Try to be more consistent with the SDLoc param in the TargetLowering methods.
This also exposes an issue where we were passing a SDNode as a SDLoc, relying on the implicit SDLoc(SDNode) constructor.
Just the obvious implementation that rewrites the result type. Also fix
warning from EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR legalization that triggers on the test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84706
This fixes an assertion failure that was being triggered in
SelectionDAG::getZeroExtendInReg(), where it was trying to extend the <2xi32>
to i64 (which should have been <2xi64>).
Fixes: rdar://66016901
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84884
This change is mechanical, it just removes the restriction and updates tests. The key building blocks were submitted in 31342eb and 8fe2abc.
Note that this (and preceeding changes) entirely subsumes D83965. I did includes a couple of it's tests.
From the codegen changes, an interesting observation: this doesn't actual reduce spilling, it just let's the register allocator do it's job. That results in a slightly different overall result which has both pros and cons over the eager spill lowering. (i.e. We'll have some perf tuning to do once this is stable.)
Change the way we track how a particular pointer was relocated at a statepoint in selection dag. Previously, we used an optional<location> for the spill lowering, and a block local Register for the newly introduced vreg lowering. Combine all three lowerings (norelocate, spill, and vreg) into a single helper class, and keep a single copy of the information.
This is submitted separately as it really does make the code more readible on it's own, but the indirect motivation is to move vreg tracking from StatepointLowering to FunctionLoweringInfo. This is the last piece needed to support cross block relocations with vregs; that will follow in a separate (non-NFC) patch.
This builds on 3da1a96 on the path towards supporting invokes and cross block relocations. The actual change attempts to be NFC, but does fail in one corner-case explained below.
The change itself is fairly mechanical. Rather than remember SDValues - which are inherently block local - immediately produce a virtual register copy and remember that.
Once this lands, we'll update the FunctionLoweringInfo::StatepointSpillMap map to allow register based lowerings, delete VirtRegs from StatepointLowering, and drop the restriction against cross block relocations. I deliberately separate the semantic part into it's own change for easy of understanding and fault isolation.
The corner-case which isn't quite NFC is that the old implementation implicitly CSEd gc.relocates of the same SDValue regardless of type. The new implementation still only relocates once, but it produces distinct vregs for the bitcast and it's source, whereas SelectionDAG's generic CSE was able to remove the bitcast in the old implementation. Note that the final assembly doesn't change (at least in the test), as our MI level optimizations catch the duplication.
I assert that this is an uninteresting corner-case. It's functionally correct, and if we find a case where this influences performance, we should really be canonicalizing types to i8* at the IR level.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84692
I have added tests to:
CodeGen/AArch64/sve-intrinsics-int-arith.ll
for doing simple integer add operations on tuple types. Since these
tests introduced new warnings due to incorrect use of
getVectorNumElements() I have also fixed up these warnings in the
same patch. These fixes are:
1. In narrowExtractedVectorBinOp I have changed the code to bail out
early for scalable vector types, since we've not yet hit a case that
proves the optimisations are profitable for scalable vectors.
2. In DAGTypeLegalizer::WidenVecRes_CONCAT_VECTORS I have replaced
calls to getVectorNumElements with getVectorMinNumElements in cases
that work with scalable vectors. For the other cases I have added
asserts that the vector is not scalable because we should not be
using shuffle vectors and build vectors in such cases.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84016
In DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecOp_EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR I have replaced
calls to getVectorNumElements with getVectorMinNumElements, since
this code path works for both fixed and scalable vector types. For
scalable vectors the index will be multiplied by VSCALE.
Fixes warnings in this test:
sve-sext-zext.ll
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83198
Summary:
In parallelizeChainedStores, a TokenFactor was created with the size greater than 3000.
We found that DAGCombiner::visitTokenFactor will consume a huge amount of time on
such nodes. Since the number of operands already exceeds TokenFactorInlineLimit, we propose
to give up simplification with the consideration of compile time.
Reviewers:
@spatel, @arsenm
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D84204
(Disabled under flag for the moment)
This is part of a larger project wherein we are finally integrating lowering of gc live operands with the register allocator. Today, we force spill all operands in SelectionDAG. The code to do so is distinctly non-optimal. The approach this patch is working towards is to instead lower the relocations directly into the MI form, and let the register allocator pick which ones get spilled and which stack slots they get spilled to. In terms of performance, the later part is actually more important as it avoids redundant shuffling of values between stack slots.
This particular change adds ISEL support to produce the variadic def STATEPOINT form required by the above. In particular, the first N are lowered to variadic tied def/use pairs. So new statepoint looks like this:
reloc1,reloc2,... = STATEPOINT ..., base1, derived1<tied-def0>, base2, derived2<tied-def1>, ...
