some more bullet-proofing/enhancements for tryEvaluate. This shouldn't
cause any behavior changes except for handling cases where we were
crashing before and being able to evaluate a few more cases in tryEvaluate.
This should settle the minor mess surrounding r59196.
llvm-svn: 59224
little rude; I figure it's cleaner to just back this out now so
it doesn't get forgotten or mixed up with other checkins.
The modification to isICE is simply wrong; I've added a test that the
change to isICE breaks.
I'm pretty sure the modification to tryEvaluate is also wrong.
At the very least, there's some serious miscommunication going on here,
as this is going in exactly the opposite direction of r59105. My
understanding is that tryEvaluate is not supposed to care about side
effects. That said, a lot of the clients to tryEvaluate are
expecting it to enforce a no-side-effects policy, so we probably need
another method that provides that guarantee.
llvm-svn: 59212
landing pads.
- Primarily a cleanliness issue instead of a performance issue (this
eliminates all blocks w/o predecessors on 176.gcc/expr.c), but this
also allows subsequent code to recognize it is unreachable and
potentially avoid IRgen.
llvm-svn: 59211
- Use dotted notation for blocks related to a particular statement
type.
- Use .end for landing pads.
No functionality change in NDEBUG mode. :)
llvm-svn: 59210
- Indicates that caller is done with the block and it can be dropped
if it has no predecessors. Useful for callers who need to make
landing pads but which may not be reached.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 59207
- Evaluation of , operator used bogus assumption that LHS could be
evaluated as an integral expression even though its type is
unspecified.
This change is making isICE very permissive of the LHS in non-evaluated
contexts because it is not clear what predicate we would use to reject
code here. The standard didn't offer me any guidance; opinions?
llvm-svn: 59196
conversion functions. Instead, we just use a placeholder identifier
for these (e.g., "<constructor>") and override NamedDecl::getName() to
provide a human-readable name.
This is one potential solution to the problem; another solution would
be to replace the use of IdentifierInfo* in NamedDecl with a different
class that deals with identifiers better. I'm also prototyping that to
see how it compares, but this commit is better than what we had
previously.
llvm-svn: 59193
PreprocessorLexer now has a virtual method "IndirectLex" which allows it to call the lex method of its subclasses. This is not for performance intensive operations.
llvm-svn: 59185
- Rename SetSVal to BindLoc
- Add BindDecl
- Add BindExpr
GRState:
- Environment now binds to Stmt* instead of Expr*. This is needed for processing ObjCForCollectionStmt (essentially the declaration of the the 'element' variable can have an SVal attached to it).
- BindDecl no longer accepts Expr* for the initialization value; use SVal* instead.
llvm-svn: 59152
functions for built-in operators, e.g., the builtin
bool operator==(int const*, int const*)
can be used for the expression "x1 == x2" given:
struct X {
operator int const*();
} x1, x2;
The scheme for handling these built-in operators is relatively simple:
for each candidate required by the standard, create a special kind of
candidate function for the built-in. If overload resolution picks the
built-in operator, we perform the appropriate conversions on the
arguments and then let the normal built-in operator take care of it.
There may be some optimization opportunity left: if we can reduce the
number of built-in operator overloads we generate, overload resolution
for these cases will go faster. However, one must be careful when
doing this: GCC generates too few operator overloads in our little
test program, and fails to compile it because none of the overloads it
generates match.
Note that we only support operator overload for non-member binary
operators at the moment. The other operators will follow.
As part of this change, ImplicitCastExpr can now be an lvalue.
llvm-svn: 59148
This pushes it a lot closer to being able to deal with most of the stuff
CodeGen's constant expression evaluator knows how to deal with. This
also fixes PR3003.
The test could possibly use some improvement, but this'll work for now.
Test 6 is inspired by PR3003; the other tests are mostly just designed
to exercise the new code. The reason for the funny structure of the
tests is that type fixing for arrays inside of structs is the only place
in Sema that calls tryEvaluate, at least for the moment.
llvm-svn: 59125
Ted Kremenek