This allows us to better reason about status objects, like Clang's own
llvm::Optional (when its contents are trivially destructible), which are
often intended to be passed around by value.
We still don't inline constructors for temporaries in the general case.
<rdar://problem/11986434>
llvm-svn: 162681
This section (introduced in DWARF-3) is used to define instruction address
ranges for functions that are not contiguous and can't be described
by low_pc/high_pc attributes (this is the usual case for inlined subroutines).
The patch is the first step to support fetching complete inlining info from DWARF.
Reviewed by Benjamin Kramer.
llvm-svn: 162657
provided char type other than char or wchar_t. It throw exception during
construction, so there is no chance to imbue own ctype.
This fixes http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13698
llvm-svn: 162648
It does not consider user-defined conversions that convert an rvalue
into an lvalue and works incorrectly for types with such a conversion
operator.
For example,
struct foo
{
operator int&();
};
returns false_type.
Attached a patch that fixes this problem.
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13601
llvm-svn: 162644
This allows checkers (like the MallocChecker) to process the effects of the
bind. Previously, using a memory-allocating function (like strdup()) in an
initializer would result in a leak warning.
This does bend the expectations of checkBind a bit; since there is no
assignment expression, the statement being used is the initializer value.
In most cases this shouldn't matter because we'll use a PostInitializer
program point (rather than PostStmt) for any checker-generated nodes, though
we /will/ generate a PostStore node referencing the internal statement.
(In theory this could have funny effects if someone actually does an
assignment within an initializer; in practice, that seems like it would be
very rare.)
<rdar://problem/12171711>
llvm-svn: 162637
by this mode, and also check for signed left shift overflow. The rules for the
latter are a little subtle:
* neither C89 nor C++98 specify the behavior of a signed left shift at all
* in C99 and C11, shifting a 1 bit into the sign bit has undefined behavior
* in C++11, with core issue 1457, shifting a 1 bit *out* of the sign bit has
undefined behavior
As of this change, we use the C99 rules for all C language variants, and the
C++11 rules for all C++ language variants. Once we have individual
-fcatch-undefined-behavior= flags, this should be revisited.
llvm-svn: 162634
Enrico Granata