N is limited by the maximal number of tied registers machine instruction can have (15 at the moment).
The current patch is restricted to handling relocations within a single basic block. Cross block relocations (e.g. invokes) are handled via the legacy mechanism. This restriction will be relaxed in future patches.
Patch By: dantrushin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81648
In the included test case the align 16 allowed the v23f32 load to handled as load v16f32, load v4f32, and load v4f32(one element not used). These loads all need to be concatenated together into a final vector. In this case we tried to concatenate the two v4f32 loads to match the type of the v16f32 load so we could do a second concat_vectors, but those loads alone only add up to v8f32. So we need to two v4f32 undefs to pad it.
It appears we've tried to hack around a similar issue in this code before by adding undef padding to loads in one of the earlier loops in this function. Originally in r147964 by padding all loads narrower than previous loads to the same size. Later modifed to only the last load in r293088. This patch removes that earlier code and just handles it on demand where we know we need it.
Fixes PR46820
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84463
This adds the llvm.abs(), llvm.umin(), llvm.umax(), llvm.smin(),
and llvm.smax() intrinsics specified in D81829. For SelectionDAG,
the ISD opcodes and all the legalization and lowering already exist,
so this just wires them up to the intrinsic in the SDAG builder and
adds rudimentary tests. For GlobalISel only the min/max intrinsics
are wired up, as llvm.abs() will require the addition of a G_ABS op,
and corresponding legalization support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84125
On systems where size() doesn't return unsigned long, this leads to an
overloading mismatch. Convert the constant to whatever type is used for
Q.size() on the system.
Currently popFromQueueImpl iterates over all candidates to find the best
one. While the candidate queue is small, this is not a problem. But it
becomes a problem once the queue gets larger. For example, the snippet
below takes 330s to compile with llc -O0, but completes in 3s with this
patch.
define void @test(i4000000* %ptr) {
entry:
store i4000000 0, i4000000* %ptr, align 4
ret void
}
This patch limits the number of candidates to check to 1000. This limit
ensures that it never triggers for test-suite/SPEC2000/SPEC2006 on X86
and AArch64 with -O3, while still drastically limiting the compile-time
in case of very large queues.
It would be even better to use a binary heap to manage to queue
(D83335), but some heuristics change the score of a node in the queue
after another node has been scheduled. I plan to address this for
backends that use the MachineScheduler in the future, but that requires
a more careful evaluation. In the meantime, the limit should help users
impacted by this issue.
The patch includes a slightly smaller version of the motivating example
as test case, to guard against the issue.
Reviewers: efriedma, paquette, niravd
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84328
The AMDGPU handling of f16 vectors is terrible still since it gets
scalarized even when the vector operation is legal.
The code is is essentially duplicated between the non-strict and
strict case. Apparently no other expansions are currently trying to do
this. This is mostly because I found the behavior of
getStrictFPOperationAction to be confusing. In the ARM case, it would
expand strict_fsub even though it shouldn't due to the later check. At
that point, the logic required to check for legality was more complex
than just duplicating the 2 instruction expansion.
This isn't a natively supported operation, so convert it to a
mask+compare.
In addition to the operation itself, fix up some surrounding stuff to
make the testcase work: we need concat_vectors on i1 vectors, we need
legalization of i1 vector truncates, and we need to fix up all the
relevant uses of getVectorNumElements().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83811
MBBs are not allowed to have non-terminator instructions after the first
terminator. Currently in some cases (see the modified test),
EmitSchedule can add DBG_VALUEs after the last terminator, for example
when referring a debug value that gets folded into a TCRETURN
instruction on ARM.
This patch updates EmitSchedule to move inserted DBG_VALUEs just before
the first terminator. I am not sure if there are terminators produce
values that can in turn be used by a DBG_VALUE. In that case, moving the
DBG_VALUE might result in referencing an undefined register. But in any
case, it seems like currently there is no way to insert a proper DBG_VALUEs
for such registers anyways.
Alternatively it might make sense to just remove those extra DBG_VALUES.
I am not too familiar with the details of debug info in the backend and
would appreciate any suggestions on how to address the issue in the best
possible way.
Reviewers: vsk, aprantl, jpaquette, efriedma, paquette
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83561
In an upcoming AMDGPU patch, the scalar cases will be legal and vector
ops should be scalarized, rather than producing a long sequence of
vector ops which will also need to be scalarized.
Use a lazy heuristic that seems to work and improves the thumb2 MVE
test.
When the byref attribute is added, there will need to be two similar
functions for the existing cases which have an associate value copy,
and byref which does not. Most, but not all of the existing uses will
use the existing version.
