The existing tests for transform_view::iterator weren't quite right,
and can be simplified now that we have more of C++20 available to us.
Having done that, let's use the same pattern for iota_view::iterator
as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110774
Instead of using a base class to store the members and the optional
size, use [[no_unique_address]] to achieve the same thing without
needing a base class.
Also, as a fly-by:
- Change subrange from struct to class (per the standard)
- Improve the diagnostic for when one doesn't provide a size to the ctor of a sized subrange
- Replace this->member by just member since it's not in a dependent base anymore
This change would be an ABI break due to [[no_unique_address]], but we
haven't shipped ranges anywhere yet, so this shouldn't affect anyone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110370
These are specced as `inline constexpr auto`; the extra `const`
isn't doing anything except being inconsistent with the other CPOs.
Now all the implemented CPOs can be detected by
git grep 'inline constexpr auto.*fn' ../libcxx/include/
and I think that's beautiful.
Those constructors are very easy to misuse -- one could easily think that
the size passed to the constructor is the size of the range to exhibit
from the subrange. Instead, it's a size hint and it's UB to get it wrong.
Hence, when it's cheap to compute the real size of the range, it's cheap
to make sure that the user didn't get it wrong.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108827
We don't use double underscores for private header names when they are
in a subdirectory with double underscores already.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108820
This patch implements the underlying mechanism for range adaptors. It
does so based on http://wg21.link/p2387, even though that paper hasn't
been adopted yet. In the future, if p2387 is adopted, it would suffice
to rename `__bind_back` to `std::bind_back` and `__range_adaptor_closure`
to `std::range_adaptor_closure` to implement that paper by the spec.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107098
The `get` half of this machinery was already implemented, but the `tuple_size`
and `tuple_element` parts were hiding in [ranges.syn] and therefore missed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108054
As explained in http://eel.is/c++draft/range.nonprop.cache#note-1, we
should allow copy and move elision to happen when calling emplace_deref
in non-propagating-cache. Before this change, the only way to emplace
into the non-propagating-cache was to call `__set(*it)`, which materialized
`*it` when binding it to the reference argument of `__set` and disabled
move elision.
As a fly-by change, this also renames `__set` to `__emplace` for consistency
and adds tests for it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107932
We've been forgetting to add those to most of the <ranges> review.
To avoid forgetting in the future, I added an item in the pre-commit
checklist.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106287
* <__algorithm/iter_swap.h>
* <__algorithm/swap_ranges.h>
* <__functional/is_transparent.h>
* <__memory/uses_allocator.h>
* <__ranges/drop_view.h>
* <__ranges/transform_view.h>
* <shared_mutex>
* <span>
Also updates header inclusions that were affected.
**NOTE:** This is a proper subset of D105932. Since the content has
already been LGTM'd, I intend to merge this patch without review,
pending green CI. I decided it would be better to move these changes
into their own commit since the former patch has undergone further
changes and will need yet another light review. In the event any of
that gets rolled back (for whatever reason), the changes in this patch
won't be affected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106040
Moves:
* `std::move`, `std::forward`, `std::declval`, and `std::swap` into
`__utility/${FUNCTION_NAME}`.
* `std::swap_ranges` and `std::iter_swap` into
`__algorithm/${FUNCTION_NAME}`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103734
A few slipped through the cracks because D104175 and D104170 didn't
concern themselves with newer commits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104414
This has been broken out of D104170 since it should be merged whether or
not we go ahead with the module map changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104175
Arthur O'Dwyer