The logic that actually compares the types considers pointers and integers the
same if they are of the same size. This created a strange mismatch between hash
and reality and made the test case for this fail on some platforms (yay,
test cases).
llvm-svn: 179905
When matching a compare with a subtract where the arguments of the compare are
swapped w.r.t. the arguments of the subtract, we need to negate the predicates
(or CR bit indices) of the users. This, however, is not the same as inverting
the predicate (negating LT -> GT, but inverting LT -> GE, for example). The ARM
backend seems to do this correctly, but when I adapted the code for the PPC
backend, I introduced an error in this logic.
Comparison optimization is now enabled again by default.
llvm-svn: 179899
Thanks to Evgeniy Stepanov for reporting this.
It might be a good idea to add a command iterator abstraction to MachO.h, but
this fixes the bug for now.
llvm-svn: 179848
Adding another CU-wide list, in this case of imported_modules (since they
should be relatively rare, it seemed better to add a list where each element
had a "context" value, rather than add a (usually empty) list to every scope).
This takes care of DW_TAG_imported_module, but to fully address PR14606 we'll
need to expand this to cover DW_TAG_imported_declaration too.
llvm-svn: 179836
Many PPC instructions have a so-called 'record form' which stores to a specific
condition register the result of comparing the result of the instruction with
zero (always as a signed comparison). For integer operations on PPC64, this is
always a 64-bit comparison.
This implementation is derived from the implementation in the ARM backend;
there are some differences because PPC condition registers are allocatable
virtual registers (although the record forms always use a specific one), and we
look for a matching subtraction instruction after the compare (but before the
first use) in addition to before it.
llvm-svn: 179802
In X86FastISel::X86SelectStore(), improperly aligned stores are rejected and
handled by the DAG-based ISel. However, X86FastISel::X86SelectLoad() makes
no such requirement. There doesn't appear to be an x86 architectural
correctness issue with allowing potentially unaligned store instructions.
This patch removes this restriction.
Patch by Jim Stichnot.
llvm-svn: 179774
A min/max operation is represented by a select(cmp(lt/le/gt/ge, X, Y), X, Y)
sequence in LLVM. If we see such a sequence we can treat it just as any other
commutative binary instruction and reduce it.
This appears to help bzip2 by about 1.5% on an imac12,2.
radar://12960601
llvm-svn: 179773
This occurs due to an alloca representing a separate ownership from the
original pointer. Thus consider the following pseudo-IR:
objc_retain(%a)
for (...) {
objc_retain(%a)
%block <- %a
F(%block)
objc_release(%block)
}
objc_release(%a)
From the perspective of the optimizer, the %block is a separate
provenance from the original %a. Thus the optimizer pairs up the inner
retain for %a and the outer release from %a, resulting in segfaults.
This is fixed by noting that the signature of a mismatch of
retain/releases inside the for loop is a Use/CanRelease top down with an
None bottom up (since bottom up the Retain-CanRelease-Use-Release
sequence is completed by the inner objc_retain, but top down due to the
differing provenance from the objc_release said sequence is not
completed). In said case in CheckForCFGHazards, we now clear the state
of %a implying that no pairing will occur.
Additionally a test case is included.
rdar://12969722
llvm-svn: 179747
unable to handle cases such as __asm mov eax, 8*-8.
This patch also attempts to simplify the state machine. Further, the error
reporting has been improved. Test cases included, but more will be added to
the clang side shortly.
rdar://13668445
llvm-svn: 179719
for the sdiv/srem/udiv/urem bitcode instructions. This is done for the i8,
i16, and i32 types, as well as i64 for the x86_64 target.
Patch by Jim Stichnoth
llvm-svn: 179715
The reference manual defines only 5 permitted values for the immediate field of the "hint" instruction:
1. nop (imm == 0)
2. yield (imm == 1)
3. wfe (imm == 2)
4. wfi (imm == 3)
5. sev (imm == 4)
Therefore, restrict the permitted values for the "hint" instruction to 0 through 4.
Patch by Mihail Popa <Mihail.Popa@arm.com>
llvm-svn: 179707
Stephen Lin