Summary: In standalone builds `LLVM_BINARY_DIR` was equal to `LLDB_BINARY_DIR` so far. This is counterintuitive and invalidated the values of `LLDB_DEFAULT_TEST_DSYMUTIL/FILECHECK/COMPILER` etc.
Reviewers: zturner, labath, clayborg, JDevlieghere, stella.stamenova, serge-sans-paille
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: mgorny, friss, lldb-commits, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56443
llvm-svn: 350738
A year or so ago, I re-wrote most of the lit infrastructure in LLVM so
that it wasn't so boilerplate-y. I added lots of common helper type
stuff, simplifed usage patterns, and made the code more elegant and
maintainable.
We migrated to this in LLVM, clang, and lld's lit files, but not in
LLDBs. This started to bite me recently, as the 4 most recent times I
tried to run the lit test suite in LLDB on a fresh checkout the first
thing that would happen is that python would just start crashing with
unhelpful backtraces and I would have to spend time investigating.
You can reproduce this today by doing a fresh cmake generation, doing
ninja lldb and then python bin/llvm-lit.py -sv ~/lldb/lit/SymbolFile at
which point you'll get a segfault that tells you nothing about what your
problem is.
I started trying to fix the issues with bandaids, but it became clear
that the proper solution was to just bring in the work I did in the rest
of the projects. The side benefit of this is that the lit configuration
files become much cleaner and more understandable as a result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54009
llvm-svn: 346008
This is a resubmission of r313270. It broke standalone builds of
compiler-rt because we were not correctly generating the llvm-lit
script in the standalone build directory.
The fixes incorporated here attempt to find llvm/utils/llvm-lit
from the source tree returned by llvm-config. If present, it
will generate llvm-lit into the output directory. Regardless,
the user can specify -DLLVM_EXTERNAL_LIT to point to a specific
lit.py on their file system. This supports the use case of
someone installing lit via a package manager. If it cannot find
a source tree, and -DLLVM_EXTERNAL_LIT is either unspecified or
invalid, then we print a warning that tests will not be able
to run.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37756
llvm-svn: 313407
This patch is still breaking several multi-stage compiler-rt bots.
I already know what the fix is, but I want to get the bots green
for now and then try re-applying in the morning.
llvm-svn: 313335
This patch simplifies LLVM's lit infrastructure by enforcing an ordering
that a site config is always run before a source-tree config.
A significant amount of the complexity from lit config files arises from
the fact that inside of a source-tree config file, we don't yet know if
the site config has been run. However it is *always* required to run
a site config first, because it passes various variables down through
CMake that the main config depends on. As a result, every config
file has to do a bunch of magic to try to reverse-engineer the location
of the site config file if they detect (heuristically) that the site
config file has not yet been run.
This patch solves the problem by emitting a mapping from source tree
config file to binary tree site config file in llvm-lit.py. Then, during
discovery when we find a config file, we check to see if we have a
target mapping for it, and if so we use that instead.
This mechanism is generic enough that it does not affect external users
of lit. They will just not have a config mapping defined, and everything
will work as normal.
On the other hand, for us it allows us to make many simplifications:
* We are guaranteed that a site config will be executed first
* Inside of a main config, we no longer have to assume that attributes
might not be present and use getattr everywhere.
* We no longer have to pass parameters such as --param llvm_site_config=<path>
on the command line.
* It is future-proof, meaning you don't have to edit llvm-lit.in to add
support for new projects.
* All of the duplicated logic of trying various fallback mechanisms of
finding a site config from the main config are now gone.
One potentially noteworthy thing that was required to implement this
change is that whereas the ninja check targets previously used the first
method to spawn lit, they now use the second. In particular, you can no
longer run lit.py against the source tree while specifying the various
`foo_site_config=<path>` parameters. Instead, you need to run
llvm-lit.py.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37756
llvm-svn: 313270
Summary:
This patch supplies basic infrastructure for LLDB to use LIT, and ports a few basic test cases from the LLDB test suite into LIT.
With this patch the LLDB lit system is not capable or intended to fully replace the existing LLDB test suite, but this first patch enables people to write lit tests for LLDB.
The lit substitution for %cc and %cxx default to the host compiler unless the CMake option LLDB_TEST_CLANG is On, in which case the in-tree clang will be used.
The target check-lldb-lit will run all lit tests including the lit-based executor for the unit tests. Alternatively there is a target generated for each subdirectory under the lit directory, so check-lldb-unit and check-lldb-expr will run just the tests under their respective directories.
The ported tests are not removed from the existing suite, and should not be until such a time when the lit runner is mature and in use by bots and workflows.
Reviewers: zturner, labath, jingham, tfiala
Subscribers: beanz, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24591
llvm-svn: 281651
At the moment almost every lit.site.cfg.in contains two lines comment:
## Autogenerated by LLVM/Clang configuration.
# Do not edit!
The patch adds variable LIT_SITE_CFG_IN_HEADER, that is replaced from
configure_lit_site_cfg with the note and some useful information.
llvm-svn: 266522
Stefan Granitz