Previously, we used VLD1.32 in all cases, however there are both 16 and 64-bit
accesses being selected, so we need to use an appropriate width load in those
cases.
llvm-svn: 161748
intrinsics. The second instruction(s) to be handled are the vector versions
of count set bits (ctpop).
The changes here are to clang so that it generates a target independent
vector ctpop when it sees an ARM dependent vector bits set count. The changes
in llvm are to match the target independent vector ctpop and in
VMCore/AutoUpgrade.cpp to update any existing bc files containing ARM
dependent vector pop counts with target-independent ctpops. There are also
changes to an existing test case in llvm for ARM vector count instructions and
to a test for the bitcode upgrade.
<rdar://problem/11892519>
There is deliberately no test for the change to clang, as so far as I know, no
consensus has been reached regarding how to test neon instructions in clang;
q.v. <rdar://problem/8762292>
llvm-svn: 160410
intrinsics with target-indepdent intrinsics. The first instruction(s) to be
handled are the vector versions of count leading zeros (ctlz).
The changes here are to clang so that it generates a target independent
vector ctlz when it sees an ARM dependent vector ctlz. The changes in llvm
are to match the target independent vector ctlz and in VMCore/AutoUpgrade.cpp
to update any existing bc files containing ARM dependent vector ctlzs with
target-independent ctlzs. There are also changes to an existing test case in
llvm for ARM vector count instructions and a new test for the bitcode upgrade.
<rdar://problem/11831778>
There is deliberately no test for the change to clang, as so far as I know, no
consensus has been reached regarding how to test neon instructions in clang;
q.v. <rdar://problem/8762292>
llvm-svn: 160200
Some NEON instructions want to match against normal SDNodes for some
operand types and Intrinsics for others. For example, CTLZ. To enable this,
switch from explicitly requiring Intrinsic on the class templates to using
SDPatternOperator instead.
llvm-svn: 159974
On some cores it's a bad idea for performance to mix VFP and NEON instructions
and since these patterns are NEON anyway, the NEON load should be used.
llvm-svn: 155630
Use the new TwoOperandAliasConstraint to handle lots of the two-operand aliases
for NEON instructions. There's still more to go, but this is a good chunk of
them.
llvm-svn: 155210
While there is an encoding for it in VUZP, the result of that is undefined,
so we should avoid it. Define the instruction as a pseudo for VTRN.32
instead, as the ARM ARM indicates.
rdar://11222366
llvm-svn: 154511
While there is an encoding for it in VZIP, the result of that is undefined,
so we should avoid it. Define the instruction as a pseudo for VTRN.32
instead, as the ARM ARM indicates.
rdar://11221911
llvm-svn: 154505
predicates.
Also remove NEON2 since it's not really useful and it is confusing. If
NEON + VFP4 implies NEON2 but NEON2 doesn't imply NEON + VFP4, what does it
really mean?
rdar://10139676
llvm-svn: 154480
1. The new instruction itinerary entries are not properly described.
2. The asm parser can't handle vfms and vfnms.
3. There were no assembler, disassembler test cases.
4. HasNEON2 has the wrong assembler predicate.
rdar://10139676
llvm-svn: 154456
The arm_neon intrinsics can create virtual registers from the DPair
register class which allows both even-odd and odd-even D-register pairs.
This fixes PR12389.
llvm-svn: 153603
With the new composite physical registers to represent arbitrary pairs
of DPR registers, we don't need the pseudo-registers anymore. Get rid of
a bunch of them that use DPR register pairs and just use the real
instructions directly instead.
llvm-svn: 152045
In this update:
- I assumed neon2 does not imply vfpv4, but neon and vfpv4 imply neon2.
- I kept setting .fpu=neon-vfpv4 code attribute because that is what the
assembler understands.
Patch by Ana Pazos <apazos@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 152036
Tim Northover