The code sequence before the spiller is something like:
= tMOVrr
%reg1117 = tMOVrr
%reg1078 = tLSLri %reg1117, 2
The it starts spilling:
%r0 = tRestore <fi#5>, 0
%r1 = tRestore <fi#7>, 0
%r1 = tMOVrr %r1<kill>
tSpill %r1, <fi#5>, 0
%reg1078 = tLSLri %reg1117, 2
It restores the value while processing the first tMOVrr. At this point, the
spiller remembers fi#5 is available in %r0. Next it processes the second move.
It restores the source before the move and spills the result afterwards. The
move becomes a noop and is deleted. However, a spill has been inserted and that
should invalidate reuse of %r0 for fi#5 and add reuse of %r1 for fi#5.
Therefore, %reg1117 (which is also assigned fi#5) should get %r1, not %r0.
llvm-svn: 34039
t1 := op t2, t3
t2 <- assigned r0 for use by the reload but ended up reuse r1
t3 <- assigned r1 for use by the reload but ended up reuse r0
t1 <- desires r1
sees r1 is taken by t2, tries t2's reload register r0
sees r0 is taken by t3, tries t3's reload register r1
sees r1 is taken by t2, tries t2's reload register r0 ...
llvm-svn: 33382
rework the hacks that had us passing OStream in. We pass in std::ostream*
instead, check for null, and then dispatch to the correct print() method.
llvm-svn: 32636
If a spillslot value is available in a register, and there is a noop copy that
targets that register, the spiller correctly decide not to invalidate the
spillslot register.
However, even though the noop copy does not clobbers the value. It does start a
new intersecting live range. That means the spillslot register is available for
use but should not be reused for a two-address instruction modref operand which
would clobber the new live range.
When we remove the noop copy, update the available information by clearing the
canClobber bit.
llvm-svn: 32576
tied to another oeprand, 2) whether is is being tied to by another operand. So
the destination operand of a two-address MI can be correctly identified.
llvm-svn: 32354
there may be other def(s) apart from the use&def two-address operand. We need
to check if the register reuse for a use&def operand may conflicts with another
def. Provide a mean to recover from the conflict if it is detected when the
defs are processed later.
llvm-svn: 31439
actually *removes* one of the operands, instead of just assigning both operands
the same register. This make reasoning about instructions unnecessarily complex,
because you need to know if you are before or after register allocation to match
up operand #'s with the target description file.
Changing this also gets rid of a bunch of hacky code in various places.
This patch also includes changes to fold loads into cmp/test instructions in
the X86 backend, along with a significant simplification to the X86 spill
folding code.
llvm-svn: 30108
instructions which define each value#) to simplify and improve the coallescer.
In particular, this patch:
1. Implements iterative coallescing.
2. Reverts an unsafe hack from handlePhysRegDef, superceeding it with a
better solution.
3. Implements PR865, "coallescing" away the second copy in code like:
A = B
...
B = A
This also includes changes to symbolically print registers in intervals
when possible.
llvm-svn: 29862
instructions in the virtregfolded map that were deleted. Because they
were deleted, newly allocated instructions could end up at the same address,
magically finding themselves in the map. The solution is to remove entries
from the map when we delete the instructions.
llvm-svn: 28041
Evan Cheng