to pass around a struct instead of a large set of individual values. This
cleans up the interface and allows more information to be added to the struct
for future targets without requiring changes to each and every target.
NV_CONTRIB
llvm-svn: 157479
test suite failures. The failures occur at each stage, and only get
worse, so I'm reverting all of them.
Please resubmit these patches, one at a time, after verifying that the
regression test suite passes. Never submit a patch without running the
regression test suite.
llvm-svn: 155372
commits have had several major issues pointed out in review, and those
issues are not being addressed in a timely fashion. Furthermore, this
was all committed leading up to the v3.1 branch, and we don't need piles
of code with outstanding issues in the branch.
It is possible that not all of these commits were necessary to revert to
get us back to a green state, but I'm going to let the Hexagon
maintainer sort that out. They can recommit, in order, after addressing
the feedback.
Reverted commits, with some notes:
Primary commit r154616: HexagonPacketizer
- There are lots of review comments here. This is the primary reason
for reverting. In particular, it introduced large amount of warnings
due to a bad construct in tablegen.
- Follow-up commits that should be folded back into this when
reposting:
- r154622: CMake fixes
- r154660: Fix numerous build warnings in release builds.
- Please don't resubmit this until the three commits above are
included, and the issues in review addressed.
Primary commit r154695: Pass to replace transfer/copy ...
- Reverted to minimize merge conflicts. I'm not aware of specific
issues with this patch.
Primary commit r154703: New Value Jump.
- Primarily reverted due to merge conflicts.
- Follow-up commits that should be folded back into this when
reposting:
- r154703: Remove iostream usage
- r154758: Fix CMake builds
- r154759: Fix build warnings in release builds
- Please incorporate these fixes and and review feedback before
resubmitting.
Primary commit r154829: Hexagon V5 (floating point) support.
- Primarily reverted due to merge conflicts.
- Follow-up commits that should be folded back into this when
reposting:
- r154841: Remove unused variable (fixing build warnings)
There are also accompanying Clang commits that will be reverted for
consistency.
llvm-svn: 155047
the processor keeps a return addresses stack (RAS) which stores the address
and the instruction execution state of the instruction after a function-call
type branch instruction.
Calling a "noreturn" function with normal call instructions (e.g. bl) can
corrupt RAS and causes 100% return misprediction so LLVM should use a
unconditional branch instead. i.e.
mov lr, pc
b _foo
The "mov lr, pc" is issued in order to get proper backtrace.
rdar://8979299
llvm-svn: 151623
This new scheduler plugs into the existing selection DAG scheduling framework. It is a top-down critical path scheduler that tracks register pressure and uses a DFA for pipeline modeling.
Patch by Sergei Larin!
llvm-svn: 149547
undefined result. This adds new ISD nodes for the new semantics,
selecting them when the LLVM intrinsic indicates that the undef behavior
is desired. The new nodes expand trivially to the old nodes, so targets
don't actually need to do anything to support these new nodes besides
indicating that they should be expanded. I've done this for all the
operand types that I could figure out for all the targets. Owners of
various targets, please review and let me know if any of these are
incorrect.
Note that the expand behavior is *conservatively correct*, and exactly
matches LLVM's current behavior with these operations. Ideally this
patch will not change behavior in any way. For example the regtest suite
finds the exact same instruction sequences coming out of the code
generator. That's why there are no new tests here -- all of this is
being exercised by the existing test suite.
Thanks to Duncan Sands for reviewing the various bits of this patch and
helping me get the wrinkles ironed out with expanding for each target.
Also thanks to Chris for clarifying through all the discussions that
this is indeed the approach he was looking for. That said, there are
likely still rough spots. Further review much appreciated.
llvm-svn: 146466
Benjamin Kramer