The associated size function added by D82679 also needs to
contextually differ, and will help eliminate a few places still
relying on pointee element types.
Summary:
This patch modifies IncrementMemoryAddress to use a vscale
when calculating the new address if the data type is scalable.
Also adds tablegen patterns which match an extract_subvector
of a legal predicate type with zip1/zip2 instructions
Reviewers: sdesmalen, efriedma, david-arm
Reviewed By: efriedma, david-arm
Subscribers: tschuett, hiraditya, psnobl, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83137
The operands of a BUILD_VECTOR must all have the same type, so we can hoist this invariant condition out of the loop.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83882
Some of the system registers readable on AArch64 and ARM platforms
return different values with each read (for example a timer counter),
these shouldn't be hoisted outside loops or otherwise interfered with,
but the normal @llvm.read_register intrinsic is only considered to read
memory.
This introduces a separate @llvm.read_volatile_register intrinsic and
maps all system-registers on ARM platforms to use it for the
__builtin_arm_rsr calls. Registers declared with asm("r9") or similar
are unaffected.
The existing code already considered this case. Unfortunately a typo in
the condition prevents it from triggering. Also the existing code, had
it run, forgot to do the folding.
This fixes PR42876.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65802
ComputeNumSignBits and computeKnownBits both trigger "Scalable flag
may be dropped" warnings when a fixed length vector is extracted
from a scalable vector. This patch assumes nothing about the
demanded elements thus matching the behaviour when extracting a
scalable vector from a scalable vector.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83642
In DAGCombiner::TransformFPLoadStorePair we were dropping the scalable
property of TypeSize when trying to create an integer type of equivalent
size. In fact, this optimisation makes no sense for scalable types
since we don't know the size at compile time. I have changed the code
to bail out when encountering scalable type sizes.
I've added a test to
llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/sve-fp.ll
that exercises this code path. The test already emits an error if it
encounters warnings due to implicit TypeSize->uint64_t conversions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83572
We have this generic transform in IR (instcombine),
but as shown in PR41098:
http://bugs.llvm.org/PR41098
...the pattern may emerge in codegen too.
x86 has a potential refinement/reversal opportunity here,
but that should come later or needs a target hook to
avoid the transform. Converting to bswap is the more
specific form, so we should use it if it is available.
This carves out an exception for a pair of consecutive loads that are
reversed from the consecutive order of a pair of stores. All of the
existing profitability/legality checks for the memops remain between
the 2 altered hunks of code.
This should give us the same x86 base-case asm that gcc gets in
PR41098 and PR44895:
http://bugs.llvm.org/PR41098http://bugs.llvm.org/PR44895
I think we are missing a potential subsequent conversion to use "movbe"
if the target supports that. That might be similar to what AArch64
would use to get "rev16".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83567
This carves out an exception for a pair of consecutive loads that are
reversed from the consecutive order of a pair of stores. All of the
existing profitability/legality checks for the memops remain between
the 2 altered hunks of code.
This should give us the same x86 base-case asm that gcc gets in
PR41098 and PR44895:i
http://bugs.llvm.org/PR41098http://bugs.llvm.org/PR44895
I think we are missing a potential subsequent conversion to use "movbe"
if the target supports that. That might be similar to what AArch64
would use to get "rev16".
Differential Revision:
Summary:
Helper used when splitting load & store operations to calculate
the pointer + offset for the high half of the split
Reviewers: efriedma, sdesmalen, david-arm
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: tschuett, hiraditya, psnobl, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83577
fadd (fma A, B, (fmul C, D)), E --> fma A, B, (fma C, D, E)
This is only allowed when "reassoc" is present on the fadd.
As discussed in D80801, this transform goes beyond
what is allowed by "contract" FMF (-ffp-contract=fast).
That is because we are fusing the trailing add of 'E' with a
multiply, but without "reassoc", the code mandates that the
products A*B and C*D are added together before adding in 'E'.
I've added this example to the LangRef to try to clarify the
meaning of "contract". If that seems reasonable, we should
probably do something similar for the clang docs because
there does not appear to be any formal spec for the behavior
of -ffp-contract=fast.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82499
In DAGTypeLegalizer::SetSplitVector I have changed calls in the assert
from getVectorNumElements() to getVectorElementCount(), since this
code path works for both fixed and scalable vectors.
This fixes up one warning in the test:
sve-sext-zext.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83196
This patch replaces some invalid calls to getVectorNumElements() with calls
to getVectorMinNumElements() instead, since the code paths changed in this
patch work for both fixed and scalable vector types.
Fixes warnings in this test:
sve-sext-zext.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83203
Simon Pilgrim