The only thing missing for basic llvm-symbolizer support is the ability on
lib/Object to get a wasm symbol's section ID, which allows sorting and
computation of the symbols' sizes.
Also, when the WasmAsmParser switches sections on new functions, also add the
section to the list of Dwarf sections if Dwarf is being generated for assembly;
this allows writing of simple tests.
Reviewers: sbc100, jhenderson, aardappel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73246
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
We use llvm-symbolizer in some production systems, and we run it
against all possibly related files, including some that are not
ELF. We noticed that for some of those invalid files, llvm-symbolizer
would crash with SEGFAULT. Here is an example of such a file.
It is due to that in computeSymbolSizes, a loop uses condition
for (unsigned I = 0, N = Addresses.size() - 1; I < N; ++I) {
where if Addresses.size() is 0, N would overflow and causing the loop
to access invalid memory.
Instead of patching the loop conditions, the commit makes so that the
function returns early if Addresses is empty.
Validated by checking that llvm-symbolizer no longer crashes.
Patch by Teng Qin!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44285
llvm-svn: 330610
Sometimes, llvm-symbolizer gives wrong results due to incorrect sizes of some symbols. The reason for that was an incorrectly sorted array in computeSymbolSizes. The comparison function used subtraction of unsigned types, which is incorrect. Let's change this to return explicit -1 or 1.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26537
llvm-svn: 287028
On ELF that was already the case since getting the size of a symbol
never fails.
On MachO and COFF we could fail trying to get the section of a symbol. But
we don't really need the section, just the section number to know if two
symbols are in the same section or not.
llvm-svn: 240580
COFF and MachO only define symbol sizes for common symbols. Reflect that
in the class hierarchy by having a method for common symbols only in the base
and a general one in ELF.
This avoids the need of using a magic value for the size, which had a few
problems
* Most callers didn't check for it.
* The ones that did could not tell the magic value from a file actually having
that value.
llvm-svn: 240529
Nate Voorhies