The alias support was dead code since 2011. It was last touched
in r124182, where it was reintroduced after being removed
in r110434, and since then it was gated behind a HasGlobalAliases
flag that was permanently stuck as `false`.
It is also broken. I'm not sure if it bitrotted or was just broken
in the first place because it appears to have never been tested,
but the following IR results in a crash:
define internal i32 @a(i32 %a, i32 %b) unnamed_addr {
%c = add i32 %a, %b
%d = xor i32 %a, %c
ret i32 %c
}
define internal i32 @b(i32 %a, i32 %b) unnamed_addr {
%c = add i32 %a, %b
%d = xor i32 %a, %c
ret i32 %c
}
It seems safe to remove buggy untested code that no one cared about
for seven years.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34802
llvm-svn: 309313
Commits were:
"Use WeakVH instead of WeakTrackingVH in AliasSetTracker's UnkownInsts"
"Add a new WeakVH value handle; NFC"
"Rename WeakVH to WeakTrackingVH; NFC"
The changes assumed pointers are 8 byte aligned on all architectures.
llvm-svn: 301429
Summary:
I plan to use WeakVH to mean "nulls itself out on deletion, but does
not track RAUW" in a subsequent commit.
Reviewers: dblaikie, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: arsenm, mehdi_amini, mcrosier, mzolotukhin, jfb, llvm-commits, nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32266
llvm-svn: 301424
Add hasParamAttribute() and use it instead of hasAttribute(ArgNo+1,
Kind) everywhere.
The fact that the AttributeList index for an argument is ArgNo+1 should
be a hidden implementation detail.
NFC
llvm-svn: 300272
Summary:
For now, it just wraps AttributeSetNode*. Eventually, it will hold
AvailableAttrs as an inline bitset, and adding and removing enum
attributes will be super cheap.
This sinks AttributeSetNode back down to lib/IR/AttributeImpl.h.
Reviewers: pete, chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits, jfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31940
llvm-svn: 300014
This re-lands r299875.
I introduced a bug in Clang code responsible for replacing K&R, no
prototype declarations with a real function definition with a prototype.
The bug was here:
// Collect any return attributes from the call.
- if (oldAttrs.hasAttributes(llvm::AttributeList::ReturnIndex))
- newAttrs.push_back(llvm::AttributeList::get(newFn->getContext(),
- oldAttrs.getRetAttributes()));
+ newAttrs.push_back(oldAttrs.getRetAttributes());
Previously getRetAttributes() carried AttributeList::ReturnIndex in its
AttributeList. Now that we return the AttributeSetNode* directly, it no
longer carries that index, and we call this overload with a single node:
AttributeList::get(LLVMContext&, ArrayRef<AttributeSetNode*>)
That aborted with an assertion on x86_32 targets. I added an explicit
triple to the test and added CHECKs to help find issues like this in the
future sooner.
llvm-svn: 299899
Summary:
AttributeList::get(Fn|Ret|Param)Attributes no longer creates a temporary
AttributeList just to hide the AttributeSetNode type.
I've also added a factory method to create AttributeLists from a
parallel array of AttributeSetNodes. I think this simplifies
construction of AttributeLists when rewriting function prototypes.
Previously we would test if a particular index had attributes, and
conditionally add a temporary attribute list to a vector. Now the
attribute set vector is parallel to the argument vector already that
these passes already construct.
My long term vision is to wrap AttributeSetNode* inside an AttributeSet
type that holds the enum attributes, but that will come in a follow up
change.
I haven't done any performance measurements for this change because
profiling hasn't shown that any of the affected code is hot.
Reviewers: pete, chandlerc, sanjoy, hfinkel
Reviewed By: pete
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31198
llvm-svn: 299875
Summary:
This class is a list of AttributeSetNodes corresponding the function
prototype of a call or function declaration. This class used to be
called ParamAttrListPtr, then AttrListPtr, then AttributeSet. It is
typically accessed by parameter and return value index, so
"AttributeList" seems like a more intuitive name.
Rename AttributeSetImpl to AttributeListImpl to follow suit.
It's useful to rename this class so that we can rename AttributeSetNode
to AttributeSet later. AttributeSet is the set of attributes that apply
to a single function, argument, or return value.
Reviewers: sanjoy, javed.absar, chandlerc, pete
Reviewed By: pete
Subscribers: pete, jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, mehdi_amini, jfb, nhaehnle, sbc100, void, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31102
llvm-svn: 298393
Summary:
Under option -mergefunc-preserve-debug-info we:
- Do not create a new function for a thunk.
- Retain the debug info for a thunk's parameters (and associated
instructions for the debug info) from the entry block.
Note: -debug will display the algorithm at work.
- Create debug-info for the call (to the shared implementation) made by
a thunk and its return value.
