Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Majnemer a53b5bbb18 [LoopStrengthReduce] Don't rewrite PHIs with incoming values from CatchSwitches
Bail out if we have a PHI on an EHPad that gets a value from a
CatchSwitchInst.  Because the CatchSwitchInst cannot be split, there is
no good place to stick any instructions.

This fixes PR26373.

llvm-svn: 259702
2016-02-03 21:30:34 +00:00
David Majnemer bbfc7219ef [IR] Remove terminatepad
It turns out that terminatepad gives little benefit over a cleanuppad
which calls the termination function.  This is not sufficient to
implement fully generic filters but MSVC doesn't support them which
makes terminatepad a little over-designed.

Depends on D15478.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15479

llvm-svn: 255522
2015-12-14 18:34:23 +00:00
David Majnemer 8a1c45d6e8 [IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR
While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on
top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies:
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design
  but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM
  experts.
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers.  They cannot
  be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes.
  This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation.
- catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward.
  It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other
  funclets.
- The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of
  control flow edges.  Because of this, we are forced to carefully
  analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal
  nesting among funclets.  While we have logic to clone funclets when
  they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a
  representation which forbade them upfront.

Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following:
- Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control
  flow, just a bunch of simple operands;  catchpad would be splittable.
- Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model
  the constraints of funclet oriented EH.
- Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume
  the token produced by the funclet which contains them.
- Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad.  Their presence can be inferred
  implicitly using coloring information.

N.B.  The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the
veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for.  An expert should take a
look to make sure the results are reasonable.

Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139

llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 05:38:55 +00:00
David Majnemer b222184223 [LoopStrengthReduce] Don't bother fixing up PHIs from EH Pad preds
We cannot really insert fixup code into a PHI's predecessor.

This fixes PR25445.

llvm-svn: 252416
2015-11-08 05:04:07 +00:00
David Majnemer 235acde953 [ScalarEvolutionExpander] PHI on a catchpad can be used on both edges
A PHI on a catchpad might be used by both edges out of the catchpad,
feeding back into a loop.  In this case, just use the insertion point.
Anything more clever would require new basic blocks or PHI placement.

llvm-svn: 251442
2015-10-27 19:48:28 +00:00
David Majnemer dd9a815746 [ScalarEvolutionExpander] Properly insert no-op casts + EH Pads
We want to insert no-op casts as close as possible to the def.  This is
tricky when the cast is of a PHI node and the BasicBlocks between the
def and the use cannot hold any instructions.  Iteratively walk EH pads
until we hit a non-EH pad.

This fixes PR25326.

llvm-svn: 251393
2015-10-27 07:36:42 +00:00