumpPtrAllocator's in which they run have gone away.
Should hopefully fix the remaining leaks. Will keep an eye on the bots to
make sure.
llvm-svn: 264022
We had some DEBUG prints these passes, but add more so that its clear where we are dumping
things, and what state we are in when we do so.
I'll be adding more and more DEBUG printing to try make it easier to observe whats going on
without having to attach a debugger.
llvm-svn: 255805
None of the implementations replace the SimpleFile with some other file,
they just modify the SimpleFile in-place, so a direct reference to the
file is sufficient.
llvm-svn: 240167
The real user of the LayoutPass is now only Mach-O, so move that
pass out of the common directory to Mach-O directory.
"Core" architecture were using the LayoutPass. I modified that
to use a simple OrderPass. I think no one actually have authority
what feature should be in Core and what's not, but I believe the
LayoutPass is not very suitable for Core. Before more code starts
depending on the complex pass, it's better to remove that from
Core.
I could have simplified that pass because Mach-O is the only user
of the LayoutPass. For example, the second parameter of the
LayoutPass constructor can be converted from optional to mandatory.
I didn't do that in this patch to keep it simple. I'll do in a
followup patch.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7311
llvm-svn: 228341
Reid Kleckner