- Erase the rest of the function, retaining the (minimally sized) entry
block to create a thunk.
- Preserve a thunk's call site to point to the thunk even when both occur
within the same translation unit, to aid debugability. Note that this
behaviour differs from the underlying -mergefunc implementation which
modifies the thunk's call site to point to the shared implementation
when both occur within the same translation unit.
Reviewers: echristo, eeckstein, dblaikie, aprantl, friss
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: davide, fhahn, jfb, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28075
llvm-svn: 292702
This is pure refactoring. NFC.
This change moves the FunctionComparator (together with the GlobalNumberState
utility) in to a separate file so that it can be used by other passes.
For example, the SwiftMergeFunctions pass in the Swift compiler:
https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/master/lib/LLVMPasses/LLVMMergeFunctions.cpp
Details of the change:
*) The big part is just moving code out of MergeFunctions.cpp into FunctionComparator.h/cpp
*) Make FunctionComparator member functions protected (instead of private)
so that a derived comparator class can use them.
Following refactoring helps to share code between the base FunctionComparator
class and a derived class:
*) Add a beginCompare() function
*) Move some basic function property comparisons into a separate function compareSignature()
*) Do the GEP comparison inside cmpOperations() which now has a new
needToCmpOperands reference parameter
https://reviews.llvm.org/D25385
llvm-svn: 286632
If a local_unnamed_addr attribute is attached to a global, the address
is known to be insignificant within the module. It is distinct from the
existing unnamed_addr attribute in that it only describes a local property
of the module rather than a global property of the symbol.
This attribute is intended to be used by the code generator and LTO to allow
the linker to decide whether the global needs to be in the symbol table. It is
possible to exclude a global from the symbol table if three things are true:
- This attribute is present on every instance of the global (which means that
the normal rule that the global must have a unique address can be broken without
being observable by the program by performing comparisons against the global's
address)
- The global has linkonce_odr linkage (which means that each linkage unit must have
its own copy of the global if it requires one, and the copy in each linkage unit
must be the same)
- It is a constant or a function (which means that the program cannot observe that
the unique-address rule has been broken by writing to the global)
Although this attribute could in principle be computed from the module
contents, LTO clients (i.e. linkers) will normally need to be able to compute
this property as part of symbol resolution, and it would be inefficient to
materialize every module just to compute it.
See:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160509/356401.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160516/356738.html
for earlier discussion.
Part of the fix for PR27553.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20348
llvm-svn: 272709
The assumption, made in insert() that weak functions are always inserted after strong functions,
is only true in the first round of adding functions.
In subsequent rounds this is no longer guaranteed , because we might remove a strong function from the tree (because it's modified) and add it later,
where an equivalent weak function already exists in the tree.
This change removes the assert in insert() and explicitly enforces a weak->strong order.
This also removes the need of two separate loops in runOnModule().
llvm-svn: 271299
Check that the incoming blocks of phi nodes are identical, and block
function merging if they are not.
rdar://problem/26255167
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20462
llvm-svn: 270250
The original commit was reverted because of a buildbot problem with LazyCallGraph::SCC handling (not related to the OptBisect handling).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19172
llvm-svn: 267231
This patch implements a optimization bisect feature, which will allow optimizations to be selectively disabled at compile time in order to track down test failures that are caused by incorrect optimizations.
The bisection is enabled using a new command line option (-opt-bisect-limit). Individual passes that may be skipped call the OptBisect object (via an LLVMContext) to see if they should be skipped based on the bisect limit. A finer level of control (disabling individual transformations) can be managed through an addition OptBisect method, but this is not yet used.
The skip checking in this implementation is based on (and replaces) the skipOptnoneFunction check. Where that check was being called, a new call has been inserted in its place which checks the bisect limit and the optnone attribute. A new function call has been added for module and SCC passes that behaves in a similar way.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19172
llvm-svn: 267022
Removed some unused headers, replaced some headers with forward class declarations.
Found using simple scripts like this one:
clear && ack --cpp -l '#include "llvm/ADT/IndexedMap.h"' | xargs grep -L 'IndexedMap[<]' | xargs grep -n --color=auto 'IndexedMap'
Patch by Eugene Kosov <claprix@yandex.ru>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19219
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266595
r237193 fix handling of alloca size / align in MergeFunctions, but only tested one and didn't follow FunctionComparator::cmpOperations's usual comparison pattern. It also didn't update Instruction.cpp:haveSameSpecialState which I'll do separately.
llvm-svn: 266022
Summary:
Fixes PR26774.
If you're aware of the issue, feel free to skip the "Motivation"
section and jump directly to "This patch".
Motivation:
I define "refinement" as discarding behaviors from a program that the
optimizer has license to discard. So transforming:
```
void f(unsigned x) {
unsigned t = 5 / x;
(void)t;
}
```
to
```
void f(unsigned x) { }
```
is refinement, since the behavior went from "if x == 0 then undefined
else nothing" to "nothing" (the optimizer has license to discard
undefined behavior).
Refinement is a fundamental aspect of many mid-level optimizations done
by LLVM. For instance, transforming `x == (x + 1)` to `false` also
involves refinement since the expression's value went from "if x is
`undef` then { `true` or `false` } else { `false` }" to "`false`" (by
definition, the optimizer has license to fold `undef` to any non-`undef`
value).
Unfortunately, refinement implies that the optimizer cannot assume
that the implementation of a function it can see has all of the
behavior an unoptimized or a differently optimized version of the same
function can have. This is a problem for functions with comdat
linkage, where a function can be replaced by an unoptimized or a
differently optimized version of the same source level function.
For instance, FunctionAttrs cannot assume a comdat function is
actually `readnone` even if it does not have any loads or stores in
it; since there may have been loads and stores in the "original
function" that were refined out in the currently visible variant, and
at the link step the linker may in fact choose an implementation with
a load or a store. As an example, consider a function that does two
atomic loads from the same memory location, and writes to memory only
if the two values are not equal. The optimizer is allowed to refine
this function by first CSE'ing the two loads, and the folding the
comparision to always report that the two values are equal. Such a
refined variant will look like it is `readonly`. However, the
unoptimized version of the function can still write to memory (since
the two loads //can// result in different values), and selecting the
unoptimized version at link time will retroactively invalidate
transforms we may have done under the assumption that the function
does not write to memory.
Note: this is not just a problem with atomics or with linking
differently optimized object files. See PR26774 for more realistic
examples that involved neither.
This patch:
This change introduces a new set of linkage types, predicated as
`GlobalValue::mayBeDerefined` that returns true if the linkage type
allows a function to be replaced by a differently optimized variant at
link time. It then changes a set of IPO passes to bail out if they see
such a function.
Reviewers: chandlerc, hfinkel, dexonsmith, joker.eph, rnk
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18634
llvm-svn: 265762
Summary:
In the context of http://wg21.link/lwg2445 C++ uses the concept of
'stronger' ordering but doesn't define it properly. This should be fixed
in C++17 barring a small question that's still open.
The code currently plays fast and loose with the AtomicOrdering
enum. Using an enum class is one step towards tightening things. I later
also want to tighten related enums, such as clang's
AtomicOrderingKind (which should be shared with LLVM as a 'C++ ABI'
enum).
This change touches a few lines of code which can be improved later, I'd
like to keep it as NFC for now as it's already quite complex. I have
related changes for clang.
As a follow-up I'll add:
bool operator<(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator<=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
This is separate so that clang and LLVM changes don't need to be in sync.
Reviewers: jyknight, reames
Subscribers: jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18775
llvm-svn: 265602
commit ae14bf6488e8441f0f6d74f00455555f6f3943ac
Author: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
Date: Fri Mar 11 17:15:50 2016 +0000
Remove PreserveNames template parameter from IRBuilder
Summary:
Following r263086, we are now relying on a flag on the Context to
discard Value names in release builds.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18023
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263258
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
until we can figure out what to do about clang and Release build testing.
This reverts commit 263258.
llvm-svn: 263321
Summary:
Following r263086, we are now relying on a flag on the Context to
discard Value names in release builds.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18023
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 263258
When working with tokens, it is often the case that one has instructions
which consume a token and produce a new token. Currently, we have no
mechanism to represent an initial token state.
Instead, we can create a notional "empty token" by inventing a new
constant which captures the semantics we would like. This new constant
is called ConstantTokenNone and is written textually as "token none".
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14581
llvm-svn: 252811
Otherwise, the map will observe changes as long as MergeFunctions is alive. This
is bad because follow-up passes could replace-all-uses-with on the key of an
entry in the map. The value handle callback of ValueMap however asserts that the
key type matches.
rdar://22971893
llvm-svn: 249327
This was a flawed change - it just caused the getElementType call to be
deferred until later, when we really need to remove it. Now that the IR
for GlobalAliases has been updated, the root cause is addressed that way
instead and this change is no longer needed (and in fact gets in the way
- because we want to pass the pointee type directly down further).
Follow up patches to push this through GlobalValue, bitcode format, etc,
will come along soon.
This reverts commit 236160.
llvm-svn: 247585
GetElementPointers must have the first argument's type compared
for structural equivalence. Previously the code erroneously compared the
pointer's type, but this code was dead because all pointer types (of the
same address space) are the same. The pointee must be compared instead
(using the type stored in the GEP, not from the pointer type which will
be erased anyway).
Author: jrkoenig
Reviewers: dschuff, nlewycky, jfb
Subscribers: nlewycky, llvm-commits
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12820
llvm-svn: 247570
This change correctly sets the attributes on the callsites
generated in thunks. This makes sure things such as sret, sext, etc.
are correctly set, so that the call can be a proper tailcall.
Also, the transfer of attributes in the replaceDirectCallers function
appears to be unnecessary, but until this is confirmed it will remain.
Author: jrkoenig
Reviewers: dschuff, jfb
Subscribers: llvm-commits, nlewycky
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12581
llvm-svn: 247313
Summary:
This patch introduces a side table in Merge Functions to
efficiently remove functions from the function set when functions
they refer to are merged. Previously these functions would need to
be compared lg(N) times to find the appropriate FunctionNode in the
tree to defer. With the recent determinism changes, this comparison
is more expensive. In addition, the removal function would not always
actually remove the function from the set (i.e. after remove(F),
there would sometimes still be a node in the tree which contains F).
With these changes, these functions are properly deferred, and so more
functions can be merged. In addition, when there are many merged
functions (and thus more deferred functions), there is a speedup:
chromium: 48678 merged -> 49380 merged; 6.58s -> 5.49s
libxul.so: 41004 merged -> 41030 merged; 8.02s -> 6.94s
mysqld: 1607 merged -> 1607 merged (same); 0.215s -> 0.212s (probably noise)
Author: jrkoenig
Reviewers: jfb, dschuff
Subscribers: llvm-commits, nlewycky
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12537
llvm-svn: 246735
Summary:
This patch removes two remaining places where pointer value comparisons
are used to order functions: comparing range annotation metadata, and comparing
block address constants. (These are both rare cases, and so no actual
non-determinism was observed from either case).
The fix for range metadata is simple: the annotation always consists of a pair
of integers, so we just order by those integers.
The fix for block addresses is more subtle. Two constants are the same if they
are the same basic block in the same function, or if they refer to corresponding
basic blocks in each respective function. Note that in the first case, merging
is trivially correct. In the second, the correctness of merging relies on the
fact that the the values of block addresses cannot be compared. This change is
actually an enhancement, as these functions could not previously be merged (see
merge-block-address.ll).
There is still a problem with cross function block addresses, in that constants
pointing to a basic block in a merged function is not updated.
This also more robustly compares floating point constants by all fields of their
semantics, and fixes a dyn_cast/cast mixup.
Author: jrkoenig
Reviewers: dschuff, nlewycky, jfb
Subscribers llvm-commits
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12376
llvm-svn: 246305
Summary: When comparing basic blocks, there is an additional check that two Value*'s should have the same ID, which interferes with merging equivalent constants of different kinds (such as a ConstantInt and a ConstantPointerNull in the included testcase). The cmpValues function already ensures that the two values in each function are the same, so removing this check should not cause incorrect merging.
Also, the type comparison is redundant, based on reviewing the code and testing on the test suite and several large LTO bitcodes.
Author: jrkoenig
Reviewers: nlewycky, jfb, dschuff
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12302
llvm-svn: 246001
Summary:
Merge functions previously relied on unsigned comparisons of pointer values to
order functions. This caused observable non-determinism in the compiler for
large bitcode programs. Basically, opt -mergefuncs program.bc | md5sum produces
different hashes when run repeatedly on the same machine. Differing output was
observed on three large bitcodes, but it was less frequent on the smallest file.
It is possible that this only manifests on the large inputs, hence remaining
undetected until now.
This patch fixes this by removing (almost, see below) all places where
comparisons between pointers are used to order functions. Most of these changes
are local, but the comparison of global values requires assigning an identifier
to each local in the order it is visited. This is very similar to the way the
comparison function identifies Value*'s defined within a function. Because the
order of visiting the functions and their subparts is deterministic, the
identifiers assigned to the globals will be as well, and the order of functions
will be deterministic.
With these changes, there is no more observed non-determinism. There is also
only minor slowdowns (negligible to 4%) compared to the baseline, which is
likely a result of the fact that global comparisons involve hash lookups and not
just pointer comparisons.
The one caveat so far is that programs containing BlockAddress constants can
still be non-deterministic. It is not clear what the right solution is here. In
particular, even if the global numbers are used to order by function, we still
need a way to order the BasicBlock*'s. Unfortunately, we cannot just bail out
and fail to order the functions or consider them equal, because we require a
total order over functions. Note that programs with BlockAddress constants are
relatively rare, so the impact of leaving this in is minor as long as this pass
is opt-in.
Author: jrkoenig
Reviewers: nlewycky, jfb, dschuff
Subscribers: jevinskie, llvm-commits, chapuni
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12168
llvm-svn: 245762
whitequark